Progressive Revival

Progressive Revival


Terri Schiavo, End of Life, and the Health Care Debate

posted by Paul Raushenbush

The last and only public policy debate we had about health care and end of life issues was the Terri Schiavo case. No wonder the conversation has turned hysterical.  End of life medical ethics are not abstract.  All of us will have to answer the question of how far we will go to keep ourselves and those we love alive during the last stages of life.  The Terri Schiavo case reminds us the perils of leaving these questions to the guesses of others.  Terri Schiavo’s husband maintained that she did not want to be kept alive on a respirator while being brain dead while her family felt that taking her off the respirator was an act of murder.  Congress got into the act and even then President Bush left his ranch to weigh in on the question.  Not exactly a measured reflection on end of life heath care policy.

 

Of course each of us want to live and keep the company of those we love as long as we can.  But each of us should take seriously the question of health care at the end of life and do some deep reflection on quality of life issues as they affect our families.  Different people will answer end of life question differently and religious people come to different decisions.  For some, all medical means should be taken to keep everyone’s lungs breathing and heart pumping for as long as possible.  For them this is what it means to value life.   For others, like myself, we want to weigh the quality of life that will be lived and make clear decisions about the limits to which we will use science to keep our bodies functioning after our ability to mentally or physically appreciate life have left us.  For me, that is what it means to value life while acknowledging the reality of mortality. There is a time to let go and embrace our life after death.

 

It is clear that each of us will have different beliefs and wishes regarding end of life health care.  To this end, the health care legislation proposed by Congress has provided an opportunity for everyone to have a consultation with their doctor to consider end of life issues.  This purely voluntary offering can lead to each of us reflecting on what kind of health care we want at the end of our lives and not leave it up to the guesses of our family members.  My parents have created a living will which tells their children their exact wishes when it comes to their own health care.   This end of life doctor consultation has come under attack for leading to euthanasia.   This is misleading and hysterical.  People will still be able to make their own decisions, and most people will probably not wan t to have this consultation at all.  But all of us should be thinking about it.  If Terri Schiavo had made her wishes explicit we wouldn’t have had the media circus we had to endure. 

 

While it cannot be the only or even primary reason for our decisions, Americans should be aware of the wider question of the cost of end of life health care and how it affects health care for society.  The numbers are staggering.  In an op-ed in the Chicago Tribune Anne Moore reported:

 

End-of-life care eats up 12 percent of U.S. health-care dollars. That’s not money spent getting well and extending life, that’s money spent preventing and easing death in terminally ill patients. Indeed, 30 percent of Medicare’s costs are spent in the last year of life

These statistics are put into their proper proportion when we remember that we have the highest infant mortality rate in the developed world, we don’t spend nearly as much as we might on preventative care, and health care for people with HIV/AIDS has been cut in this recent downturn.  And, of course, noticeably absent from all of this debate are the 50 million who can’t afford health care insurance at all.   Again, this is hard stuff and when it comes to the health care of our parents or ourselves.  We certainly don’t want to, and should have to, operate in terms of cost/benefit analysis. But the fact is that end of life health care is siphoning off more than its share of our health care resources.  

 

Right now the default setting for our health care system is to spend, spend, spend in the last stages of life even when there is no chance of recovery.   We should go into the end of life with eyes wide open as to our health care options. Americans should be glad that congress is trying to address this within the health care reform bill.  Part of being a responsible citizen is to make a well considered assessment of our own feelings about end of life issues with recognition of how our own decisions will affect the lives of others.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(5)
post a comment
Richird Birk

posted August 12, 2009 at 9:30 am


When Congress gets through passing another few trillion, inflation will be so high, the elderly that aren’t dying from lack of medical care, will be left eatng dogfood. The open purpose of Obama’s plans are to cut medicare. Democrats act like they don’t know that. So they lie to us. The lies are the problem. We don’t have an honest debate. We have fuzzy math and George Bush tactics from the Democrats. We got into Iraq the same way we’re going into Obamacare.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted August 12, 2009 at 10:32 am


Richird,
“The open purpose of Obama’s plans are to cut medicare. Democrats act like they don’t know that. So they lie to us.”
I’m not a Democrat, but I certainly do not “know that”. Please explain where your contention is supported.
Like you said, the lies are the problem, but they’re sure not emanating from the left. “Death panels” anyone? “Killing grandma”?



