Progressive Revival

Progressive Revival


Dog Whistles, Hypocrisy, and “Traditional” Christianity

posted by Ed Kilgore

I’m less certain than Mara Vanderslice that John McCain’s recent pattern of decrying Barack Obama’s “messianism” is a deliberate effort to label him as the Antichrist.  It’s not that I consider Team McCain incapable of “dog whistle” appeals to the Christian Right; their candidate has certainly mastered those dark arts in a variety of abstract references to his hatred of “judicial activism,” which to that audience means legalized abortion, gay partnership rights, and church-state separation.  But unless John Hagee spent some time whispering in McCain’s ear during their brief public partnership, I wouldn’t guess he or his campaign advisors possess the kind of theological dexterity necessary to paint the 666 on Obama’s forehead.  But maybe Mara’s right. We’ll see if McCain’s campaign continues using religiously-charged terms like “the anointed one” in references to their opponent. 

The more obvious problem with McCain’s attacks on Obama’s charisma is simple hypocrisy.  No recent presidential candidate in either party has done more to build a cult of personality around himself and his biography, from the arrogant assertion that he is uniquely a “straight-talker,” to the massive investment his campaigns past and present have made in the proposition that his courage and suffering as a POW should fully qualify him for the presidency and rebut any criticism.  (Yes, I know he has a long record in Congress, but even many Republicans admit that record is something of an incoherent mess, particularly given his vast flip-flopping during the current campaign cycle). 

McCain has also been an eager participant in the self-parodying WWRD (What Would Reagan Do?) idolatry so common among conservatives. And let’s don’t forget (which is easy to do given subsequent events) that during the brief moment of triumphalism before, during and after the invasion of Iraq, many conservatives engaged in an orgy of messianism about George W. Bush as a towering world-historical figure who was decisively and single-handedly smiting the forces of Islamofascism by deposing Saddam Hussein (another candidate for the Antichrist job in some Christian Right precincts) and creating a pro-American revolution throughout the Middle East and beyond.     

 

 

 

   

When it comes to your garden-variety Antichrist-seekers, of course, no degree of messianic idolatry would qualify a conservative political or religious figure for the Sign of the Beast.  As the pioneering apocalypse-fiction-peddler Hal Lindsay demonstrated in a column just the other day, suspicions of satanic complicity revolve around Obama because of his political ideology and his purported willingness to “apologize” for America before godless foreign audiences, not to mention his refusal to denounce “enemy acroynms” like the U.N. (long associated with the Antichrist in the Christian Right fever swamps). 

What the whole controversy really points to is the enormous spiritual as well as political damage that can be attributed to the sudden and widespread outbreak of dispensationalist enthusiasm in broad swaths of the evangelical community–and even beyond it (as the vast success of the Left Behind novels illustrates)–in recent decades. 

Once limited mainly to a small stratum of premillenialist evangelicals, the abuse of the Book of Revelations as a sort of devout version of Nostradamus has spread like topsy, particularly among biblical literalists who see no irony in their willingness to ascribe all sorts of allegorical meanings to this or that symbol in the book. 

There’s nothing “traditional” or “orthodox” or “conservative” about this point of view, even within evangelical Protestantantism. There’s a long tradition of theological fretting about the speculative excesses that might be associated with Revelations.. Luther once said that “Christ is neither known nor taught in it,” while the Swiss Reformers Calvin and Zwingli generally forbade preachers to interpret it.  Like the less theologically significant but equally popular “War on Christmas” hysteria that has recently enlivened the Christian Right (often among the theological descendants of Calvin and Knox, who at some points in their careers banned the celebration of the Feast of the Nativity as a pagan or papist abomination), Revelations-mining for political insights is an example of the marginal becoming “mainstream.”   

