Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News


President says he will veto bill that bans ObamaCare abortion funding

President Barack Obama says he will veto the Protect Life Act if it reaches his desk.

The measure would amend ObamaCare to reflect the 45-year-old Hyde Amendment which prohibits taxpayer dollars being spent on any health plan that includes elective abortions.

The Protect Life Act, scheduled to be debated in the House of Representatives Thursday, “retains Hyde’s exception for abortions performed due to the child’s conception in rape or incest or to save the mother’s life.

The Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision barring the use of federal funds to pay for abortions. It is not a permanent law, rather a “rider” that has been routinely attached to annual appropriation legislation since 1976. It primarily affects Medicaid. It is named for its chief sponsor, late Congressman Henry Hyde (R-Ill.).

The Protect Life Act confirms that the Hyde Amendment applies to ObamaCare and “also makes clear that no health insurance carrier may be forced to provide coverage of abortion in any of its health plans,” reports Kathleen Gilbert at LifeSiteNews. It also ”strengthens the conscience rights of health care workers and institutions to reject abortion training, procedures, or referrals.”

Obama fought last year to keep Hyde Amendment language out of the health care bill and says he “strongly opposes” the Act because it “intrudes on women’s reproductive freedom and access to health care.” claiming the health care bill already preserves federal policy against tax funding for abortion.

“Pro-life leaders, including the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, contend that the bill is critical for preserving the status quo on abortion and conscience rights in the face of a health reform that promises to drastically alter the landscape of the abortion battle in America,” wrote Gilbert. ObamaCare ”has already led to a major expansion of the abortion industry: health officials announced this summer that virtually every private insurer, including sectarian institutions, would soon be forced to offer free contraception, abortifacient birth control, and sterilization in its health plans as part of an essential ‘preventive care’ package.”



Advertisement
Comments read comments(6)
post a comment
Bill Fortenberry

posted October 13, 2011 at 10:04 pm


“The inalienable right to life possessed by every human being is present from the moment of initial formation, and all human beings shall be entitled to the equal protection of persons under the law.”



report abuse
 

Desert lady

posted October 14, 2011 at 3:26 pm


And these conscience rights allow a religious based hospital to REFUSE to treat a woman whose life is endangered by a pregnancy! So, the woman’s life is worth nothing? And this is a real situation – my sister had an ectopic pregnancy. The fetus had to be removed to save her life!

This Act just shows that that money is more important than life. It’s horrifying to know that I, as a person, am not worth anything.



report abuse
 

annas

posted October 18, 2011 at 8:19 am


Desert Lady read the law again it says an abortion can be granted if the women’s life is endangered. If the hospital refused its service I’m sure that is not the only hospital in the state.



report abuse
 

Debbie Patterson

posted October 20, 2011 at 12:05 am


I do not understand why a man wants to fight so hard for something he has never experienced. But with next year being a year to vote,i guess he has to have a hidden agenda as well. But the blood of these babies will be on his hands, and then he too can dance with his virgins



report abuse
 

fred-53-99

posted November 1, 2011 at 8:43 am


” And he too can dance with his virgins” What the heck does that mean? Unless you think he is a muslum. Oh well i got a bridge to be sold too.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted November 18, 2011 at 8:21 pm


The President knows that it is not his place or that of government to tell a woman what to do with her body!! The decision to carry a pregnancy is between a woman and her doctor (and a husband/boyfriend if applicable) but ultimately the woman’s decision.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

Hispanics turning evangelical, Jews secular
Worship service attendance is up in New York City, but down among young adult Jews, according to recent studies. On the other hand, fewer Spanish-speaking teens are attending Catholic mass, but more are showing up at Evangelical churches. [caption id="attachment_12343" align="alignleft" width="48

posted 3:10:30pm Nov. 05, 2013 | read full post »

Billy Graham: I know where I'm going
“Daddy thinks the Lord will allow him to live to 95,” said Franklin Graham recently. It was not a prophecy but a hope, Franklin explained, that he would live to see the beginning of a Christian re

posted 10:02:01am Oct. 24, 2013 | read full post »

Are All These Christians' Complaints of Persecution Just So Much Empty Whining?
The headlines are alarming: “Catholic-Owned Company Wins Religious Freedom Court Decision,” “Death Toll Rises to 65 in Boko Haram Attack on Students,” “Little Sisters Catholic Charity Victimized By Obamacare,” “Christians Sought Out, Murdered in the Kenyan Mall Massacre,” “Judicial

posted 2:41:26am Oct. 07, 2013 | read full post »

How can Christians defend themselves against today's random violence?
So, a crazed gunman opens fire and you’re caught in the middle. How can you survive? Heroes come in all sorts of packages. And they wield all sorts of defensive weapons. Such as guns and Jesus. Sometimes both at the same time. [caption id="attachment_12246" align="alignleft" width="480"] Ant

posted 2:53:48pm Sep. 27, 2013 | read full post »

Does Sunday Morning Church Really Need All This Glitter, Showmanship and Gimmickry?
What’s wrong with church today? Are we in danger of turning worship into a flashy concert? Of watering down the message so nobody is offended? Of forgetting the simplicity of the Gospel? I grew up with a preacher’s kid. He was a fake following in the footsteps of his flimflamming father who d

posted 11:26:20am Sep. 20, 2013 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.