Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News


Abortion Strains Religious-Government Aid Coalition

posted by mconsoli

WASHINGTON (RNS) It took Dr. Hanna Klaus four years and $1.6 million in federal funding, but she and her team have preached abstinence to more than 23,000 African teenagers.
It’s the only way to curb the AIDS epidemic that’s sweeping that continent, said Klaus, executive director of Teen Star, based just outside Washington in Bethesda, Md.
“I don’t know why people think they have to have a medical response to a behavioral problem,” said Klaus, a gynecologist and a Roman Catholic nun. “Behavioral problems should be treated behaviorally. The easiest thing in the world is to wait (to have sex) until you get married, and marry a virgin.”
Klaus and other abstinence advocates say their approach, favored by conservative policy makers, has fallen out of favor with the Obama administration. Now, Klaus said, her organization isn’t eligible for the same grants she once received because she doesn’t promote condom use, and because she’ll never promote abortion.
Foreign aid officials say federal programs abroad continue to emphasize abstinence and fidelity along with contraception, but conservatives worry that the Obama administration is leaning toward abortion-friendly policies.
If the two sides can’t find common ground, analysts say, poor Africans who benefit from the U.S. government’s multi-billion-dollar AIDS relief strategy could lose out.
“The foreign development coalition is very fragile, and this is a debate that could break it beyond repair,” said Michael Gerson, a former speechwriter for President George W. Bush and advocate of AIDS relief in Africa, at a recent foreign aid conference held at the evangelical Wheaton College outside Chicago.
Bush’s five-year, $18 billion President’s Plan for Emergency AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), introduced in 2003, provided HIV testing for 33 million people and anti-retroviral drugs to nearly 1.5 million Africans. The program saved an estimated 3.2 million years of adult life, according to federal documents.
The program earned a $48 billion, five-year extension in 2008, but not without a fight. A handful of conservative lawmakers complained the reauthorization was too expensive, and also worried that the money would be used to promote abortion.
The re-authorization was approved, but now conservatives worry that the consensus that emerged in 2003 and again in 2008 — a combination of abstinence education and condom distribution — is edging toward promoting abortion.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told Canadian reporters this spring that maternal health goes hand-in-hand with “reproductive health.”
“And reproductive health includes contraception and family planning and access to legal, safe abortion,” Clinton said March 30 during a news conference with G8 foreign ministers.
Clinton’s “abortion grenade,” as Gerson called it, threatens to upend support for the program from both Republicans and religious groups committed to overseas development but abhor abortion.
“It’s a shame that the current administration and the majority party seem intent on using every opportunity they get to promote abortion,”
said Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., who was among those who opposed PEPFAR’s reauthorization.
Burr said he’ll oppose any legislation that includes an abortion provision, even within “life-saving programs such as PEPFAR.”
Heated words and threats of pulled support are nothing new, said D.
Michael Lindsay, a Rice University professor and author of “Faith in the Halls of Power.”
“What we’re seeing is political posturing that’s been going on for
25 years,” ever since President Reagan decided that federal foreign aid would not be used to promote abortion, Lindsay said.
Reagan’s announcement, known as the Mexico City Policy, became a political ping pong ball when President Clinton rescinded it in 1993, and when Bush re-instated it in 2001, and Obama removed it once again in 2009.
“It’s become a symbolic move made by Republicans or Democrats as a way of signaling their allegiance in terms of their respective bases of support,” Lindsay said.
It would take a lot more than a change in PEPFAR or another foreign health policy to realize conservative’s worst fears. The 1973 Helms Amendment bars federal dollars sent overseas from being used to perform, pay for or promote abortion.
Conservatives are engaging in “phantom arguments,” said Susan Cohen of the Guttmacher Institute, an abortion rights group. Too many anti-abortion activists think “abortion” when they hear the phrase “family planning,” she said.
“Family planning is not abortion, and abortion is not a part of the U.S. Global Health Initiative,” Cohen said. “Family planning is essential, and it makes a difference in saving people’s lives, both in preventing HIV and making sure women are pregnant at intervals that are safe for them and safe for their newborns.”
If family planning isn’t a part of AIDS relief and other health programs, she said, poor Africans will lose their lives.
But Clinton’s remarks, along with what they view as an increasingly pro-abortion administration, have so rattled conservatives that they’re prepared to pull their support for global health programs, even if it means people will die from a lack of anti-retroviral drugs, condoms and other tools that have already saved countless lives.
“Things are on very shaky ground,” said Tom McClusky of the Washington-based Family Research Council, a conservative advocacy group.
For many Americans, McClusky said, abortion is a deal-breaker, and Congress listens to their opinions.
“We’ve been pushing back on AIDS cases in Africa,” he said. “But now, we’ll probably see an increase in cases. Worst-case scenario? You’ll see AIDS once again being the tyranny of Africa.”
Copyright 2010 Religion News Service. All rights reserved. No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(13)
post a comment
nnmns

posted June 16, 2010 at 8:57 pm


I understand PEPFAR has, in the past, not covered real contraception so including, e.g. condoms, is a big advance. If conservatives choose to assume contraception means abortion and pull their support the deaths are on them.
And, around the world, one way and another, a lot of deaths are on them.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted June 16, 2010 at 9:54 pm


It seems to me the headline for this column clearly should be “Irrational Fear of Abortion Strains Religious-Government Aid Coalition”.



report abuse
 

cmaglaughlin

posted June 17, 2010 at 8:26 am


“Hell”-ary Clinton wants abortions SAFE!!!! Reward bad behavior and slaughter the innocent! Yeah, that’ll go over well on Judgment Day!