And that leads me to Paul Raushenbush’s brief post today about efforts to de-legitimatize “liberal” Christianity. There’s no question that religious and political conservatives engage in all sorts of myopia and revisionism in mocking liberal Catholics or mainline Protestants as adherents of dying, secularized, “relativistic” cults.  But that’s the nature of agitprop.  What bothers me more is that secular observers–including the MSM–have largely accepted the idea that the only “real” or “traditional” Christians are those holding conservative or even fundamentalist views.  This is evident in the coverage of the ongoing crisis in the Anglican Communion, which is almost invariably described as a “conservative” or “traditonalist” revolt against “liberal” or “radical” innovations.  Rarely do you see any mention of the fact that much of the “revolt” itself stems from a highly self-conscious evangelical movement among Anglicans that predated the gay-bishop controversy, and that often advances a scriputural literalism that’s always been controversial at best among Anglicans (many Anglo-Catholic “traditionalists” either left the Communion earlier over ordination of women, or have stayed out of the current furor). 

The bottom line is that religious progressives, no less than political progressives, need to constantly challenge the assumption that the Right represents sane-and-settled traditions that would be destroyed by a Bishop Robinson, or a President Obama.  There’s nothing inherently conservative, much less reactionary, about Christianity or the United States of America.  And we shouldn’t be bashful about pointing that out. 

 



Advertisement
Comments read comments(2)
post a comment
Reader John

posted August 4, 2008 at 9:23 pm


“Once limited mainly to a small stratum of premillenialist evangelicals, the abuse of the Book of Revelations ….”
I almost stopped reading right there, since my experience has been that people that don’t know the name of that book generally have nothing interesting to say about its interpretation or misinterpretation. But you’re right that there’s nothing traditional or conservative about the kind of [expletive omitted] Hal Lindsey and Tim LaHaye crank out, and that Christendom traditionally has been very guarded about interpreting Revelation. My tradition makes no communal use of it whatever; on no day of the year, at any service, is a reading from it appointed – though it is in our Canon.
OTOH, I resist any religious innovation, be it 19th Century dispensationalism or what you’re pleased to call “progressive” religion. “The faith once delivered to the saints” is my desiderata. Show how your politics fit its theology and anthropology and I’ll listen carefully. Tell me to follow you because you’re “progressive” and I’ll decline, not necessarily politely.



report abuse
 

DS

posted November 6, 2008 at 6:19 pm


“The more obvious problem with McCain’s attacks on Obama’s charisma is simple hypocrisy. No recent presidential candidate in either party has done more to build a cult of personality around himself and his biography…”
Except the Obama campaign of course? How many other candidates have their own brand symbol? But, perhaps this is to be expected of any “brand” spending more dollars on advertising than most major corporations. The amount of money spent on advertising by the Obama campaign qualifies him as a super-brand, very few (the number can probably be counted on one hand easily) major corporations have spent as much advertising themselves as the Obama campaign has spent.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Progressive Revival. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Faith, Media and Culture Prayer, Plain and Simple Happy Blogging!!!  

posted 2:50:10pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Why Jews Around the World are Praying for the Victory of the Egyptian Uprising
Originally appeared on Tikkun Daily BlogEver since the victory over the dictator of Tunisia and the subsequent uprising in Egypt, my email has been flooded with messages from Jews around the world hoping and praying for the victory of the Egyptian people over their cruel Mubarak regime.&nb

posted 1:48:39pm Feb. 01, 2011 | read full post »

When Generosity, Love, and Kindness are Public Policy, the Violence We Saw in Arizona will Dramatically Diminish
The attempted assassination of Congresswoman Giffords and the murder of so many others in Arizona has elicited a number of policy suggestions, from gun control to private protection for elected officials, to banning incitement to violence on websites either directly or more subtly (e.g., Sarah Palin

posted 2:44:04pm Jan. 19, 2011 | read full post »

The Spiritual Messages of Chanukah and Christmas -- and Their Downsides
Christmas and Chanukah share a spiritual message: that it is possible to bring light and hope in a world of darkness, oppression and despair. But whereas Christmas focuses on the birth of a single individual whose life and mission was itself supposed to bring liberation, Chanukah is about a national

posted 12:59:53pm Dec. 02, 2010 | read full post »

Obama (and Biden) Have No Clue About What's Bothering Their Political Base
Shortly before the California Democratic primary in 2008, the San Fransisco Chronicle invited me to write a short article explaining why I, chair of the interfaithNetwork of Spiritual Progressives, was supporting Barack Obama. Like most other progressive activists, I understood that a pres

posted 1:44:11pm Sep. 30, 2010 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.