Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News


Feds rule against a second Catholic college

By G. JEFFREY MacDONALD
c. 2011 Religion News Service

(RNS) For the second time this year, a federal regulator has rejected the First Amendment arguments of a Catholic college and cleared the way for the school’s adjunct faculty to unionize.

In a May 26 decision, the Chicago office of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled that Saint Xavier University has no right to a religious exemption from board oversight because “it operates strictly as a secular educational institution.”

The NRLB’s argument is that since the Chicago school doesn’t require faculty or students to profess Catholic beliefs, the NLRB’s involvement in adjunct employment practices wouldn’t interfere with Saint Xavier’s religious freedom.

Earlier this year, another regional NLRB regulator issued a similar decision in a case involving Catholic-run Manhattan College in Riverdale, N.Y. An appeal in that case is currently pending before the NLRB in Washington.

Saint Xavier University President Christine M. Wiseman said the two schools stand together in claiming a violation of First Amendment rights.

“The NLRB’s attempt to exercise jurisdiction constitutes an undue burden or intrusion on our free exercise of religion,” Wiseman said in a statement. “The issue is whether the Catholic Church and the bishops get to determine our Catholic identity — or whether the NLRB gets to determine our Catholic identity. This is an issue that could impact all religious institutions, and many of us are concerned.”

At stake is not just principle but also millions of dollars per year. Religious colleges, like others in higher education, increasingly hold down payroll costs by hiring nonunion adjunct faculty to teach one or more courses on a part-time, contract basis. If schools are compelled to let adjuncts unionize, education costs could climb even higher.

Those with the most to lose might be liberal religious colleges that don’t require professions of faith or have otherwise strayed from their sectarian roots, according to Kevin Theriot, a lawyer with the Alliance Defense Fund, which specializes in religious liberty cases.

In both regional NLRB rulings, regulators argued that if a college doesn’t expect instructors to embrace tenets of faith, then NLRB oversight will neither be burdensome nor change the status quo on campus.

Advocates for Catholic higher education see the Saint Xavier case as the latest skirmish in a decades-long fight with an NLRB that refuses to cede jurisdiction.

“The NLRB is clearly infringing on the rights of colleges to apply religious criteria without federal government interference,” said a statement from Patrick J. Reilly, president of the Cardinal Newman Society and author of a new 22-page paper chronicling the tense history between Catholic colleges and the NLRB.

“The NLRB assault on Catholic colleges … stands in clear contradiction to federal court rulings, which have instructed the NLRB to stop interfering with Catholic education.”



Advertisement
Comments read comments(6)
post a comment
nnmns

posted June 8, 2011 at 8:45 pm


They want the right to squeeze all they can out of their adjunct faculty. I’m glad the law is being carried out.



report abuse
 

Pingback: ADF Alliance Alert » Feds rule against a second Catholic college

pagansister

posted June 9, 2011 at 8:54 pm


No tears over the decision. Good for the government.



report abuse
 

Sondra

posted June 9, 2011 at 11:05 pm


…so a religious institution no longer has the right to self-determination? How can readers feel teachers at a Catholic College must be unionized, when that particular union supports and promotes ideas and political candidates that are in express opposition to Catholic teaching? It’s a clear First Amendment issue: the government must not muzzle free expression of religion, and that includes an educational environment that is faithful to the teachings of the Catholic Church.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted June 11, 2011 at 8:16 pm


The Catholic church should not be surprised they have a bible. Now they know why Daniel would not eat the king’s food.



report abuse
 

InterestingCase

posted June 13, 2011 at 8:34 pm


Interested to see where this will end up – how does one define “religious”?!?!? if an institution of higher learning is religious in “name only” the government seems to be on the right track in this particular case. Of course no house of worship or religious institution wants government interference, but while it seems clear that a “house of worship” is set up for the religious purposes, things get a little more murky with religious institutions. If the religious institution is no different than any other institution, then the bar seems to be set way too low – ANY institution could name itself as religious yet have no religious requirements of their employees/students/etc. It makes sense that a religious “institution” must require attendance at religious services, a signed covenant of beliefs and/or required Bible Study/study of sacred texts.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

Hispanics turning evangelical, Jews secular
Worship service attendance is up in New York City, but down among young adult Jews, according to recent studies. On the other hand, fewer Spanish-speaking teens are attending Catholic mass, but more are showing up at Evangelical churches. [caption id="attachment_12343" align="alignleft" width="48

posted 3:10:30pm Nov. 05, 2013 | read full post »

Billy Graham: I know where I'm going
“Daddy thinks the Lord will allow him to live to 95,” said Franklin Graham recently. It was not a prophecy but a hope, Franklin explained, that he would live to see the beginning of a Christian re

posted 10:02:01am Oct. 24, 2013 | read full post »

Are All These Christians' Complaints of Persecution Just So Much Empty Whining?
The headlines are alarming: “Catholic-Owned Company Wins Religious Freedom Court Decision,” “Death Toll Rises to 65 in Boko Haram Attack on Students,” “Little Sisters Catholic Charity Victimized By Obamacare,” “Christians Sought Out, Murdered in the Kenyan Mall Massacre,” “Judicial

posted 2:41:26am Oct. 07, 2013 | read full post »

How can Christians defend themselves against today's random violence?
So, a crazed gunman opens fire and you’re caught in the middle. How can you survive? Heroes come in all sorts of packages. And they wield all sorts of defensive weapons. Such as guns and Jesus. Sometimes both at the same time. [caption id="attachment_12246" align="alignleft" width="480"] Ant

posted 2:53:48pm Sep. 27, 2013 | read full post »

Does Sunday Morning Church Really Need All This Glitter, Showmanship and Gimmickry?
What’s wrong with church today? Are we in danger of turning worship into a flashy concert? Of watering down the message so nobody is offended? Of forgetting the simplicity of the Gospel? I grew up with a preacher’s kid. He was a fake following in the footsteps of his flimflamming father who d

posted 11:26:20am Sep. 20, 2013 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.