Religion & Public Life With Mark Silk

Religion & Public Life With Mark Silk


Religious influence, more or less

posted by Mark Silk

Here is how Americans have, over the past decade, responded to Gallup’s question about whether they want organized religion to have more or less influence in their nation. What’s the interpretation?

influence of religion.gifI’d
say the relevant correlation is with the politically party of the
president. When POTUS is a Republican, there’s a drift toward wanting
less religious influence. When POTUS is a Democrat, it’s the other way
around. Happy Prayer Breakfast day, Mr. Obama.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(2)
post a comment
MH

posted February 3, 2011 at 10:24 pm


Here’s how I would interpret this.
Collectively people form a normal distribution with most people tending towards the middle. However, because a large number of voters are independents, the two major political parties form a bi-modal distribution with humps away from the middle. But this means the average person is always going to see government as either too hot or too cold, but never just right.
So when a Republican is in office he’ll be more God and country than the average, and a Democrat more secular.
In summary, we are doomed to be dissatisfied with our government (on average).



report abuse
 

Mark Silk

posted February 4, 2011 at 11:57 am


Maybe so, but note that the plurality position has always been Goldilocks’ “just right.”



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

Another Blog To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Religion and Public Life. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Latest News Story on Beliefnet Happy Reading!  

posted 3:10:11pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

The Ayn Rand Republicans
I confess to feeling a little bit queasy about the American Values Network's new video hoisting Rep. Paul Ryan, Sen. Rand Paul, Rush Limbaugh, and other GOP luminaries on the petard of Ayn Rand and her atheistic philosophy of objectivism. Take a look. [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TxCW

posted 7:13:30pm May. 24, 2011 | read full post »

Whither evangelicals?
I'm fully prepared to believe that Mitch Daniels' family proved to be the unleapable hurdle in his abortive run-up to the GOP presidential race. Imagine yourself as wife Cheri, having split for the coast to marry on old flame, your husband and young daughters left behind in Boone County, Indiana,

posted 9:19:56am May. 23, 2011 | read full post »

No more "social conservatives"
With the presidential election cycle getting up to speed, it's time for reporters and yakkers like me to stop writing about "social conservatives" as if they were an identifiable segment of the voting population. I say this as someone who has happily been using the term since late 2008, when it

posted 8:25:11am May. 20, 2011 | read full post »

So clerical celibacy was not the problem?
Those on the Catholic left are not very happy that the Jay Report declines in no uncertain terms to blame clerical celibacy for the sexual abuse crisis. As the report puts it: Factors that remained consistent over this time period, such as celibacy, do not explain the sexual abuse "crisis." Celib

posted 9:50:34am May. 19, 2011 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.