O Me of Little Faith

O Me of Little Faith

Clark Pinnock: Rest in Peace

clarkpinnock.jpgClark Pinnock was one of the first real theologians I ever read, and definitely one of the most controversial. I hadn’t thought of him in awhile, but was saddened to hear of his unexpected passing on Sunday, August 15, from a heart attack. Back in March, he revealed he had also been suffering from Alzheimer’s disease.

Pinnock was just 73, and he died too early. Here’s an obituary from Christianity Today.


In my last semesters of college, I took a couple of religion classes as electives. Based on several long faith discussions with my professor — a Catholic priest and the director of the Catholic Student Center at my university (he’s still a good friend today, btw) — he recommended that I read a couple of Pinnock’s books. So I did. The first was Unbounded Love: Good News Theology for the 21st Century, which Pinnock wrote with Robert Brow.

I then went on to read The Openness of God: A Biblical Challenge to the Understanding of God, to which Pinnock contributed and edited, along with Pinnock’s own A Wideness in God’s Mercy: The Finality of Jesus Christ in a World of Religions.


I’m revealing my theological nerdage here, but reading that series of books — and I went through them all in a row, over four or five weeks — was one of my best reading experiences ever. I loved Pinnock. His theology was challenging and I didn’t always agree with it, but I loved how passionate he was about the Bible. His passion fed and deepened my own, as did his openness to ask hard questions and consider different perspectives.

Pinnock will primarily be remembered for his work as one of the primary advocates of “open theism,” in which he believed that God limited his own knowledge as he dealt with humanity. In other words, God wasn’t all-knowing, by choice. He kept himself from knowing the future. So, in Pinnock’s view, God could be surprised, God could regret, and God could change his mind. In fact, he’s depicted doing these things in several Old Testament stories. In that vein, Pinnock based this highly controversial viewpoint on Scripture — especially the passages that people read and didn’t understand because they didn’t match up to our preconceived ideas of God’s sovereignty and omniscience.


Calvinists hated Pinnock, as you might expect. They thought he was a heretic and they thought open theism was a dangerous idea that undermined the character of God. If you Google “Clark Pinnock” right now I guarantee one of the top 10 links will be something denouncing him and talking about his descent into theological error. Pinnock was the source of a huge amount of controversy and tension within the Evangelical Theological Society, which tried (and failed, by a narrow vote) to kick him out in 2002.

But this wasn’t just some rogue theologian making stuff up about God to fit some personal, selfish agenda. Pinnock was committed to the Bible. One of his first books, back in 1967, was called In Defense of Biblical Infallibility. He came from a fundamentalist background. His theology was fluid, always expanding, and was not axe-grinding but an attempt to make sense of the Bible — especially the parts that seemed to contradict the traditional, orthodox idea of omniscience.


That’s what I appreciated most about Pinnock: he didn’t get paralyzed by the questions, but instead let his questions propel him to new ideas and, yes, to change. He began his theological career as a Calvinist and a strict believer in biblical innerrancy. At New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary he became a mentor of Paige Patterson, who led the fundamentalist takeover of the Southern Baptist Convention back in the 1980s. But it wasn’t long until Pinnock’s theology pushed him away from conservatism and into the theological left, where at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School he became a mentor to Jim Wallis.

Yes, that Jim Wallis. Quick: name someone else who mentored both Paige Patterson and Jim Wallis.

I can’t, and that’s significant. Pinnock swung from fundamentalism in the 1960s to liberal, social theology in the 1970s and ended up somewhere in the middle — anathema to both sides.


The Christianity Today obituary offered this quote from him: “Not only am I often not listened to, I am also made to feel stranded
theologically: being too much of a free thinker to be accepted by the
evangelical establishment and too much of a conservative to be accepted
by the liberal mainline.”

He was also not afraid to admit that he’d been wrong, and his views had changed. That’s a mature perspective, and it’s one I appreciate.

Pinnock influenced me because his work addressed many of the questions I was having about God. He took seriously passages of Scripture which seemed to contradict the traditional ideas I was struggling with, and attempted to explain them — even if his explanations took him to a new and uncomfortable place.


Here’s what I learned from Pinnock:

1) what I’d grown up believing about God wasn’t always supported by the whole Bible

2) that there were other ways of thinking about God that could be arrived at by reading the same Bible — if you could read it without prejudice

3) mentioning these alternative views really made some Christians angry, and even if you did it passionately and faithfully, those Christians would try to kick you out of their groups

I’m not a Calvinist, nor am I an open theist. But I’m a Clark Pinnock fan. And some Christians will probably think I’m suspect just because I’m admitting my admiration for him. It’s our own stupid version of guilt by association.


But I don’t care. Pinnock was a highly influential writer, teacher, and scholar. We’ll miss his voice. We’ll miss his theology. And we’ll miss his example.

The complete text of his book, Unbounded Love, is available here online.

And here’s an informative, detailed bio of him by Michael L. Westmoreland-White.

