Project Conversion

Project Conversion


Multiple Wives: A Divine Right?

posted by abowen

When I turned 14 years old, I started working summers with my dad. He delivered bags of ice to the beach out of an 18-wheeler and, as it was with the Army, he spent a lot of time away from home. Because the days were long, I usually made a killing taking this ice to all the vacationers at the beach. We delivered mostly to grocery stores and gas stations so we constantly bumped into customers as we unloaded the climate-controlled trailer. One joke we constantly heard:

“Man, you have the coolest job in the world!”

Yeah, that was catchy…for the first week. Like all jokes told ad infinitum, it got old quick.

The same thing happened this month. When folks learn I’m exploring the Latter-day Saints, I am invariably asked, “So, you gonna pick up a few extra wives?”

At first, I would brush off the joke with a chuckle, but eventually–as happened with the ice jokes–I wanted to strangle the messenger. At one point, I considered replying with: “Yeah, how about I borrow yours for 31 days?”

So here I am, taking offense about a stereotype and I’m only an honorary member of the church. See what Project Conversion does? It makes you part of the tribe, and once you’re part of the tribe, you start looking at things in a whole new way.

Anyway, the jokes got the gears turning about this rumored polygamy thing. Was it really part of LDS culture, or just something hanging on the fringe of the church? More importantly, is this practice condoned scripturally?

The answer is: yes, and all over the place.

Genesis 16: 2-3 says,

2And Sarai said unto Abram, Behold now, the Lord hath restrained me from bearing: I pray thee, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her. And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai. 3And Sarai Abram’s wife took Hagar her maid the Egyptian, after Abram had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan, and gave her to her husband Abram to be his wife.

The implied purpose in the giving of a Hagar was to produce offspring. Remember, Abram (he wasn’t known as Abraham yet) was promised to become the “father of many nations.” Can’t do that with just one or two kids.

We see plural marriages and the use of concubines all through the Old Testament (or Tanakh for our Jewish friends), especially with kings and patriarchs like David, Solomon, and Abraham. Conservative theologians maintain that Jesus played hard-to-get and went lone wolf during his life. Turned out, he had more important things to do…

Next, we look at specific LDS scripture, namely The Doctrine and Covenants. The D & C is scripture written by the prophet Joseph Smith as well as a few other church presidents and contains revealed wisdom, guidance, and information for the church–usually as Joseph Smith and others asked for it from God. Section 132: 59-66 specifically addresses the issue of polygamy,

61 And again, as pertaining to the law of the priesthood–if any man espouse a virgin, and desire to espouse another, and the first give her consent, and if he espouse the second, and they are virgins, and have vowed to no other man, then is he justified; he cannot commit adultery for they are given unto him; for he cannot commit adultery with that that belongeth unto him and to no one else. 62 And if he have ten virgins given unto him by this law, he cannot commit adultery, for they belong to him, and they are given unto him; therefore is he justified. 63But if one or either of the ten virgins, after she is espoused, shall be with another man, she has committed adultery, and shall be destroyed; for they are given unto him to multiply and replenish the earth, according to my commandment, and to fulfil the promise which was given by my Father before the foundation of the world, and for their exaltation in the eternal worlds, that they may bear the souls of men; for herein is the work of my Father continued, that he may be glorified.

Why would Joseph Smith need revelation for more wives? The man was in the middle of building a religious movement. Did he really need the added pressure of a growing household? One theory I’ve heard is that Joseph’s wife caught him in bed with another woman. Subsequently, the Lord “revealed” the aforementioned scripture in order to justify his actions. On the other hand, we must remember that LDS members believe that each of us are spirit children, born of God, who planned for us to inhabit the earth that we might gain experience. In this context, Joseph Smith and other early church leaders/members seemed interested in expediting that plan. With such revelation in hand, they were cooking with grease.

The practice of polygamy continued through several leaders in the church until the United States government turned up the legislative heat on the matter in the 1862. By the 1880′s, the added pressure against polygamy had many LDS men on the run. Increasing turmoil in the church led then LDS president and prophet, Wilford Woodruff, to seek guidance from the Lord. Apparently, the Lord said enough is enough.

