Religion & Public Life With Mark Silk

Religion & Public Life With Mark Silk


An Abortion Dissent

posted by Mark Silk

O'Brien.jpgLet me put in a plug for George Dennis O’Brien’s new book, The Church and Abortion: A Catholic Dissent.
No doubt that last word will immediately cause many pro-life Catholics
to turn away without a second thought. But as my friend Michael Sean
Winters likes to emphasize about himself (e.g. here), it’s often from people with whom you disagree that you learn the most.

O’Brien,
a former college president, is a philosopher by training who brings to
the superheated abortion debate dispassionate prose, orderly arguments,
and pointed questions–especially for his pro-life co-religionists. For
example: If the latter are serious about forswearing criminal charges
against women who obtain abortions, how can they justify calling
abortion murder?

To Catholic politicians who support Roe v. Wade he says:

Stop
trying to avoid the issue by saying that you are personally opposed to
abortion or that you accept the Church’s views on abortion, but it
is not your responsibility as a legislator to impose your moral will on
the country. That is a cop-out. Anti-slavery legislators in the
nineteenth century did not retreat into personal opinion or religious
cover–they thought that there was something wrong with the law of the
land that needed radical change. The problem with abortion for a
sensible legislator is not whether it is right or wrong, religious or
impious; it is that it cannot be legislated away. When rounded on by
one’s local bishop for “supporting abortion,” don’t duck for cover–ask
the bishop just what law he would recommend that would accomplish the
prohibition of abortion. You won’t likely get an answer.

But that doesn’t mean that the bishop–and the rest of the pro-life community–shouldn’t be obliged to come up with one.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(1)
post a comment
Grumpy Old Person

posted November 12, 2010 at 12:24 pm


Oh, I suspect that they’d ‘get an answer’ alright. They’d get MANY answers, not all of them agreeing with the others. Some won’t even make an exception for rape, incest or the life of the woman.
Perhaps the only ‘answer’ with any feasability is for people (and the government) to get out of other people’s private lives. The (selectively) ‘pro-life’ side won’t like that answer, that’s for sure.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

Another Blog To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Religion and Public Life. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Latest News Story on Beliefnet Happy Reading!  

posted 3:10:11pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

The Ayn Rand Republicans
I confess to feeling a little bit queasy about the American Values Network's new video hoisting Rep. Paul Ryan, Sen. Rand Paul, Rush Limbaugh, and other GOP luminaries on the petard of Ayn Rand and her atheistic philosophy of objectivism. Take a look. [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TxCW

posted 7:13:30pm May. 24, 2011 | read full post »

Whither evangelicals?
I'm fully prepared to believe that Mitch Daniels' family proved to be the unleapable hurdle in his abortive run-up to the GOP presidential race. Imagine yourself as wife Cheri, having split for the coast to marry on old flame, your husband and young daughters left behind in Boone County, Indiana,

posted 9:19:56am May. 23, 2011 | read full post »

No more "social conservatives"
With the presidential election cycle getting up to speed, it's time for reporters and yakkers like me to stop writing about "social conservatives" as if they were an identifiable segment of the voting population. I say this as someone who has happily been using the term since late 2008, when it

posted 8:25:11am May. 20, 2011 | read full post »

So clerical celibacy was not the problem?
Those on the Catholic left are not very happy that the Jay Report declines in no uncertain terms to blame clerical celibacy for the sexual abuse crisis. As the report puts it: Factors that remained consistent over this time period, such as celibacy, do not explain the sexual abuse "crisis." Celib

posted 9:50:34am May. 19, 2011 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.