Comments read comments(9)
post a comment
Jim F.

posted August 18, 2010 at 11:47 am

Enjoyed the article Jason – thanks for sharing it.

report abuse

Brandon G. Smith

posted August 18, 2010 at 12:42 pm

I think most open theists would say that God is all-knowing, its that the He created the future in a way that is impossible for even an omniscient being to know exhaustively. He does know the future as a realm of possibilties, however.
But, Clark Pinnock was a maverick. My favorite thing about him was that he wasn’t afraid to change his views when he found something in the Bible that he felt didn’t line up with them. Most people just ignore those areas or come up with fanciful ways to explain them away.
Great post, Jason. RIP, Clark.

report abuse

Charlie Chang

posted August 18, 2010 at 1:57 pm

So had to add The Openness of God: A Biblical Challenge to the Understanding of God to my Amazon cart.

report abuse

Rachel H. Evans

posted August 18, 2010 at 3:03 pm

Thanks for this great tribute, Jason. Pinnock was a critical voice in my own faith journey as well. I even wrote him a letter thanking him for “A Wideness in God’s Mercy,” which gave me hope for the first time that maybe God wasn’t vengeful and cruel after all. I love what you said about his humility and his willingness to change his mind.

report abuse

Charlie's Church of Christ

posted August 18, 2010 at 3:13 pm

Dude Jason for real you’d even think of semi-supporting an Open Theist? I have just unsubscribed to your blog. I’m out.
Okay not really I simply find it funny when people freak out over this subject. I have seen churches that have hosted Greg Boyd to speak (about topics TOTALLY unreleated to open theism) get verbally slaughtered for it. As if that one view taints all else… Anyway end of tangent.
Jason I’m interested in reading Pinnock now – are they difficult books to read through (as in academic style)?

report abuse

Jason Boyett

posted August 18, 2010 at 3:17 pm

No, they’re not overly dense, or academic. Pinnock was a teacher at heart, and he writes in a very accessible manner.

report abuse

John C

posted August 18, 2010 at 6:58 pm

I always admired Pinnock’s willingness to engage the text. He was clearly hurt personally by some of the attacks leveled against him for his openness view, and I always admired his willingness to interact with the biblical text. I am not an open theist (and not a Calvinist either), and I disagree with Pinnock’s conclusions in that respect. But I have always admired his pursuit of biblical truth, and you hit that on the head.

report abuse


posted August 19, 2010 at 3:06 pm

could it be than any time someone is honest about their beliefs and doubts that they will come under attack?
and… what difference does it make when it is honest rather than “ax-grinding,” “power-and-attention-seeking” commentary?

report abuse

Steve McKinzie

posted October 28, 2010 at 4:21 pm

What’s this, Calvinists hated Pinnock. Heck, that isn’t the way we felt about the old guy at all. I have always liked Pinnock. It is true that I lamented his departure from orthodoxy and his foolish infatuation with Open Theology. Admit it, the guy was way off base there, but I (Calvinist though I am) never hated him. Pinnock was a follower of Christ and he tried, I believe, to fashion a theology on what he sensed was true from Scripture, however, mistaken some of his conclusions may have been.
I first met Pinnonck, so to speak, at an outdoor evangelistic push at the University of Texas in the spring of 1971. We had Pinnock out in front of the student center on a loud speaker defending the faith. Later a pastor friend of mine in Texas said that Pinnock at New Orleans Baptist Seminary was absolutely fascinating and inspiring, and you know, I read his earlier apolgetic work, Set Forth Your Case, tenaciously. Pinnock always had worthwhile things to say.
No, I don’t rejoice at Pinnock’s passing, and I bear him no ill will. I respect the man as a humble follower of Christ — however much he may have erred and however much he may have misunderstood God’s sovereignty. May he rejoice in his savior.

report abuse

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to and may be used by in accordance with the agreements.

Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting O Me Of Little Faith. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Red Letters with Tom Davis Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent ...

posted 2:25:22pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Farewell, O Me of Little Faith
You said you had a big announcement coming today. What is it? The announcement is this: Right now you are reading the final post on this blog. Ever. Ever? Ever. So you're shutting this blog down? Well, I'm going to stop writing ...

posted 6:11:49am Jun. 01, 2011 | read full post »

My Introvert Interview
On Monday, author Adam McHugh delivered a guest post about the "snarling 8-headed monster" of the writing process. Today I return the favor -- sort of -- via an interview at his blog, Introverted Church. We talk about how my introverted ...

posted 3:05:36pm May. 25, 2011 | read full post »

Harold Camping: "Invisible Judgment Day"
When the rapture didn't occur as predicted on May 21, 2011, Harold Camping had a few options. Here is how he could have responded to the failed prediction, in descending levels of crazy: 1. He could announce that he was wrong. This is the ...

posted 9:06:24am May. 24, 2011 | read full post »

The Phases of Writing (Adam McHugh)
If you've ever felt out of place among all the exciting, expressive, emotional enthusiasm of a contemporary church service...or an evangelist's demands that you need to constantly be sharing your faith boldly to strangers...if it simply wipes ...

posted 7:46:00am May. 23, 2011 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.