Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News


San Francisco’s attorney questions proposed circumcision ban

By LAUREN MARKOE ~ c. 2011 Religion News Service

In a potential blow to the proposed San Francisco circumcision ban, the city’s top lawyer has concluded it is unconstitutional to ban the practice as a religious ritual, but allow it as a medical procedure.

The measure, now headed toward the Nov. 8 ballot, would ban nearly all infant circumcisions.

A lawsuit arguing that no California city can regulate a medical procedure that is allowed by the state will be heard on July 15. The plaintiffs are a group of Jews and Muslims, groups that practice ritual circumcision.

Should they win, a narrower ban exempting medical circumcision could apply only to circumcision as a religious practice. And that would defy the First Amendment, according to a brief recently filed by the city attorney.

“San Franciscans cannot be asked to vote on whether to prohibit religious minorities from engaging in a particular religious practice, when the same practice may be performed under nonreligious auspices,” wrote Chief Deputy City Attorney Therese Stewart.

The proposed ban, sponsored by groups who are opposed to what they consider the genital mutilation of boys, has angered Jews, Muslims and others who consider circumcision to be a parent’s choice.

“The city’s response was completely political,” said Georganne Chapin, executive director of Intact America, an anti-circumcision group that did not sponsor the proposed ban, but supports its intent.

“It is not aimed at Jewish circumcision,” Chapin said. “It’s aimed at the involuntary circumcision of all minors, irrespective of religion.”



Advertisement
Comments read comments(8)
post a comment
lee weinstein

posted July 5, 2011 at 7:35 pm


The federal government has made it illegal to perform any medically unnecessary surgery to the genitals of female minors. If that is constitutional, how is this proposed law to give equal protection to male minors, unconstitutional?



report abuse
 

Bill

posted July 5, 2011 at 10:20 pm


Precisely, if females are protected, protection must be extended to males, too. Human arrogance does not cease to insist that Nature [or God] did not do certain things right. It is only a matter of time when Nature will strike back decisively.



report abuse
 

Hugh7

posted July 6, 2011 at 7:46 pm


This is just another example of the hydra-headed nature of circumcision enabling it to fight its way out of any net. What other religious rite is a medical procedure? What other religious rite OR medical procedure involves cutting normal, healthy, non-regrowing, functional tissue from a non-consenting person? (And before anyone says “abortion”, “person” is the whole point at issue in that debate – there is no dispute that a newborn baby is a person.)



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted July 6, 2011 at 8:21 pm


speaking as a person who celebrates having a perfect penis I’m sure glad these idiots weren’t around to prevent doctors from circumcising me as a baby, it,s cleaner, safer and of course there is that look of perfection I’d hate to have to have it done as an adult.



report abuse
 

Hugh7

posted July 6, 2011 at 11:49 pm


@cknuck: Do you imagine for a moment that you’d think your penis wasn’t “perfect” if you’d grown up with all of it? Most men like what they’ve got. The difference is that those who don’t like having had part removed have a legitimate grievance, while those who think they’ve got too much (a very small proportion) have the answer in their hands – well, in their wallets.

Cleaner? – cleaning it is easy and (don’t tell anyone!) fun. Safer? – not enough to rely on, if at all. But in any cases those are issues for him to decide, nobody else.



report abuse
 

    Rob Kerby, Senior Editor

    posted July 7, 2011 at 7:55 am


    Uh, guys, I hate to interupt the locker room talk, but let’s remember this is a family-friendly, inspirational website. I’m not sure discussing one’s genitalia is, ummmmm, well, you know …



    report abuse
     

Pingback: Maybe San Francisco will wake jews up – The Jewish Journal of Greater L.A. » The Legends of the Jews

cknuck

posted July 8, 2011 at 12:58 am


:-D sorry



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

Hispanics turning evangelical, Jews secular
Worship service attendance is up in New York City, but down among young adult Jews, according to recent studies. On the other hand, fewer Spanish-speaking teens are attending Catholic mass, but more are showing up at Evangelical churches. [caption id="attachment_12343" align="alignleft" width="48

posted 3:10:30pm Nov. 05, 2013 | read full post »

Billy Graham: I know where I'm going
“Daddy thinks the Lord will allow him to live to 95,” said Franklin Graham recently. It was not a prophecy but a hope, Franklin explained, that he would live to see the beginning of a Christian re

posted 10:02:01am Oct. 24, 2013 | read full post »

Are All These Christians' Complaints of Persecution Just So Much Empty Whining?
The headlines are alarming: “Catholic-Owned Company Wins Religious Freedom Court Decision,” “Death Toll Rises to 65 in Boko Haram Attack on Students,” “Little Sisters Catholic Charity Victimized By Obamacare,” “Christians Sought Out, Murdered in the Kenyan Mall Massacre,” “Judicial

posted 2:41:26am Oct. 07, 2013 | read full post »

How can Christians defend themselves against today's random violence?
So, a crazed gunman opens fire and you’re caught in the middle. How can you survive? Heroes come in all sorts of packages. And they wield all sorts of defensive weapons. Such as guns and Jesus. Sometimes both at the same time. [caption id="attachment_12246" align="alignleft" width="480"] Ant

posted 2:53:48pm Sep. 27, 2013 | read full post »

Does Sunday Morning Church Really Need All This Glitter, Showmanship and Gimmickry?
What’s wrong with church today? Are we in danger of turning worship into a flashy concert? Of watering down the message so nobody is offended? Of forgetting the simplicity of the Gospel? I grew up with a preacher’s kid. He was a fake following in the footsteps of his flimflamming father who d

posted 11:26:20am Sep. 20, 2013 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.