On the Front Lines of the Culture Wars

On the Front Lines of the Culture Wars


British electrician refuses to remove his cross

posted by

Calin Atkinson and his palm cross

Colin Atkinson is a Christian. He is also an electrician who works for a non-profit group, the Wakefield District Housing in England.

In his 15 years on the job, he never thought for a moment that the two would clash. But now he is facing the possibility of being fired.

His offense?

For the last decade and a half, he’s kept a palm leaf, folded into the shape of a cross, on the dashboard of the company van he drives.

The palm cross, from a Palm Sunday service he attended in 1996, has been in Atkinson’s van for the entire 15 years he has worked for the non-profit housing organisation.

However, after a single, anonymous complaint from a tenant, he is facing disciplinary action. You see, he refused to remove the cross.

As a result, he is under “investigation” on suspicion of having given offense to “other faiths” — despite the fact that adherents of any other faiths who work for the housing authority are allowed to wear head scarves, beards and turbans. In addition, the Daily Mail newspaper says Atkinson’s boss, Denis Doody, displays in his office a poster of communist Cuban terrorist and revolutionary Che Guevara.

Colin's van and the offending cross

All that is just fine — but not Atkinson’s palm cross.

The housing authority’s written policies allow employees to wear religious symbols and clothing at work. After the complaint, and Atkinson’s refusal to remove the cross, the organization banned all “personal effects” from company vans.

Paul Diamond, a human rights attorney for the Christian Legal Centre is representing him and says that Atkinson is under “huge pressure” from the company to comply.

Atkinson says he is “really shocked and surprised” by the proceedings against him.

“I have always had that cross in my van,” he says. “It’s a symbol of my personal faith. It’s not offensive. It’s in a discrete place and I am acting lawfully.”

Andrea Minichiello Williams of the Christian Legal Centre says the case “smacks of something deeply illiberal and remarkably intolerant.”

Atkinson and his wife

“Freedom of expression now needs to be robustly defended. When a man can’t display a palm cross in his van in a historically Christian country, it should give people serious pause for thought. Is this the kind of society that the British public want to live in?”

Atkinson is also being supported by the former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Carey who called the housing authority’s decision “outrageous.”

“I salute Mr. Atkinson for his bravery and all Christians who quietly stand up for their faith,” Carey said.

A number of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs have also supported Atkinson.

 “I don’t see how anyone can take offence at this cross,” said Niranjan Vakhaira, president of the Hindu Charitable Trust in Leeds. “The employers are definitely in the wrong. Every human being has the right to follow his faith, as long as it doesn’t harm anybody. If it hasn’t harmed anybody then I don’t see the logic in telling him to remove it.’

“We find it difficult to understand why an employer would terminate someone’s employment for having a crucifix in their vehicle,” said a spokesman for the Sikh Education Council. “We suggest the employer should rethink their actions in this particular case.”

The housing authority’s action is on shaky ground, notes journalist Bob Unruh.

A new European court ruling found that a parent who was “offended” by a schoolroom display of a cross cannot demand that it be removed.

The European Court of Human Rights heard a complaint raised by Soile Lautsi on behalf of herself and her two children who opposed the presence of a crucifix in school classrooms in the predominantly Catholic nation of Italy. A lower court had banished the symbols, but the verdict from the Grand Chamber of the European Union court concluded that Italy has the right to determine its own teaching atmosphere.

Colin Atkinson and his palm cross

That ruling is binding on all European Union nations. But will it help Atkinson?

“In deciding to keep crucifixes in the classrooms of the state school attended by the first applicant’s children, the authorities acted within the limits of the margin of appreciation left to the respondent state in the context of its obligation to respect, in the exercise of the functions it assumes in relation to education and teaching, the right of parents to ensure such education and teaching in conformity with their own religious and philosophical convictions,” the ruling said.

 “A loss in this case would have meant, in essence, that it would be illegal under the European Convention on Human Rights to have religious symbols in any state institution anywhere in Europe,” explained Roger Kiska, of the U.S.-based Alliance Defense Fund, which filed a brief in the case.

“That would have set a dangerous example for the rest of the world. For instance, lawsuits that seek to tear down religious symbols simply because one person says he or she has been ‘offended’ are very common in the U.S.”

Recently, a federal court ruled in favor of America’s National Day of Prayer, again finding that there is no constitutional protection against being offended.



  • http://AddaURLtothiscomment Daniel

    Well, that’s Britain’s new ” Nanny State “, a cross is offensive, but Che Guevara or possibly even Chairman Mao’s ” Little Red Book ” is just FINE.
    & anything even remotely considered anti – Islamic or possibly degrading to Islam or Mohammed is verboten.