In 1889, church president Woodruff made an official declaration of the church called the Manifesto,” in order to abolish the practice of polygamy,

Inasmuch as laws have been enacted by Congress forbidding plural marriages, which laws have been pronounced constitutional by the court of last resort, I hereby declare my intention to submit to those laws, and to use my influence with the members of the Church over which I preside to have them do likewise. There is nothing in my teachings to the Church or in those of my associates, during the time specified, which can be reasonably construed to inculcate or encourage polygamy; and when any Elder of the Church has used language which appeared to convey any such teaching, he has been promptly reproved. And I now publicly declare that my advice to the Latter-day Saints is to refrain from contracting any marriage forbidden by the law of the land.

The die was cast and the mainstream LDS church officially stands against polygamy to this day, going so far as stating on the LDS.org site: “Groups who teach polygamy today are not part of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.”

 

Seems the death of polygamy in the LDS church is certain. But reality is never so cut and dry. The church still deals with the residue of their past to this day in the form of jokes, ridicule, ignorance, and even entertainment. Shows like Sister Wives and Big Love open the fresh wound of the polygamy issue on a daily basis. Interestingly enough, the cast of Sister Wives is even filing suit to legalize ”cohabitation and bigamy.”

Should be an interesting case.

The lesson here is to ask ourselves how we look at scripture in modern times. Polygamy was clearly given the green light during Joseph Smith’s time and those of the Bible, so if God and his wisdom is a universal constant, why change? Had the United States not issued laws against polygamy, would then church president Woodruff still issue the Manifesto against polygamy? Were his instructions divinely inspired, or reactionary? I don’t know, but cases such as these help us realize the more controversial side of all our scriptures…some that we tend to tuck under the rug as if to hide from view.

Does society change because of divine wisdom, or does divine wisdom adapt to changes in society?

For more information on the church’s position regarding polygamy, visit the LDS website.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(124)
post a comment
Anonymous

posted July 20, 2011 at 12:54 am


This explains a few issues you raise, particularly as to why plural marraige continued post Manifesto:

http://lds.org/study/topics/polygamy-plural-marriage?lang=eng

Your tone here has a lot of strain. You obviously don’t believe in plural marraige, and the church officially denounces its practice today…so why the frustration?



report abuse
 

Jack Woods

posted July 20, 2011 at 12:41 am


Ok David, again you went back to the Manifesto. Maybe you need to figure out what they meant instead of believing what leaders today tell you it meant. 

1) In 1897, Wilford Woodruff married Madame Mountford, ie a plural marriage. :)

2) George Q Cannon personally performed plural marriage ceremonies for three of his sons from 1892 onward. 

Obviously, either these two men(that you quote) were fallen prophets……..by your own quote you say it is impossible, or there is a different meaning to the Manifesto than you understand. It is this line of thinking that caused me to go down a road. 

I believe that the manifesto put the responsibility of the individual to practice plural marriage and it was no longer the responsibility of the church. Individual Free Agency is one of the most important parts of the gospel so it stands to reason that this is who it should progress. We are all personally responsible for our eternal progression.  

It’s interesting to note that the Apostle John Taylor and others made clear that they believed the same. 

In other words, David, you have the free agency to decide if you want exaltation or not. That is a choice you need to make for yourself, but please don’t prevent me from choosing exaltation………like the current LDS Church leadership wants to do….



report abuse
 

Jack Woods

posted July 20, 2011 at 12:41 am


Ok David, again you went back to the Manifesto. Maybe you need to figure out what they meant instead of believing what leaders today tell you it meant. 

1) In 1897, Wilford Woodruff married Madame Mountford, ie a plural marriage. :)

2) George Q Cannon personally performed plural marriage ceremonies for three of his sons from 1892 onward. 

Obviously, either these two men(that you quote) were fallen prophets……..by your own quote you say it is impossible, or there is a different meaning to the Manifesto than you understand. It is this line of thinking that caused me to go down a road. 

I believe that the manifesto put the responsibility of the individual to practice plural marriage and it was no longer the responsibility of the church. Individual Free Agency is one of the most important parts of the gospel so it stands to reason that this is who it should progress. We are all personally responsible for our eternal progression.  

It’s interesting to note that the Apostle John Taylor and others made clear that they believed the same. 

