O Me of Little Faith

O Me of Little Faith

Interview with Tess Mallory (Part 1)

Last week’s unrelated posts on worship and forbidden words in Christian romances hit a wide audience and brought a lot of new traffic to this blog, and as a result I’ve been able to connect with some interesting new people. (Good job, Internets!) One of those is Tess Mallory, a fellow Texan. Tess makes her living as a romance novelist. A romance novelist who is a Christian…but not a “Christian romance novelist.”

And there is a difference, as you’ll see.

Since I like to use this space occasionally to talk to other writers about writing, I asked Tess if she’d mind being interviewed. She graciously obliged, and has some great things to say about being a Christian in an industry — romantic fiction — I don’t know much about. You’ll enjoy it.

First, a quick bio from Tess Mallory is the author of five time travel romances, a fantasy romance novella, and a futuristic romance. These include Highland Rogue, Highland Magic, Highland Dream, and Highland Fling (plus several others without “Highland” in the title). Tess lives in the Texas Hill Country with her husband and family, and when she’s not writing, she enjoys painting, creating designs with mosaic tiles, drinking foamy lattes and playing Scrabble.

JB: Hi, Tess. Thanks for doing the interview.

Tess Mallory: Hi Jason! Thanks so much for interviewing me. I love your blog. It always makes me think — and laugh!

Thank you. That’s always good to hear. Let’s talk about romantic fiction. Even though my dad attended high school with Jodi Thomas, I’m pretty far removed from the romance-writing world. What do I need to know about it?

The romance genre actually began in the early 19th century, when Jane Austen, the Brönte sisters, and other female writers of the day began creating stories that revolved around the relationships of men and women. But what most non-romance-reading people today still consider romance novels are either the small, category romances published by Harlequin, or more likely the romances that rose to popularity in the seventies. These books were often badly written and featured domineering men (sometimes rather violent) and submissive females. These books, with their “clinch” covers, helped cement the term “bodice rippers,” which has followed the romance genre ever since.

Um…you’re right. That’s exactly what I think about when I think about romance. I’m guessing I’m wrong? Please say yes.

Yes! In the late eighties, a new kind of romance reader, and writer, came to fruition. Strong female heroines — paired with strong, caring heroes — soon became the heart of the romance. A weak woman dependent on a man for her life and self-esteem, or an alpha male diminishing his woman with his arrogance, were banished to the past. Personal growth, self-confidence, empowerment, and independence became part and parcel of the romance novel, and these concepts have expanded and grown to the present day. Unfortunately, the present-day detractors of romance have most likely never read a present-day romance, and usually base their opinions on the stereotype of romances from the 70s.

Guilty. Not that I read romances or anything in the 1970s. In the 1970s, I was reading the Hardy Boys. What else can you tell me?

Well, writing a romance novel is just as hard as writing any other kind of novel, as is getting it published. The only reason it may be easier to get a romance published than other novels is because every major publishing house has at least one line of romance and usually several. There is a wide and I do mean W-I-D-E variety of romances out there in today’s market, as well as a wide variety of styles, authors, and content. Some are good, some are bad. Some are frivolous, some are heartfelt. Some are hot, some are not. Some even talk about God. Some talk about Satan. Just like in mainstream, science fiction, fantasy, thriller, horror, or even literary fiction, whether or not a romance is a good book depends not only on the talent of the author, but the subjective tastes of the reader, of course.

But there are specific rules that a book has to follow in order to be an official “romance,” right?

Yes. Here’s what the Romance Writers of America organization considers a romance: It has to have a central love story — you can include as many subplots as you want as long as the love story is the main focus. And it has to have “an emotionally satisfying and optimistic ending.”

Define the “emotionally satisfying and optimistic ending.” What does that mean?

Here’s how the RWA defines it: In a romance, the lovers who risk and struggle for each other and their relationship are rewarded with emotional justice and unconditional love.

They also say this: Romance novels may have any tone or style, be set in any place or time, and have varying levels of sensuality—ranging from sweet to extremely hot. These settings and distinctions of plot create specific subgenres within romance fiction.

Here are some more fun facts: Romance fiction generated $1.37 billion in sales in 2008. It was the top performing category on the New York Times, USA Today, and Publishers Weekly best-seller lists. 74.8 million people read at least one romance novel in 2008. Romance fiction sales are estimated at $1.36 billion for 2009.

Wow. How did you get into this career? Can you give us the brief back story?

Brief? Me? It’s a convoluted story, but I’ll try. I never started out to write a romance, at least not in the beginning. I started my first book in the seventh grade. It was a western, and I remember the rush of joy I felt when I wrote the opening sentence and it actually sounded like something I would read in a “real” book. I ran out of steam on the fourth chapter, but the seed was planted, and somehow I knew I wanted to write novels.

