Obama the Conservative

Fairey poster.jpgSince everyone else is honoring the momentous, history-changing and completely fatuous journalistic landmark known as “The First 100 Days Milestone” of a presidency, let me dip my toe in the water. Or rather, let me cite some others who beat me to the deep end with insights–rather than mere scorecards–that I thought genuinely illuminate the often elusive nature of Obama’s personality, and thereby, his presidency.

First off, mirabile dictu, is L’Osservatore Romano, the Vatican daily that titled its analysis “The 100 days that did not shake the world.” As John Thavis reports for CNS, the Vatican paper says Obama has “not confirmed the Catholic Church’s worst fears about radical policy changes in ethical areas” and says the “the new president has operated with more caution than predicted in most areas, including economics and international relations.”


“On ethical questions, too–which from the time of the electoral campaign have been the subject of strong worries by the Catholic bishops–Obama does not seem to have confirmed the radical innovations that he had discussed,” the paper said.

Closer to home, E.J. Dionne has a very good piece (posted here at TNR) in which he recognizes Obama’s eschewing of labels but argues that he goes beyond and beneath a “whatever works” style of deliberate non-ideology. Dionne invokes Richard Hofstadter’s distinction between intelligence and intellect and argues that Obama combines the two:


Intelligence, Hofstadter argued, is an “unfailingly practical quality” that “works within the framework of limited but clearly stated goals.” Intellect, on the other hand, is the mind’s “creative and contemplative side” that “examines, ponders, wonders, theorizes, criticizes, imagines.”    

But the best piece I’ve read is by the New Yorker‘s George Packer, whose commentary a couple weeks back, “Obamaism,” brilliantly captures what for me–and I think much of the public, judging by the polls–is the real appeal of Obama: namely, that despite all the blur of activity and activism, and the infuriating of the left and even more so of the right, Obama is in fact a true conservative:


What underlies so many of Obama’s decisions is an attachment to the institutions that hold up American society, a desire to make them function better rather than remake them altogether. Allowing the auto industry to die would create social havoc in communities around the country, and anything less than de-facto government control seems inadequate. So the President has risked a good deal of his political capital on the largest federal intervention in a sector of the economy since at least 1952, when President Truman seized the steel industry to avert a strike during wartime…Obama may not see a similar need to put the government in charge of the big banks, but he has also shown that he has no taste for such a disruption of the system–even if it were politically possible, and perhaps even if it were the most direct route back to financial health.


In his budget message to Congress, Obama invoked the value of fairness, but his budget proposals don’t create government programs–such as guaranteed-income measures or large numbers of relief jobs–that would establish equality from the top down. Instead, Obama seems to recognize that nothing has shredded the civic fabric in recent years more than the harsh inequalities of finance capitalism and the market ideology of a generation of American politics. This is not the rigid mentality of an engineer of human souls; it’s the attitude of a community organizer.

It’s also a pretty good description of what used to pass for conservatism–a sense that social relations and institutions are fragile things, and that, while government can’t create wealth or impose equality, at moments like this it has to establish a new equilibrium between individuals and huge economic forces, so that society doesn’t crumble.


Packer goes on to critique–ably I’d say–what modern conservatism has become, and also why the Republicans (and I daresay conservative Catholics) are getting no traction with their over-the-top denunciations of Obama. It just doesn’t fit with perceptions of reality. An NYT story the other day about GOP efforts to find a suitable label to denigrate Obama would have been hilarious if not so insidious. Saul Anuzis, who lost a bid to became national party chairman, said the party gained little traction with the “socialist” tag so he is starting to call Obama’s policies “economic fascism.”


“We’ve so overused the word ‘socialism’ that it no longer has the negative connotation it had 20 years ago, or even 10 years ago,” Mr. Anuzis said. “Fascism — everybody still thinks that’s a bad thing.”

Maybe so. But they don’t associate that with Obama. No wonder Arlen Specter went to the Democrats, and polls show the number of self-identified Republicans at a low of 21 percent, about half of those who ID as Democrats and independents. The GOP is re-defining what it means to be a minority in America as much as Barack Obama is.

Comments read comments(8)
post a comment

posted April 29, 2009 at 7:28 pm

It sure does seem like just yesterday Obama was elected, but at the same time it really seems like so much has happened within the short time – from budget plans to pirates to swine flu! They actually did a really cool segment on the TODAY Show this morning that visually takes you through the last 100 days of Obama’s presidency. You can check out the clip on the TODAY Show iPhone app I think:

report abuse


posted April 29, 2009 at 8:47 pm

He’s been a great leader so far. We’re finaly confronting things that are way overdue: healthcare, energy, and even highspeed rail. Whatever the costs, I say bring on the “socialism”! I’ve had enough of the so-called private sector and free market fantasies that have crushed our real spirit long enough.

report abuse


posted April 29, 2009 at 8:49 pm

I think he’s doing a great job, and is actually doing the job I hoped he’d do. He’s amazingly consistent.
Perhaps that comes with intelligence and intellect. Who knew? :)

report abuse


posted April 29, 2009 at 10:53 pm

I think you need a new calender. April Fools Day is long past.
By the way, I thought this was a Catholic blog. It sure seems like a strange place to be worshiping the most rabid anti-life president in our nation’s history.

report abuse


posted April 30, 2009 at 7:47 am

Jadrian –
Your Republican talking points are passe and very much over-done.
To support and admire someone is hardly “worship” … the only people I know who use that word regarding President Obama are his Republican opponents.
Move along.

report abuse


posted May 1, 2009 at 10:13 am

Apparently some of those writers here don’t pay attention to Obama’s push for a one-world government. Didn’t Christ warn us that our wrestling is not against flesh and blood,but against Principalities and the Powers,against the world rulers of this darkness,against the spititual forces of wickedness on high. Perhaps we should pay closer attention to the company Obama keeps and what he believes about life , liberty and the pursuit of happiness.Such a prominant world leader who hasn’t respect for life is a threat to his own people and our government. We should keep things in proper order,God, family. country. God’s laws must come first or we will soon feel His Wrath!

report abuse

Your Name

posted May 1, 2009 at 11:36 am

I used to like reading your columns…..not so much after your comments here… really have no idea of conservatism…or apperently freedom….or with your apparent appreciation of Obama, murder by abortion!

report abuse

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to and may be used by in accordance with the agreements.

Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Pontifications. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Faith, Media and Culture Prayer, Plain and Simple Happy Blogging!!!   ...

posted 2:38:01pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Moving on, and many, many thanks... recent vacation and related absences also coincided with an offer from to cover religion for them, as editor Melinda Henneberger announces here in her roundup on the site's very successful first 100 days. That ...

posted 8:29:24pm Aug. 02, 2009 | read full post »

Calvin at 500, Calvinism 2.0
If you thought you knew John Calvin--who turned 500 last week--you probably don't know enough. For example, that he was French, born Jean Cauvin. And if he was in fact scandalized by dancing, he was also a lot more complex than that. I explored ...

posted 11:53:35am Jul. 16, 2009 | read full post »

Apologia pro vita sua...Kinda
 In my defense, I've had computer outages and family reunions and a few days of single-parenthood, which is always a bracing reminder of what many parents go through all the time. And this weekend it's off for a week's vacation. Anyway, ...

posted 10:51:36am Jul. 16, 2009 | read full post »

When Benny met Barry: "I'll pray for you!"
The first word via Vatican Radio and first image (that I saw) via Rocco: Speaking to Vatican Radio, Press Office Director Fr. Federico Lombardi said "moral values in international politics, immigration and the Catholic Church's ...

posted 12:54:28pm Jul. 10, 2009 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.