report abuse
 

James Gilmore

posted August 12, 2009 at 12:09 pm


When Congress gets through passing another few trillion



report abuse
 

James Gilmore

posted August 12, 2009 at 12:17 pm


Wow… don’t know why that happened.
When Congress gets through passing another few trillion
You do realize that HR3200 – the House bill – was scored by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office as deficit-neutral over the next ten years, right? The deficits we’re experiencing are, in large part, directly attributable to George W. Bush and his tax cuts for his greedy, filthy-rich cronies. The Laffer curve has been demonstrated not to work; if we taxed the rich fairly, we wouldn’t be experiencing these deficits.
The open purpose of Obama’s plans are to cut medicare.
If that’s their open purpose, then you should have absolutely no trouble finding a link in which President Obama or an official speaking for the administration says something to that effect. If you are unable to provide a link, then you might as well admit that you’re just making stuff up.
The lies are the problem. We don’t have an honest debate.
Well, you’re right about that. The lies are a problem. The liars who talk about “death panels” or mandatory euthanasia for old people should be called out for their lies and shunned by anyone who wants a respectful and honest conversation about the current health care reform proposals.
We don’t have an honest debate because our news media pretends that there are somehow two equally-valid sides to this discussion. There aren’t. The people who claim that death panels are in the bills being discussed are objectively wrong. Their opinions are invalid, as they’re arguing from a basis of complete fictions, fabrications, and outright lies. Until they’re willing to discuss what’s actually in the proposals, they don’t deserve to be part of the debate.
We have fuzzy math and George Bush tactics from the Democrats.
Fuzzy math? The CBO is engaging in fuzzy math?
We got into Iraq the same way we’re going into Obamacare.
I disagree. Our news media ignored the widespread (and in retrospect correct) opposition to the immoral and irresponsible war in Iraq in favor of a “patriotic” fervor that painted all opposition as disloyal and un-American. They ignored the fact that virtually every worldwide body of Christianity condemned the war. They failed to do their job in critically engaging the administration’s questionable (and, in retrospect, completely fabricated) assertions about Saddam Hussein’s capabilities and intentions.
On the contrary, now the news media is willing to give airtime to any lie that could prove detrimental to health care reform. Underwritten as they are by major corporate interests, they’re letting right-wing liars like Sarah Palin completely fabricate things out of thin air about what’s in the health care reform proposals, and not calling them out on their lies. They’re all too willing to present the people who stand up and disrupt town-hall meetings with outright lies as valid parts of our political process and representatives of a much larger group, rather than truthfully calling them ignorant members of the lunatic fringe.



report abuse
 

Hillary Fields

posted August 12, 2009 at 1:08 pm


Thanks for this thoughtful post! End-of-life care, and indeed health care in general are serious issues that couldn’t be hotter right now. Terry Schiavo’s case was one that really hit home for a lot of us – I remember watching it and feeling that they just had to let her go; it was awful how they fought over her like dogs with a bone.
Today on your sister Beliefnet blog, Everyday Ethics, we just posted about the Oregon woman, Barbara Wagner, who was offered ‘death drugs’ in lieu of expensive cancer treatment drugs by the Oregon Health Plan, along with a couple of other health care related ethical issues. I invite you and your readers to take a look.
http://blog.beliefnet.com/everydayethics/2009/08/health-care-reform-an-ethical-issue.html
Hillary



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Progressive Revival. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Faith, Media and Culture Prayer, Plain and Simple Happy Blogging!!!  

posted 2:50:10pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Why Jews Around the World are Praying for the Victory of the Egyptian Uprising
Originally appeared on Tikkun Daily BlogEver since the victory over the dictator of Tunisia and the subsequent uprising in Egypt, my email has been flooded with messages from Jews around the world hoping and praying for the victory of the Egyptian people over their cruel Mubarak regime.&nb

posted 1:48:39pm Feb. 01, 2011 | read full post »

When Generosity, Love, and Kindness are Public Policy, the Violence We Saw in Arizona will Dramatically Diminish
The attempted assassination of Congresswoman Giffords and the murder of so many others in Arizona has elicited a number of policy suggestions, from gun control to private protection for elected officials, to banning incitement to violence on websites either directly or more subtly (e.g., Sarah Palin

posted 2:44:04pm Jan. 19, 2011 | read full post »

The Spiritual Messages of Chanukah and Christmas -- and Their Downsides
Christmas and Chanukah share a spiritual message: that it is possible to bring light and hope in a world of darkness, oppression and despair. But whereas Christmas focuses on the birth of a single individual whose life and mission was itself supposed to bring liberation, Chanukah is about a national

posted 12:59:53pm Dec. 02, 2010 | read full post »

Obama (and Biden) Have No Clue About What's Bothering Their Political Base
Shortly before the California Democratic primary in 2008, the San Fransisco Chronicle invited me to write a short article explaining why I, chair of the interfaithNetwork of Spiritual Progressives, was supporting Barack Obama. Like most other progressive activists, I understood that a pres

posted 1:44:11pm Sep. 30, 2010 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.