Pontifications

Pontifications


Angels & Demons, Howard v. Donohue

posted by David Gibson

Angels & Demons poster.jpgBut which is the Angel and which the Demon? The feud before the May 15 premiere of “Angels & Demons,” the latest film version of a Dan Brown novel is heating up. (My take from last year: Brown is actually a humorist. He’s hilarious, in fact.) But Bill Donohue is not laughing, and neither is director Ron Howard, who has had it with Donohue.

Opie takes a bite out of Donohue at The Huffington Post:

I guess Mr. Donohue and I do have one thing in common: we both like to create fictional tales, as he has done with his silly and mean-spirited work of propaganda…But since Mr. Donohue has, in effect, smeared me by claiming I am smearing his Church, I want him to know this: I have respect for Catholics and their Church, and know they accomplish many good works throughout the world. And I believe Angels & Demons treats the Church with respect — even a degree of reverence — for its traditions and beliefs.

I know faith is believing without seeing (and a boycott would be disbelieving without seeing). But I don’t expect William Donohue to have faith in me, so I encourage him to see Angels & Demons for himself. Then he will finally witness, and perhaps believe, that what I say is true.

And of course Bill hits back:

“Howard must be delusional if he thinks Vatican officials are going to like his propaganda–they denied him the right to film on their grounds. Moreover, we know from a Canadian priest who hung out with Howard’s crew last summer in Rome (dressed in civilian clothes) just how much they hate Catholicism. It’s time to stop the lies and come clean.”

And nothing better than a good mudfight to gin up news coverage–and publicity for whatever you’re selling.

 



Advertisement
Comments read comments(6)
post a comment
Mere Catholic

posted April 22, 2009 at 10:27 pm


Okay, Ron Howard, I’ll take you at your word. If faith is believing without seeing, then I won’t see Angels and Demons and just have faith that it is a good film that respects the Church. As for Bill Donahue, yawn, the DaVinci Code is so yesterday. I hope Tom Hanks has cut his hair for this film. That last do looked like a toupe. Seriously.



report abuse
 

Feel free to stay home.

posted April 23, 2009 at 12:17 am


I love how an apoplectic hack like Donahue can cause such a fuss. So The red-faced storm-trooper thinks a movie is anti-Catholic. So what. He probably thinks Cheerios are anti-Catholic.
If anyone is offended by Browns work, please… feel free to stay home as is your prerogative. Just shut up already. No one cares that you get your knickers knotted over someone else’s fiction.
Grow up already.



report abuse
 

DML

posted April 23, 2009 at 9:35 am


Neither Donahue and Howard have anything of substance to offer, talk about or defend. I saw about 15 minutes of the Da Vinci Code and consider it an affront to cinematic standards. That is the movie’s foremost crime. I simply can not bear to consider seeing this sequel.
Perhaps Donahue and Howard are in on this together to pump up interest for what is surely going to be a poor excuse of a movie. My advice toward any potential moviegoer is the same as Jesus’ advice to Mary Magdelene, “Noli me tangere.”



report abuse
 

Steve T

posted April 23, 2009 at 9:06 pm


Fiction = long fiction.



report abuse
 

Steve T

posted April 23, 2009 at 9:07 pm


correstion.
Novel = long fiction. Mea Culpa



report abuse
 

Jadrian

posted April 25, 2009 at 6:49 pm


Gosh darn (I hope Pa didn’t hear that), Opie is a lousy liar.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Pontifications. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Faith, Media and Culture Prayer, Plain and Simple Happy Blogging!!!  

posted 2:38:01pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Moving on, and many, many thanks...
So...my recent vacation and related absences also coincided with an offer from PoliticsDaily.com to cover religion for them, as editor Melinda Henneberger announces here in her roundup on the site's very successful first 100 days. That means, in short, that I'll have to sign off from blogging h

posted 8:29:24pm Aug. 02, 2009 | read full post »

Calvin at 500, Calvinism 2.0
If you thought you knew John Calvin--who turned 500 last week--you probably don't know enough. For example, that he was French, born Jean Cauvin. And if he was in fact scandalized by dancing, he was also a lot more complex than that. I explored the new look Calvin in an essay at PoliticsDaily, "Patr

posted 11:53:35am Jul. 16, 2009 | read full post »

Apologia pro vita sua...Kinda
 In my defense, I've had computer outages and family reunions and a few days of single-parenthood, which is always a bracing reminder of what many parents go through all the time. And this weekend it's off for a week's vacation. Anyway, hence the long absence. Apologies to those who have chec

posted 10:51:36am Jul. 16, 2009 | read full post »

When Benny met Barry: "I'll pray for you!"
The first word via Vatican Radio and first image (that I saw) via Rocco: Speaking to Vatican Radio, Press Office Director Fr. Federico Lombardi said "moral values in international politics, immigration and the Catholic Church's contribution in developing countries" were key topics of discussio

posted 12:54:28pm Jul. 10, 2009 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.