Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News


Is there anything to all the buzz on Twitter about Obama’s weekend executive order?

Has President Barack Obama quietly given himself dictatorial powers over the weekend — new authority to nationalize much of the country’s national resources? To draft citizens into a non-military corps?

Obama signs a measure into law

That’s the buzz – particularly on Twitter over an Executive Order that Obama signed Friday afternoon.

“NYTFury” tweeted: “Obama signs Executive Order Allowing for Control Over All U.S. Resources. GOD HELP US.”

“WillF” tweeted: “ While many of my friends worry about a right-wing takeover of the US, did Obama just sign an Executive Order allowing dictatorship?”

“D_Seaman” commented: “REMINDER: an Executive Order from FDR allowed Japanese Americans to be detained without trial during WW II. Exec Orders can be powerful.”

President Franklin D. Roosevelt's order to Japanese-Americans

Is all the alarm justified? What is going on?

“Twitter is buzzing with controversy over the new Executive Order signed by President Barack Obama on Friday, March 16, 2012,” writes blogger Kyle Merriam. “The order was posted on WhiteHouse.gov, but many people heard on Twitter, responding with outrage that Obama may have signed an order that allows a dictatorship in the event of an emergency or war.

“Check it out. It’s a jawdropper. It calls for a draft, but not just a draft. A civilian draft, of ‘persons of outstanding experience or ability’ without compensation. If they think they need you, they can compel you to work for the government for nothing.

“They can, under this order, restrict civilian travel by any mode, including (probably) foot travel. They can ration food. They can restrict water usage, even from private wells. They can ration any and all drugs, including OTC and vitamins. They can collectivize farms. They can take over all energy production, including home solar units.

“It also allows for drafting civilians. If they have need of your skills, they can compel you to work for no compensation.”

World War II military draftees

Is that what the executive order really says?

In an article headlined “Conservatives Are Freaking Out Over An Executive Order That May Give Obama Complete Control Over The Economy,” Business Insider‘s Michael Brendan Dougherty quips that “no two news sources can agree on what it means.

Indeed, he points out, the Drudge Report linked to it under the title, “Martial Law? White House issues executive order: “National Defense Resources Preparedness …”

On the left side of the aisle, the Huffington Post’s Edwin Black says the president’s action puts the United States on a “war footing.”

“So what is in this document?” asks Dougherty. “It’s based in part on the Defense Production Act of 1950, which mobilized America for the Korean War.

During the Korean War, President Truman signed a similar executive order

“Basically that law granted the Executive branch of government broad authority in the economy: to compel businesses to sign contracts to produce goods for the national defense, to set wage and price controls, especially on raw materials, and to even requisition property that might be useful for national defense.

“The Act,” writes Dougherty, ”has been reauthorized and passed through Congress many times, most recently in 2008 by President Bush, who had previously re-authorized it in 2003. President Clinton did the same in 1994.”

Bill Clinton signed a similar executive order

However, this time, it has caused enormous concern:

“President Barack Obama issued an Executive Order on March 16 giving the White House absolute control over all the country’s natural resources in case of a natural disaster or during a time of war,” writes Joe Wolverton for the right-of-center New American magazine. “In the order, the National Defense Resources Preparedness Order, the President granted to himself the authority to approve the dispensing of all domestic energy, production, transportation, food, and water supplies as he deems necessary to protect national security.”

The Executive Order “also contains a vague reference in regards to harnessing American citizens to fulfill ‘labor requirements’ for the purposes of national defense,” notes Brandon Turbeville of the website Global Research. “Not only that, but the authority claimed inside the Executive Order does not only apply to National Emergencies and times of war. It also applies in peacetime.”

Chris Kitze of the website Before It’s News, explains: “This Executive Order was posted on the WhiteHouse.gov web site on Friday, March 16, 2012, under the name National Defense Resources Preparedness. In a nutshell, it gives the president the power to take just about anything deemed necessary for ‘National Defense,’ whatever they decide that is. It’s peacetime, because as the title of the order says, it’s for ‘Preparedness.’

“Under this order the heads of these cabinet level positions; Agriculture, Energy, Health and Human Services, Transportation, Defense and Commerce can take food, livestock, fertilizer, farm equipment, all forms of energy, water resources, all forms of civil transportation (meaning any vehicles, boats, planes), and any other materials, including construction materials from wherever they are available. This is probably why the government has been visiting farms with GPS devices, so they know exactly where to go when they turn this one on.”

Kenneth Schortgen Jr., writing in the Finance Examiner newspaper, writes, “Executive Orders created for national defense and national preparedness are not new in American history, but in each instance they brought about a Constitutional crisis that nearly led standing Presidents to hold dictatorial power over the citizenry.”

