Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News


Hundreds of British babies aborted accidentally, according to medical study

posted by

Would this guy have survived British medical policy?

Hundreds of pregnant mothers in Britain have been given faulty information that prompted them to approve post-miscarriage procedures, in effect aborting healthy babies.

“Around a third of the 500,000 miscarriages a year in the UK are confirmed via ultrasound scans of the fetus and the sac that envelops it in the womb,” reports Fiona MacRae for the British newspaper the Daily Mail. “The scans from very early pregnancies are particularly hard to read and a second scan will often be carried out to ensure accuracy if a miscarriage is suspected.”

However, approval for a second scan often is denied under British national health care. MacRae cited the case of Naila Zubair. She was told she had miscarried and was given drugs to flush out her womb. However, the next day, she was told her baby was still alive. Now, she fears the child may be severely handicapped from the inadvertent abortion attempt.

“Hundreds of mothers-to-be a year are being wrongly told they have lost their baby because of mistakes in reading ultrasound scans, doctors fear,” writes MacRae. “Some of the 400 women given a wrong diagnosis each year will choose to wait to see if they go on to miscarry naturally, but others will take the option of terminating the pregnancy.”

“For most women, sadly there is nothing we can do to prevent a miscarriage,” writes Professor Tom Bourne of the Imperial College of London. “But we do need to make sure we don’t make things worse by intervening unnecessarily in ongoing pregnancies. We hope our work means that the guidelines to determine miscarriage are made as watertight as we would expect for determining death at any other stage of life.”

For instance, he told the Telegraph, if the fetus is very small and a heartbeat can’t be detected, the woman has a second scan seven to ten days later. The same applies if the gestational sac that should contain the fetus is relatively small and appears to be empty. But if the fetus or sac is not unusually small, just one scan is done before the woman is told she has lost her baby.

She then has the option of waiting to miscarry naturally, taking pills to induce the miscarriage or surgical removal, reported MacRae:

But experts say the 2-centimeter cut-off point between having one scan and two is too risky. A study of more than 1,000 British women estimated that around one in 200 who are deemed to have miscarried because they have an apparently empty gestational sac of over 2cm will actually still be pregnant.

These women would benefit from waiting for a second scan a week or so later that would be expected to reveal the fetus was alive.

A further study revealed this figure could be much higher, as the measurements taken from the scans vary by as much as 20 per cent between medical staff.

The researchers said the precise numbers are unclear, but writing in the journal Ultrasound In Obstetrics And Gynecology, they estimated that errors could lead to 400 women with healthy pregnancies being wrongly told their baby has died each year.

The research team, from four London hospitals and the Catholic University of Leuven in Belgium, said: ‘These numbers are significant and relate to pregnancies that would be highly likely to reach term.’

Professor Bourne, who led much of the research, called for an immediate interim change in the guidelines, pending further large-scale research.

In the meantime, he recommends those who are anxious to consider requesting the option of returning in a week to have a second scan.

Dr Mark Hamilton, a consultant gynaecologist at Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, said the research reinforced the need for staff to take the greatest care when determining miscarriage, and urged that medical or surgical procedures should be postponed until the outcome of the pregnancy was a ‘certainty’.

The Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists said a review of its guidelines was already under way and it will take the new findings into account.



  • http://michaelallenonline.com/whenyoumissme Michael Allen

    When I read the headline at first, I thought this can’t be possible. I mean, how do you accidentally have an abortion? But, this is awful and I feel for Naila. I hope the baby grows to be healthy and live a normal life. God caught that one!

  • http://AccidentallyisWORSEthanONPURPOSE? Pearl

    YOU are letting your liberal bias shine through again. You should be incensed that 4000 babies are aborted DAILY. You won’t touch that though because you are of the liberal mindset. YOU will vilify soda pop and smoking while condoning the idea of legalizing drugs and abortions as ‘women’s choice’. Who speaks up for the babies, is this your idea of standing up for babies? Laughably sad, sad, sad.