I grew up, got married, started a family, and when I was in my early twenties, my grandmother gave me a copy of Matched Pearls, a Christian romance by Grace Livingston Hill. These roman
ces were set and written in the 1920s, 30s, and 40s. When I had read all of GLH’s books, I began to read secular romances. I was a die-hard romantic, fascinated with Ireland and Scotland, where many of the historical romances I read were set. I began to think about writing romances.

In the meantime, I had written a different kind of book — a Young Adult time travel (yes, I was a geek, a romantic geek). I had been fascinated with time travel — the paradoxes, the questions, the possibilities — ever since I saw Back to the Future, Somewhere in Time, and an episode of Star Trek. (Yes, I was a Trekkie too. A romantic, geeky, Trekkie.) Then I read a book by Jude Devereaux called A Knight in Shining Armor — one of the first time-travel romances ever written — and I became hooked on the idea of combining love and science fiction. So I wrote a time-travel adventure for the Young Adult market and called it Jewels of Time.

But I was new at this game, and when I finished the book and looked around for a publisher to submit it to, I found out I had goofed. This book was not really a YA. The ages of the main characters were just a little too old, and it was way too romantic for a YA novel. (At the time. Boy, if only Twilight had been around then, I’d have had a market for it!). I chalked it up to a learning experience and put the manuscript under my bed.

Not long after, while reading Romantic Times magazine, I saw a blurb that made my heart beat faster — Dorchester Publishing in New York was looking for manuscripts for time-travel romances! BOING! I got out my YA, rewrote it, and sent it to Dorchester. They bought it. I couldn’t believe it. I had sold a book! Then I sold Dorchester another TT. And another. And suddenly I had a career as a romance author.

So far I’ve written eight romance novels and one novella which include seven time-travel romances, one futuristic romance, and one novella included in a romance fantasy anthology. The last two books were with Berkley (Penguin/Putnam Books) and I’m working on the third in the trilogy. I’ve also written stories for Highlights for Children, several plays, a Christian musical, a children’s musical (lyrics and book), and have written human interest features for a variety of small-town Texas newspapers over the years.

Your recent work takes on something of a sci-fi/paranormal theme. What’s behind that?

I’ve always loved science fiction and fantasy, largely because of my father. My dad was an engineer for General Dynamics, and loved SF. One of the first bedtime stories I ever remember him reading me was I, Robot. I loved Robby the Robot. I still love robots. My dad also invented his own tales of fairies and dragons for me, and I grew up with a love of fantasies and science fiction and storytelling. It makes sense that there are very few ideas that come to me now as a writer that don’t have some kind of SF or fantasy twist to them. Paranormal is a new toy to play with, but more on that later.

When I got serious about my writing as an adult, one of my first goals was to write a Star Trek novel! I did eventually submit one and got good feedback, but was ultimately turned down, so I decided to write the “book of my heart” — a futuristic Christian novel. I was so excited when Thomas Nelson Books asked to read it. They kept it for two years before they finally turned it down. That was quite a disappointment. (I still like that book and plan to rewrite it one of these days.)

What are the biggest misconceptions about romantic fiction?

How about I give you bullet points?

Go for it.

  • Romances are still like they were in the seventies, where many times the heroine was subjected to basically what amounted to sexual assault. Hence the term “bodice-ripper.”
  • All romances are pornographic.
  • All romances focus primarily on sex and sexual desire.
  • All romances are badly written.
  • All romances are trashy.
  • All romances have no plot.
  • All romances contain sex.
  • Only uneducated people read romances.
  • Only uneducated people write romances.
  • Authors of romances are rich.
  • It’s easy to get a romance published.
  • It’s easy to write a romance.
  • Women read romances because they are frustrated with their husbands, and/or their sex lives.
  • Romance writers are wild and promiscuous. (We aren’t. I promise. We are mostly stay-at-home moms and grandmothers.)
  • Romance writers have lucky husbands.


Thanks, Tess. Come back tomorrow for part two of our interview, in which Tess and I discuss snobbery from other writers toward her genre, and she dishes on the stereotypical cheesecake cover art. Also on the menu? The challenges of being a Christian who writes romance novels for a secular publisher, and whether or not her characters have sex.

Yes. I am such a tease.

