Pontifications

Pontifications


An evangelical supporter’s disappointment in Obama

posted by David Gibson

David P. Gushee, a well-known and widely-respected ethicist and evangelical voice who supported Barack Obama, expresses what sounds like some buyer’s remorse in a March 16 column at USA Today titled, “Mr. President, we need more than lip service”:

“I knew from the beginning that if Obama took typical Democratic positions on abortion-related issues, this centrist evangelical friendliness toward him and his administration would be tested. I knew that during the campaign he had hewed closely to the standard Democratic pro-choice line. But his party’s platform also promised a commitment to abortion-reduction efforts, and he has echoed that language. Some of us continue to dream that he will roll out a major abortion-reduction initiative. All too familiar Such an initiative has not been offered. But what has occurred are a series of disappointingly typical Democratic abortion-related moves…”

Gushee cites the Mexico City policy reversal, the stem cell decision, the conscience clause regulation reversal, and the Sebelius nomination. And he rues his silence, and his acquiescence in requests for his support against his Christian instincts, especially because he has received little in return.

“…[T]his kind of calculation is precisely what has gotten Christian political activists in trouble in the past, not just for 40 years but for 1,600 years. We gain access to Caesar in order to affect policy; we hold onto access even if it involves compromising some of what we want in policy; in the end, we can easily forget what policies we were after in the first place. I think this definitely happened to the Christian right. It doesn’t need to be repeated by the Christian center or left.”

Gushee still has hope, but as he says, “we need more than lip service on these crucial issues.”

At First Things, Keith Pavlischek wags a finger (and even a tongue) at Gushee for being a mug.

But the Obama Administration ought to listen to its friends rather than just dismissing its foes.   



Advertisement
Comments read comments(3)
post a comment
Michael

posted March 18, 2009 at 11:36 am


Of course, Obama’s friends are the loyal Democrats who have fought for 30 years for civil liberties, responsible public health policy, and protecting a woman’s right to choose. Bowing to pressure from pro-life supporters who have been fairly fickle and disloyal is a slap in the face to those in the party–and the progressive movement–who are committed to responsible public health policy and important research.
I think we need to be careful about staying inside the religious bubble, as if those are the only concerns that matter and those are the only constituencies who need to be given attention. The Bush policy Mexico City, conscience clauses, and stem cells were a slap in the face to liberals and progressives and they expect Obama to reverse them.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted March 18, 2009 at 12:35 pm


The radical religious right are NOT “friends” of the Obama Administration.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted March 19, 2009 at 12:37 am


Interestingly enough, the countries that have the lowest abortion rates are the ones where access to abortion is legal, safe, and protected. I also think that economic issues contribute to the demand for abortion, which seems to be priority #1 with the Obama administration these days (and rightfully so, in my opinion).



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Pontifications. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Faith, Media and Culture Prayer, Plain and Simple Happy Blogging!!!  

posted 2:38:01pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Moving on, and many, many thanks...
So...my recent vacation and related absences also coincided with an offer from PoliticsDaily.com to cover religion for them, as editor Melinda Henneberger announces here in her roundup on the site's very successful first 100 days. That means, in short, that I'll have to sign off from blogging h

posted 8:29:24pm Aug. 02, 2009 | read full post »

Calvin at 500, Calvinism 2.0
If you thought you knew John Calvin--who turned 500 last week--you probably don't know enough. For example, that he was French, born Jean Cauvin. And if he was in fact scandalized by dancing, he was also a lot more complex than that. I explored the new look Calvin in an essay at PoliticsDaily, "Patr

posted 11:53:35am Jul. 16, 2009 | read full post »

Apologia pro vita sua...Kinda
 In my defense, I've had computer outages and family reunions and a few days of single-parenthood, which is always a bracing reminder of what many parents go through all the time. And this weekend it's off for a week's vacation. Anyway, hence the long absence. Apologies to those who have chec

posted 10:51:36am Jul. 16, 2009 | read full post »

When Benny met Barry: "I'll pray for you!"
The first word via Vatican Radio and first image (that I saw) via Rocco: Speaking to Vatican Radio, Press Office Director Fr. Federico Lombardi said "moral values in international politics, immigration and the Catholic Church's contribution in developing countries" were key topics of discussio

posted 12:54:28pm Jul. 10, 2009 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.