In other words, David, you have the free agency to decide if you want exaltation or not. That is a choice you need to make for yourself, but please don’t prevent me from choosing exaltation………like the current LDS Church leadership wants to do….



report abuse
 

Jack Woods

posted July 20, 2011 at 12:26 am


Yes, I know that scripture. And subsequent to Jacob 2:27 we have D&C 132 commanding us to practice it. In fact it told us that if we didn’t then we would be damned. That’s pretty serious and there should likewise be a commandment to stop it.  Where is the commandment to stop it? There is none…..Official Declaration isn’t a commandment to stop it.  



report abuse
 

Jack Woods

posted July 20, 2011 at 12:26 am


Yes, I know that scripture. And subsequent to Jacob 2:27 we have D&C 132 commanding us to practice it. In fact it told us that if we didn’t then we would be damned. That’s pretty serious and there should likewise be a commandment to stop it.  Where is the commandment to stop it? There is none…..Official Declaration isn’t a commandment to stop it.  



report abuse
 

David

posted July 19, 2011 at 8:55 pm


Wikipedia has a great diagram detailing the relationship between all the branches: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LDS_movement#Denominations

It’s pretty complicated. According to the entry, 98% (14 million) of the “Latter Day Saint movement” is contained in the Utah-based Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.



report abuse
 

David

posted July 19, 2011 at 8:55 pm


Wikipedia has a great diagram detailing the relationship between all the branches: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LDS_movement#Denominations

It’s pretty complicated. According to the entry, 98% (14 million) of the “Latter Day Saint movement” is contained in the Utah-based Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.



report abuse
 

David

posted July 19, 2011 at 5:43 pm


I think in the case you’re speaking of, members of the Church were entirely willing to continue the practice of polygamy despite the US Government’s involvement, including imprisonment of its members, the disfranchisement of all property and possessions, and the dissolution of the Church as a legal entity. The Lord saw that His people were willing to make this sacrifice, and then said essentially, “It is enough,” and removed the requirement to continue the practice.

The temporal salvation of the Church was apparently of higher value to the Lord than the practice of an eternal but not absolutely necessary principle. If the US Government had passed a law against performing baptisms, He might have had the Church continue the fight, as baptism is an essential ordinance of salvation.



report abuse
 

David

posted July 19, 2011 at 5:43 pm


I think in the case you’re speaking of, members of the Church were entirely willing to continue the practice of polygamy despite the US Government’s involvement, including imprisonment of its members, the disfranchisement of all property and possessions, and the dissolution of the Church as a legal entity. The Lord saw that His people were willing to make this sacrifice, and then said essentially, “It is enough,” and removed the requirement to continue the practice.

The temporal salvation of the Church was apparently of higher value to the Lord than the practice of an eternal but not absolutely necessary principle. If the US Government had passed a law against performing baptisms, He might have had the Church continue the fight, as baptism is an essential ordinance of salvation.



report abuse
 

Blackbird

posted July 19, 2011 at 5:30 pm


Hi Tina, I’ve really appreciated your level headed comments and i can completely see where you are coming from.

I think it’s important to understand just how highly regarded women are in the LDS church.  The verses provided here in D&C 132 are a mere slice of the entire picture. Here’s an excellent article that examines women’s roles in the LDS church, both now and through history:

http://www.fairlds.org/FAIR_Conferences/2004_Place_of_Mormon_Women.html

Whether or not you agree with the theology of the LDS church, i hope it helps you make a more informed decision on how LDS women fit in.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

Another Blog To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Project Conversion. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Religion 101 Happy Reading!

posted 2:34:58pm Aug. 02, 2012 | read full post »

Is God an Immersionist?
In the world of faith, folks often point out the obvious fact that God does not belong to a particular creed, religion, race, or school of philosophy. This sentiment establishes the divine as one which transcends divisive terms of affiliation. But I am here to announce that a brief exploration of

posted 7:00:59am Jul. 12, 2012 | read full post »

Immersion in Relationships: Five Ways to Bring your Relationships to Life
I did something last night with my wife that we haven't done in a very long time... Okay, not from that far back, but it certainly feels that way. Last night, we had a date night. N

posted 10:58:33am Jul. 10, 2012 | read full post »

The Path of Immersion: An Introduction and How Entering the Path Leads to a Deeper Sense of Self
Today marks my official declaration of fidelity and discipleship to the Path of Immersion. Along with that declaration, I also invite you to join me in whatever capacity feels the most suitable. The Path of Immersion is not one which demands conversion, evangelism, worship, or exclusivity. Along th

posted 6:00:19am Jul. 09, 2012 | read full post »

Farewell, Project Conversion: The End of an Adventure
When I converted to Christianity at the age of 15, I assumed the faith with a passionate resolve. Despite the positive instruction from my pastor and others, I (for reasons I cannot explain) transformed into a fiery evangelist, launching Christianity at friends and strangers like salvos of religious

posted 12:49:25pm Jul. 05, 2012 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.