  • http://AddaURLtothiscomment Laurel

    Miscarriage is a natural event. It needs no help from us. If doctors would stop interfering with the natural course of pregnancies, we might actually see more healthy babies. I hope that the British medical community takes responsibility for this – it’s negligent to, in essence, guess if a fetus is healthy or not.

  • http://AddaURLtothiscomment Laurel

    This is absolutely outrageous. My heart breaks for all of those mothers who put their trust in these medical “professionals.” When are doctors going to learn NOT to interfere with pregnancy unless needed? Mother nature doesn’t need your help! Miscarriage is a natural event. The body takes care of it with time. If these mothers were indeed experiencing a natural miscarriage, they would have known it. I hope those who failed these mothers and babies are held responsible. This is manipulative negligence at its worst.

  • http://AddaURLtothiscomment Sharln

    I was told that my 3rd child had died since my ultrasound showed a very small baby and no heartbeat. The doctor wanted to schedule me for immediate surgical removal of the baby.

    I demanded further proof. I was given a blood test and then another 2 weeks later. The blood work showed I was still having a viable pregnancy since hormones were rising.

    I gave birth to an extremely healthy baby girl..my due dates were just guessed wrongly.

  • http://AddaURLtothiscomment pagansister

    There really is no excuse for this situation! Certainly with these findings a mother to be in Britain might question the person (doctor) who tells her this and asks for a 2nd opinion and then wait for more testing before agreeing to a procedure. And as someone mentioned above—a natural miscarriage is hard to miss!

  • http://AddaURLtothiscomment Jennie

    and here’s another reason that abortion should never be OK.

  • http://www.easterndrugs.com Maria Carillet

    If doctors would stop interfering with the natural course of pregnancies, we might actually see more healthy babies. but some women given a wrong diagnosis each year will choose to wait to see if they go on to miscarry naturally, but others will take the option of terminating the pregnancy.

Previous Posts

Hispanics turning evangelical, Jews secular
Worship service attendance is up in New York City, but down among young adult Jews, according to recent studies. On the other hand, fewer Spanish-speaking teens are attending Catholic mass, but more are showing up at Evangelical churches. [caption id="attachment_12343" align="alignleft" width="48

posted 3:10:30pm Nov. 05, 2013 | read full post »

Billy Graham: I know where I'm going
“Daddy thinks the Lord will allow him to live to 95,” said Franklin Graham recently. It was not a prophecy but a hope, Franklin explained, that he would live to see the beginning of a Christian re

posted 10:02:01am Oct. 24, 2013 | read full post »

Are All These Christians' Complaints of Persecution Just So Much Empty Whining?
The headlines are alarming: “Catholic-Owned Company Wins Religious Freedom Court Decision,” “Death Toll Rises to 65 in Boko Haram Attack on Students,” “Little Sisters Catholic Charity Victimized By Obamacare,” “Christians Sought Out, Murdered in the Kenyan Mall Massacre,” “Judicial

posted 2:41:26am Oct. 07, 2013 | read full post »

How can Christians defend themselves against today's random violence?
So, a crazed gunman opens fire and you’re caught in the middle. How can you survive? Heroes come in all sorts of packages. And they wield all sorts of defensive weapons. Such as guns and Jesus. Sometimes both at the same time. [caption id="attachment_12246" align="alignleft" width="480"] Ant

posted 2:53:48pm Sep. 27, 2013 | read full post »

Does Sunday Morning Church Really Need All This Glitter, Showmanship and Gimmickry?
What’s wrong with church today? Are we in danger of turning worship into a flashy concert? Of watering down the message so nobody is offended? Of forgetting the simplicity of the Gospel? I grew up with a preacher’s kid. He was a fake following in the footsteps of his flimflamming father who d

posted 11:26:20am Sep. 20, 2013 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.