Pontifications

Pontifications


Hiking salvation: Lost, but how I’m found

posted by David Gibson

Joshua Childers.jpgThe tale of three-year-old Johua Childers, who was lost in the deep Missouri woods with wild things and no food or water for more than two days, riveted the public the way such stories do. As the parent of a similarly-aged kid, I was of course imagining myself in the situation of his parents–and not enjoying it. Fortunately, the boy is okay–he was still being treated Friday, but was well enough to stay in bed and eat baloney and, as ABC reports, to decline to go on “Good Morning America” because, as his father related, “it was too simple for him.”  

Joshua’s simplicity may also have helped save him. I haven’t tramped about the woods as much as I used to, but the most fascinating story I’ve yet seen related to Joshua’s journey is survival expert Ben Sherwood’s column in The Huff Post, Lost & Found: How a Three-Year-Old Survived 52 Hours in the Woods (and How You Can Too). It’s about the science of “lost person behavior,” but sounds a lot like the kind of lore that nobody has anymore:

Expert trackers say that an average person leaves behind two thousand clues for every mile he travels. Each step you take produces evidence — a footprint, a broken twig, a clump of mud, a twisted blade of grass. A team of well-trained searchers spaced ten feet apart usually can detect 95 percent of the useful clues. If they’re spaced fifty feet apart, they’ll discover 75 percent of the clues.

Ken Hill is the world’s foremost authority on the behavior of people who get lost. Hill is a child psychologist at St. Mary’s University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, a densely wooded place once known as the “lost person capital of the world.”

Hill says all you need to know about lost people is their age and their outdoor activity and you can calculate how far they’re likely to travel and where you should go looking. You don’t need a detailed personal history or psychological profile. You just need some basic information. “It is more important to realize that a known percentage of all lost persons is found within a one- or two-mile radius than it is to know how they got there,” he writes.

Hill has interviewed countless people who have gone missing in the woods. He’s looked into their wide eyes and listened to the trembling in their voices. “Fear is the enemy,” he says. “Fear activates the large muscles in the legs.” Lost people want to run. They also lose their heads and sometimes forget even to look in their own backpacks for food and water.

It turns out that no matter where you are in the world, lost people behave in the same way. Who you are determines how far you’re likely to wander.

Read the rest here for who is smartest in the woods (hint: young kids and old folks) and why you should stay put–and few do.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(1)
post a comment
Tom

posted May 9, 2009 at 12:10 pm


“It is more important to realize that a known percentage of all lost persons is found within a one- or two-mile radius than it is to know how they got there,”
And what would that percentage be per say? Forgive me my ignorance as I obviously don’t know. Maybe it really doesn’t matter insofar as I ‘realize’ that a known percentage…



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Pontifications. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Faith, Media and Culture Prayer, Plain and Simple Happy Blogging!!!  

posted 2:38:01pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Moving on, and many, many thanks...
So...my recent vacation and related absences also coincided with an offer from PoliticsDaily.com to cover religion for them, as editor Melinda Henneberger announces here in her roundup on the site's very successful first 100 days. That means, in short, that I'll have to sign off from blogging h

posted 8:29:24pm Aug. 02, 2009 | read full post »

Calvin at 500, Calvinism 2.0
If you thought you knew John Calvin--who turned 500 last week--you probably don't know enough. For example, that he was French, born Jean Cauvin. And if he was in fact scandalized by dancing, he was also a lot more complex than that. I explored the new look Calvin in an essay at PoliticsDaily, "Patr

posted 11:53:35am Jul. 16, 2009 | read full post »

Apologia pro vita sua...Kinda
 In my defense, I've had computer outages and family reunions and a few days of single-parenthood, which is always a bracing reminder of what many parents go through all the time. And this weekend it's off for a week's vacation. Anyway, hence the long absence. Apologies to those who have chec

posted 10:51:36am Jul. 16, 2009 | read full post »

When Benny met Barry: "I'll pray for you!"
The first word via Vatican Radio and first image (that I saw) via Rocco: Speaking to Vatican Radio, Press Office Director Fr. Federico Lombardi said "moral values in international politics, immigration and the Catholic Church's contribution in developing countries" were key topics of discussio

posted 12:54:28pm Jul. 10, 2009 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.