  • http://AddaURLtothiscomment Elijah Omirin

    it is totally absurd to order an individual to remove the emblem o his belief from the vehicle he drives. If this persecution is allowed to succeed, it means ,then, that the practice of fundamental right to practice his relidous belief is dead in Britain that all believes to be a Christian country. Moreso, where the Queen is the Custodian of the Christian faith. This crude action must not be allowed to go without adequate compensation to the victimised CH

  • http://Why? Jessica

    Why is being a Christian such a terrible thing? When did this start? Oh my what a World!

  • http://AddaURLtothiscomment Susan Lake

    I believe everyone has the right to practice their religion. I alsp believe that God will guide and protect those who hold tight to their faith. If you truly beleive do not give in, hold your faith and God in your heart. God be with all those who believe in you.

  • http://www.lancelawshe.com Lance

    First I do think what the employer did was wrong. They should have just let things be, and see if any more complaints would have came in. On the flip side, a religious symbol displayed does not always please the Lord, but faith does. Live out the Christian faith, in your word, actions, and deeds, and no employer can keep you from your work, or tear down your faith, because it’s a part of your life, and not just a symbol displayed on your vehicle.

    If it were me I probably would have removed the cross, because it is their company vehicle and not my property. I would have just tried much more to live a Christian life, so that symbols of my faith would not be necessary.

    Jesus never forced his self upon anyone, or stayed where he wasn’t welcomed. He actually gave us direction…”shake the dust off our feet as a testimony unto them…”

    In love with Jesus and I hope it shows.

  • http://AddaURLtothiscomment SHEILA

    what so wrong about a small cross? can’t anybody now show Jesus to the world with out the world taking offense? or its just that the devil is openly fighting for his place in the world that lots and lots are deceived.

  • http://AddaURLtothiscomment Spring

    All this because of one single complaint??? I find that outrageous. You go Mr. Atkinson. God Bless You!

  • http://AddaURLtothiscomment Vincent Yanne

    I think the state and Mr. Atkinson’s employer should look at what is real in peoples lives what ever happened to freedom of religion

  • http://AddaURLtothiscomment Donald Moore

    So here’s my big question…..
    When he visits homes to work on electrical issues, do the TENANTS have to put away signs of THEIR faith, change clothing, etc? Why is it that Christians always get the heave-ho but for everyone else it do whatever you want??!!
    Next- Was his van sitting in someone’s living room??!! This seem like a silly question but really, I cannot see how if his van is parked at the curb and locked, that there would be an issue. Everytime a workman has come to my home, I’m usually watching what’s going on…NOT rooting around his/her van.

  • http://AddaURLtothiscomment Shay

    You stand your ground Atkinson! I want one of those shirts, is there a way to order them? My youth group would wear those for sure.

Previous Posts

President Obama fails key test for Antichrists: confesses Jesus is Lord
President Barack Obama passed a key test Monday night in case anybody is worried that he is the Antichrist. Speaking at a campaign fundraiser at the House of Blues in Los Angeles, Obama was interrupted by a man identified as David Serrano who repeatedly yelled that "Jesus is God." As Se

posted 7:53:12pm Sep. 28, 2011 | read full post »

Michael Moore: America would welcome a fat president such as Chris Christie
Asked by Joy Behar onHeadline News whether America would vote for a "fat" candidate for President, controversial film-maker Michael Moore, who has never been accused of being too skinny, responded that most of America is fat and would probably identify with an overweight Commander-in-Chief. Histo

posted 10:27:30am Sep. 28, 2011 | read full post »

ACLU, Planned Parenthood combine to fight Mississippi constitutional amendment
Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union have joined forces to create the pro-abortion “Mississippians for Healthy Families” with a goal of defeating a constitutional amendment limiting abortion in the Magnolia State. Christine Dhanagom of LifeSiteNews writes that "Yes on

posted 11:55:16am Sep. 27, 2011 | read full post »

Scientists tell pollsters religion and science not irreconcilable
Are there irreconcilable differences between faith and science? Not in the opinion of prominent scientists who participated in a five-year study by Rice University. Researchers there found that only a minority of scientists questioned at major research universities say that religion and scien

posted 3:13:07pm Sep. 23, 2011 | read full post »

Wikileaks: U.S. Embassy criticized Catholic influences on Poland
U.S. Embassy officials in Warsaw, Poland, under the Obama administration complained that Catholic Church doctrine is a major source of “homophobia” in the heavily Catholic country, according to diplomatic cables released by Wikileaks. The messages from the American embassy in Poland's capit

posted 3:51:00pm Sep. 08, 2011 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.