Calm down, writes Ed Morrissey at the website HotAir:

“We’re getting a lot of e-mail this weekend about an executive order issued on Friday afternoon by President Obama titled ‘National Defense Resources Preparedness.’ While the timing of the Executive Order is curious — why send it out on a Friday afternoon when an administration is usually trying to sneak bad news past the media? — the general impact of it is negligible. This Executive Order simply updates another Executive Order (12919) that had been in place since June 1994, and amended several times since.

“Let’s start with Friday’s Executive Order:

“Section 101. Purpose. This order delegates authorities and addresses national defense resource policies and programs under the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (the ‘Act’).

“Sec. 102. Policy. The United States must have an industrial and technological base capable of meeting national defense requirements and capable of contributing to the technological superiority of its national defense equipment in peacetime and in times of national emergency. The domestic industrial and technological base is the foundation for national defense preparedness. The authorities provided in the Act shall be used to strengthen this base and to ensure it is capable of responding to the national defense needs of the United States.

“Sounds dramatic, doesn’t it?” asks Morrissey. “ This actually matches the language in Executive Order 12919, however, even the part about ‘in peacetime.’ Note what this Executive Order specifically orders: identify, assess, be prepared, improve, foster cooperation.

“ None of these items claim authority to seize private property and place them at the personal disposal of Obama.”

The order says the President can invoke the powers of this order to “meet national defense requirements” in “the full spectrum of emergencies.”

Presidents have issued similar orders in the name of national defense. For example, during the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln suspended habeas corpus and the rights to an impartial trial as protected by the Sixth Amendment.

President Lincoln visits the troops

During World War I, President Woodrow Wilson, frustrated with Congress’s reluctance to grant him power over natural resources, invoked an executive order to assume absolute and unilateral authority over the same range of resources.

So, yes, it sounds pretty alarming.

But the White House says it’s just clarifying the status quo – so Americans can be ready in case of emergency.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(2)
post a comment
Theresa Fleming

posted March 19, 2012 at 8:33 pm


The Executive Order is to vague and gives to much power to a presidency which has already abused its’ power repeatedly-for example the war in Libya which many feel was in direct conflict with the War Powers Act. That said, parents do not want the draft in the hands of any president, regardless as to who that President is and whether it is a military or civilian draft. A draft of any kind should require a vote of Congress. And according to the U.S. Constitution – it does!



report abuse
 

bluebuss

posted March 20, 2012 at 1:12 pm


wow stoke fear much. my fear is that all the lies the republican candidates are saying will actually be believed by Americans. how about thou shalt not lie. ring a bell?



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

Hispanics turning evangelical, Jews secular
Worship service attendance is up in New York City, but down among young adult Jews, according to recent studies. On the other hand, fewer Spanish-speaking teens are attending Catholic mass, but more are showing up at Evangelical churches. [caption id="attachment_12343" align="alignleft" width="48

posted 3:10:30pm Nov. 05, 2013 | read full post »

Billy Graham: I know where I'm going
“Daddy thinks the Lord will allow him to live to 95,” said Franklin Graham recently. It was not a prophecy but a hope, Franklin explained, that he would live to see the beginning of a Christian re

posted 10:02:01am Oct. 24, 2013 | read full post »

Are All These Christians' Complaints of Persecution Just So Much Empty Whining?
The headlines are alarming: “Catholic-Owned Company Wins Religious Freedom Court Decision,” “Death Toll Rises to 65 in Boko Haram Attack on Students,” “Little Sisters Catholic Charity Victimized By Obamacare,” “Christians Sought Out, Murdered in the Kenyan Mall Massacre,” “Judicial

posted 2:41:26am Oct. 07, 2013 | read full post »

How can Christians defend themselves against today's random violence?
So, a crazed gunman opens fire and you’re caught in the middle. How can you survive? Heroes come in all sorts of packages. And they wield all sorts of defensive weapons. Such as guns and Jesus. Sometimes both at the same time. [caption id="attachment_12246" align="alignleft" width="480"] Ant

posted 2:53:48pm Sep. 27, 2013 | read full post »

Does Sunday Morning Church Really Need All This Glitter, Showmanship and Gimmickry?
What’s wrong with church today? Are we in danger of turning worship into a flashy concert? Of watering down the message so nobody is offended? Of forgetting the simplicity of the Gospel? I grew up with a preacher’s kid. He was a fake following in the footsteps of his flimflamming father who d

posted 11:26:20am Sep. 20, 2013 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.