Comments read comments(15)
post a comment

posted November 12, 2009 at 11:35 am

This is very interesting. I always love to read about Christian authors who write for a secular audience. And it's even more fascinating that it's the romance novel genre. Can't wait to read tomorrow's blog. Thank you Tess!

report abuse

Tess Mallory

posted November 12, 2009 at 1:42 pm

Thanks Janna! I appreciate your comment so much! ;) Come back tomorrow to hear the rest!

report abuse


posted November 12, 2009 at 2:04 pm

Very interesting and enlightening! I can't wait to read next week's part!

report abuse

Kathy (Queenie)

posted November 12, 2009 at 2:10 pm

This was an awesome and interesting interview! Tess…I thought I already knew all about you but I learned SO much more! Like the others…I can't wait to read Part 2. Also, good luck on your next project.

report abuse

Dan Lewis

posted November 12, 2009 at 2:18 pm

So Jason, when are you and Tess going to start collaborating and write the Pocket Guide to Romance Novels? Hee, hee.

report abuse

Tess Mallory

posted November 12, 2009 at 2:27 pm

@ Dan Lewis Aw, Dan, now you ruined our surprise announcement! hee hee! :)But at least I can still make this announcement: Jason has agreed to pose for the cover of my next Highland romance book! Okay, he didn't. And I was even going to call it Highland Christian!

report abuse

Jason Boyett

posted November 12, 2009 at 2:44 pm

That's great news, Tess. I am at the gym right now working on my pecs. Later I'm being fitted for my first kilt. "Highland Writer" has a certain ring to it. I could have a pen clutched in my shiny white teeth.

report abuse

Mary Lou

posted November 12, 2009 at 2:52 pm

Sounds good! :-) Seriously, great interview! Can't wait for part 2!

report abuse

Muddled Mawkishness and Murky Musings

posted November 12, 2009 at 2:53 pm

This is great! Can't wait to see the rest of the interview. And I can't wait to go find some of those books… Was also neat to hear you come from a place that is dear to my heart.:) We used to live in the Texas hill country and miss it tons.

report abuse

Tess Mallory

posted November 12, 2009 at 3:22 pm

Jason, I'm absolutely thrilled. Of course you'll have to send a picture of those pecs to the publisher to see if they live up to the fine standard of romance covers! :) Highland Writer — I love it! You could have a giant quill pen at your side and go around saying things like "The pen is mightier than the sword!" Oh Oh! – and then you could ERASE the bad guys and save the girl! But then it would have to be a pencil and then the quote wouldn't work. Hmmmm. This will take some thought.

report abuse

Tess Mallory

posted November 12, 2009 at 3:23 pm

Hey Murky Musings! Yeah, the Hill Country has it's drawbacks, especially in the summer, but this time of year it is the absolute best place to live! Thanks for stopping by to read the interview!

report abuse

Gail Dayton

posted November 12, 2009 at 6:09 pm

Now–romance writers DO have lucky husbands! This much is true. I tell mine he's lucky to have me all the time. ;)Wanted to give a shout-out to Jason. Lived in Clarendon (you know where it is) up till 2 years ago till we trekked 3/4 of the way across the state to Galveston. Miss the people. Not so much the cold. ;) Have a great Jodi Thomas story… She is, like, the nicest person in the universe, or darn close.

report abuse


posted November 12, 2009 at 8:38 pm

Can't wait for the rest of the interview. Verrrrry interesting.I love all your books Tess.Men….watch out for those stay-at-home mom and grandma romance writers, they are sizzlin' on the inside and it just has to come out!

report abuse


posted November 12, 2009 at 8:42 pm

Great interview, Tess! And let everyone know that Time Travel is the BEST genre there is! Looking forward to hearing MORE about my Tess Mallory!

report abuse

Tess Mallory

posted November 13, 2009 at 12:54 am

Thanks everyone for reading the interview! :) Erin – you said you couldn't wait to read next week's part, but girl, the second part is tomorrow! Don't miss it! :))

report abuse

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to and may be used by in accordance with the agreements.

Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting O Me Of Little Faith. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Red Letters with Tom Davis Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!

posted 2:25:22pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Farewell, O Me of Little Faith
You said you had a big announcement coming today. What is it? The announcement is this: Right now you are reading the final post on this blog. Ever. Ever? Ever. So you're shutting this blog down? Well, I'm going to stop writing any new posts for it. But the blog will still be here. Th

posted 6:11:49am Jun. 01, 2011 | read full post »

My Introvert Interview
On Monday, author Adam McHugh delivered a guest post about the "snarling 8-headed monster" of the writing process. Today I return the favor -- sort of -- via an interview at his blog, Introverted Church. We talk about how my introverted personality has impacted my faith and doubt, and how the extrov

posted 3:05:36pm May. 25, 2011 | read full post »

Harold Camping: "Invisible Judgment Day"
When the rapture didn't occur as predicted on May 21, 2011, Harold Camping had a few options. Here is how he could have responded to the failed prediction, in descending levels of crazy: 1. He could announce that he was wrong. This is the most reasonable option and was therefore unexpected. I wou

posted 9:06:24am May. 24, 2011 | read full post »

The Phases of Writing (Adam McHugh)
If you've ever felt out of place among all the exciting, expressive, emotional enthusiasm of a contemporary church service...or an evangelist's demands that you need to constantly be sharing your faith boldly to strangers...if it simply wipes you out to be surrounded by people all the time,  then y

posted 7:46:00am May. 23, 2011 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.