Pontifications

Pontifications


Pope’s popularity: Is the thrill gone?

posted by David Gibson

B16 on 15 Aug 08--CNS.jpgThe number of pilgrims and tourists coming to see Benedict XVI is declining steadily, raising alarms about the pontiff’s diminished appeal. According to this CNS story, figures released by the Vatican show that just over 2.21 million people saw Benedict XVI in person in 2008–at the Vatican or the papal villa at Castel Gandolfo, attending his weekly general audience, at a special audience with him, a liturgy he celebrated or his Sunday Angelus address.
That is down from the 2.8 million figure in 2007 and from the more than 3.2 million pilgrims and visitors in 2006, his first full calendar year as pope. In 2004, Pope John Paul II’s last full calendar year as pope, the Vatican said the number of people who attended a papal event was 2.23 million.
Pope-philes were upset at some of the coverage of this trend, in particular this London Times article with the unfortunate hedder, “Crowds shrink for ‘bland’ Benedict, the Pope who only ever says no.” At Catholic World News, Phil Lawler says the newspaper “sneers” at Benedict (well, they’re English, so they sneer at everyone) and that they fail to take into account economic factors and chalk the trend up solely to “the dour pontiff [who] pays the price for his lack of charisma and visibility compared with John Paul II, his showman predecessor.”
As Phil and other defenders note, Benedict doesn’t care about numbers.
The problem is that when Benedict XVI was drawing big crowds early on in his pontificate, many of these same fans were kvelling over the numbers and citing them as proof of Benedict’s appeal and as a finger in the eye to Ratzinger’s critics. Back then they didn’t want to hear about things like the strong economy helping, the proximity to Rome of so many energized German pilgrims, the fact that Benedict could actually speak and hold public audiences, which John Paul had been virtually unable to do for the last couple years of his pontificate. Oh, and the fact that half the people who came to those early papal events of Benedict’s said they were coming as much to visit John Paul’s tomb as to see Benedict.
But Benedict’s fans wouldn’t hear of it then. So complaints now are a bit rich. Live by the sword, as they say…
Of course it’s true, numbers shouldn’t dictate “success” in papal terms, but big crowds–like inflated real estate prices–mesmerized the Vatican, esp during the JP2 years, when the going was good. Benedict was never likely to match such figures, nor should he try. But it’s not something he seems worried about, even if others are.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(3)
post a comment
Charles Cosimano

posted January 7, 2009 at 8:21 pm


This was inevitable. The Papacy is simply returning to its natural state of irrelevancy vis a vi western culture and politics. No one who matters really cares what the Pope says about much of anything. And German tourists can only stand so much pasta before they long for good weinerschnitzel.
Unlike his overestimated predecessor, Benedict is not foolish enough to believe his own press. He is intelligent enough to know that filling a stadium does not translate into anything other than a full stadium.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted January 9, 2009 at 10:07 am


the press will never give this pope a honest comment…they never report on his fantastic talks and writings,,,his brillant mind which actually shocks world leaders…. we here in the usa base so much on polls…well guess what the polls can never be truthful cause they will no allow thjem to be when it come to the church….i wish our american bishops had the guts and focus of benedict…these guys are causing more harm by closing our catholic schools then any sexual scandal….you guys are foolish…



report abuse
 

Bonnie

posted January 19, 2009 at 8:48 am


Since when is moral leadership a personality contest?



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Pontifications. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Faith, Media and Culture Prayer, Plain and Simple Happy Blogging!!!  

posted 2:38:01pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Moving on, and many, many thanks...
So...my recent vacation and related absences also coincided with an offer from PoliticsDaily.com to cover religion for them, as editor Melinda Henneberger announces here in her roundup on the site's very successful first 100 days. That means, in short, that I'll have to sign off from blogging h

posted 8:29:24pm Aug. 02, 2009 | read full post »

Calvin at 500, Calvinism 2.0
If you thought you knew John Calvin--who turned 500 last week--you probably don't know enough. For example, that he was French, born Jean Cauvin. And if he was in fact scandalized by dancing, he was also a lot more complex than that. I explored the new look Calvin in an essay at PoliticsDaily, "Patr

posted 11:53:35am Jul. 16, 2009 | read full post »

Apologia pro vita sua...Kinda
 In my defense, I've had computer outages and family reunions and a few days of single-parenthood, which is always a bracing reminder of what many parents go through all the time. And this weekend it's off for a week's vacation. Anyway, hence the long absence. Apologies to those who have chec

posted 10:51:36am Jul. 16, 2009 | read full post »

When Benny met Barry: "I'll pray for you!"
The first word via Vatican Radio and first image (that I saw) via Rocco: Speaking to Vatican Radio, Press Office Director Fr. Federico Lombardi said "moral values in international politics, immigration and the Catholic Church's contribution in developing countries" were key topics of discussio

posted 12:54:28pm Jul. 10, 2009 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.