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted June 17, 2010 at 12:42 pm


cmag stop worrying about “Judgment Day”. It’s not going to happen. Try living so the world is a better place instead of so it’s a nastier place.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted June 17, 2010 at 1:35 pm


Give out birth control while teaching that in order to prevent STDS and unwanted pregnancies, abstain from sex until marriage or a committed relationship. How hard is that? Condoms and other forms of birth control should be given out in order to prevent a possible need for an abortion. The availability of an abortion should not be disposed of, as there are situations where it may be necessary.
cmag: AH, Judgement Day threats yet again, rearing it’s uglay head. That “day” has been predicted for so darn long that it is truly OLD NEWS. How many have been missed so far? To many to count. However, just to make you happy, I hope you live long enough to be yanked to where ever you think you’ll be yanked to. Then the rest of us can go on with our lives…Have a heavenly day. Personally, I’m with nnmns….living in this world is so much better than hoping for something “better”. Guess what…THIS IS IT!



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted June 17, 2010 at 8:17 pm


“Clinton’s “abortion grenade,”
Accurate description abortion only inspires and encourages bad behavior in the combination of adultery, fornication and murder, nice Hilary.



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted June 17, 2010 at 9:33 pm


Too bad that sometimes it’s necessary and really needs to be legal and available. But if we teach abstinence and real contraception for a change abortions can be few.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted June 18, 2010 at 1:26 am


did you say abstinence? I can’t believe it but I’m pleasantly surprised



report abuse
 

cmaglaughlin

posted June 18, 2010 at 7:31 am


@nnmns…”Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Have a banana, bonzo.”



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted June 18, 2010 at 9:14 pm


yes, cknuck (and cmag), abstinence is a viable option…however the other options to prevent unwanted pregnancies are viable too. Why do you find it strange that nnmns would mention that?
As I said above, the more birth control options the less need for abortions. Simple. With that said, abortion should not be eliminated for those cases that that is the only option.(and as much as you both don’t approve, it is a fact that sometimes it is necessary). Not being women (I assume cmag that your aren’t, but if you are…whatever) you can’t possibly think like one.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted June 19, 2010 at 3:25 pm


pagan you are right, but perhaps a bit little myopic, maybe because you only view the situation from the woman’s point of view, a woman who has made a mistake in judgment. What about the man/father’s point of view? What about the unborn baby’s point of view? What about God’s point of view? You may be of the school that sex is just sex, the point of view that has be like decay to our sociality. The irresponsibly of the casual sex movement has not played well any of our generations but many people are too blind to see it.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted June 19, 2010 at 7:12 pm


cknuck…perhaps a little myopic…as I am a woman and logically think that way. As to the sperm donor…there are many who run rapidly in the other direction when they find out a pregancy has occured….obviously not all. As the “unborn baby’s point of view.” Let me say this first…IMO, an abortion should be carried out before the end of the 3rd month…Having said that…there would no point of view from the “baby”. If a woman can’t make up her mind before that time, then she should complete the pregnancy. I’m not for later terminations…though they happen, for various reasons. Whole different topic.
No, I’m not of the school that sex is just sex. Hopefully those engaged in it have some feeling for the person they are with. But facts show that there is casual sex….and since that is a fact, preventive methods are important.
This article mentions Africa….and the need to help prevent STD’s and unwanted pregnancies. I’m for less abortions, more prevention and certainly less STDS. No one is going to succeed in preventing sex…even telling everyone the truth about abstinence being the best prevention of all the above.



report abuse
 

q7

posted June 23, 2010 at 8:12 am

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

Hispanics turning evangelical, Jews secular
Worship service attendance is up in New York City, but down among young adult Jews, according to recent studies. On the other hand, fewer Spanish-speaking teens are attending Catholic mass, but more are showing up at Evangelical churches. [caption id="attachment_12343" align="alignleft" width="48

posted 3:10:30pm Nov. 05, 2013 | read full post »

Billy Graham: I know where I'm going
“Daddy thinks the Lord will allow him to live to 95,” said Franklin Graham recently. It was not a prophecy but a hope, Franklin explained, that he would live to see the beginning of a Christian re

posted 10:02:01am Oct. 24, 2013 | read full post »

Are All These Christians' Complaints of Persecution Just So Much Empty Whining?
The headlines are alarming: “Catholic-Owned Company Wins Religious Freedom Court Decision,” “Death Toll Rises to 65 in Boko Haram Attack on Students,” “Little Sisters Catholic Charity Victimized By Obamacare,” “Christians Sought Out, Murdered in the Kenyan Mall Massacre,” “Judicial

posted 2:41:26am Oct. 07, 2013 | read full post »

How can Christians defend themselves against today's random violence?
So, a crazed gunman opens fire and you’re caught in the middle. How can you survive? Heroes come in all sorts of packages. And they wield all sorts of defensive weapons. Such as guns and Jesus. Sometimes both at the same time. [caption id="attachment_12246" align="alignleft" width="480"] Ant

posted 2:53:48pm Sep. 27, 2013 | read full post »

Does Sunday Morning Church Really Need All This Glitter, Showmanship and Gimmickry?
What’s wrong with church today? Are we in danger of turning worship into a flashy concert? Of watering down the message so nobody is offended? Of forgetting the simplicity of the Gospel? I grew up with a preacher’s kid. He was a fake following in the footsteps of his flimflamming father who d

posted 11:26:20am Sep. 20, 2013 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.