Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News


Does Obama’s Agenda Include Religious Freedom?

posted by mconsoli

(RNS) When the Dalai Lama came to Washington two years ago, he was feted with the nation’s highest civilian honor, the Congressional Gold Medal, as President George W. Bush and a bipartisan delegation looked on.
But as the exiled Tibetan leader returns for another visit to the nation’s capital next week (Oct. 5-10), there is a White House-sized hole in his itinerary.
President Obama will not meet with the Dalai Lama, breaking a precedent that dates to President George H.W. Bush in 1991. Obama will not convene with the famed Buddhist monk until after the president returns from a summit in Beijing in November, the administration has said.
The perceived snub has angered human rights advocates, who say it reflects an early pattern in Obama’s foreign policy to sideline religious freedom in favor of other issues like trade and climate change.
“Not only does (Obama) risk saying that, he comes very close to saying it outright,” said Thomas Farr, who was director of the State Department’s Office of International Religious Freedom from 1999-2003.
“They do seem to be saying that religious freedom is important — but not as important as these other issues, and I think that is a serious error.”
The Chinese government is severely critical of the Dalai Lama, who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1989, calling him a “splittist” who aims to undermine Beijing’s control of Tibet. They also discourage heads of state from meeting with the Dalai Lama, who says he is seeking more autonomy for Tibetans — not a split from China.
Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., co-chair of Congress’ Human Rights Commission, which held a hearing on China on Tuesday (Sept. 29), called Obama’s decision not to meet with the Dalai Lama “an embarrassment.”
“Whenever you sell a global religious leader out for an export deal, that’s very bad. Economics should not trump human rights. You can do them both together and do them respectfully,” Wolf said in an interview.
Farr, too, said not meeting with the Dalai Lama sends a “very, very bad message” that the U.S. is willing to back down on religious freedom.
Though Obama has drawn praise for talking about the importance of religious rights — most notably in a speech in Cairo last June — critics say his policies do not match his rhetoric.
“It got some lines in the Cairo speech, but we haven’t seen any pressing on the issue so far,” said Michael Cromartie, a member of the U.S. Commission on Religious Freedom, an independent, bipartisan panel created by Congress in 1998. “Snubbing the Dalai Lama is another indication of that.”
In May, the USCIRF issued a stinging rebuke of the Chinese government, saying it “engages in systematic and egregious violations of the freedom of religion or belief.” The report also said that “in Tibetan Buddhist areas, religious freedom conditions may be worse now than at any time since the Commission’s inception.”
The U.S. State Department has also criticized China, labeling it a “country of particular concern” not only for its treatment of Tibetan Buddhists, but also of Muslim Uighurs, Christian house churches, and Falun Gong practitioners.
But Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has seemed to downplay disagreements with China over religious freedom, saying last February such issues “can’t interfere” with efforts to broker deals on climate change, security and trade. Moreover, the White House has begun to engage regimes in Sudan, Myanmar and Cuba that have spotty human rights records; failed to criticize abuses in Iran and Egypt; and left vacant the post of ambassador-at-large for religious freedom.
“If this administration has a considered approach to these issues, we’re all waiting to hear it,” said Sophie Richardson, Asia advocacy director for Human Rights Watch. “Until they make their intentions, tactics, and priorities clear, it’s very hard not to conclude that these guys are not going to do a great deal on the issue of human rights in China.”
The Obama administration refused repeated request for comment about its policies on religious freedom or the Dalai Lama’s visit to Washington.
Senior White House Advisor Valerie Jarrett and a State Department official met last month with the Dalai Lama in Dharamsala, India, the seat of the Tibetan government-in-exile. In a statement after the meeting, the Dalai Lama’s office said Jarrett “reiterated President Obama’s commitment to support the Tibetan people in protecting their distinct religious, linguistic, and cultural heritage and securing respect for their human rights and civil liberties.”
Mary Beth Markey, vice president for advocacy at the International Campaign for Tibet, said the Dalai Lama had a role in the decision not to meet with Obama in Washington. For years, she said, presidents have been meeting with the exiled Buddhist leader, but China hasn’t budged.
In fact, the situation in Tibet has worsened.
“My true sense is that the decision was based on switching things up,” Markey said. “And if the Chinese appreciate the gesture of postponing or not engaging the Dalai Lama before the president goes to China, maybe that’s a better first step.”
Copyright 2009 Religion News Service. All rights reserved. No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(12)
post a comment
Nate W

posted October 1, 2009 at 6:10 pm


Religious freedom and human rights should most definitely interfere with trade. If Western nations would threaten an outright ban on importing all the useless junk the Chinese manufacture, then maybe we’d be able to put a bit more pressure on them to get their act together on more important matters.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted October 1, 2009 at 8:31 pm


amen



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted October 2, 2009 at 1:21 am


This article is a butcher job. They quoted people on only the side that thinks lack of religious freedom is the world’s most pressing problem and it would be ok to start a tussle between the world’s two strongest powers that could make it harder to solve economic problems and, most important, global warming.



report abuse
 

Kauko

posted October 2, 2009 at 11:11 am


So, we’re supposed to turn on blind eye on countries like China that have long records of human rights abuses so that America can make more money off of them?



report abuse
 

nnmns

posted October 2, 2009 at 2:33 pm


I believe that would be American workers. I don’t know that America makes much off China. But at least it doesn’t send it billions in foreign aid every year.
I understand Israel is biased against its non-Jewish citizens yet we deal with them all the time. Interesting that that doesn’t come up.



report abuse
 

jestrfyl

posted October 2, 2009 at 2:37 pm


During the American Revolution there was a popular song called “The World Turned Upside Down”. Seeing Republicans proclaiming the virtues and wonder of the Dali Lama as the Democratic president asks for a delay in meeting definitely fits the bill for “The World Turned Upside Down”. Clearly, transparently, and without qualification, this is political posturing at its most comical. The D.L. and the Hefelumps have so little in common it would be a wonder if they could agree about which meal they are sharing (“Lunch!” Breakfast!” “Lunch!” Breakfast!” ).
Nate
It is good to see you here again. You wrote:
“Religious freedom and human rights should most definitely interfere with trade. If Western nations would threaten an outright ban on importing all the useless junk the Chinese manufacture, then maybe we’d be able to put a bit more pressure on them to get their act together on more important matters.”
But then what would we do for Happy Meals and holiday decorations? They would have to start opening schools for all the kids instead of making them work in factories. It would be a (wait for it) Cultural Revolution!



report abuse
 

Dan

posted October 3, 2009 at 5:51 am


If I were H.H. the Dalai Lama,
and no I don’t mean that two-l Llama,
I would think I would be glad not
to be a two-b Obbama.



report abuse
 

Dan

posted October 3, 2009 at 5:55 am


Make that a one-a-b Obama?



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted October 3, 2009 at 12:05 pm


President Obama knows exactly where he is, and what should be said, and what shouldn’t be said. He is steady, aware, has a purpose, and an intelligence that most of us will never have. Everyone should go about their own business, and leave Him to his.



report abuse
 

cknuck

posted October 11, 2009 at 11:06 pm


H22 you do know what you sound like you are saying?



report abuse
 

cheap ugg boots

posted October 22, 2009 at 4:38 am


Ugg Classic Cardy: http://www.llikeonline.com/ugg-classic-cardy-c-69.html
Cheap ugg boots put you ahead of fashion. And the uggs on sale,buy uggs online is your best choice. We can provide Fashionable design and High quality UGG boots,the fashionable ugg classic cardy is cheap and substantial benefit.
What a surprise is that recently we have a pomotion for all the customers, Everyone just buy two UGG boots.then you can get a pair of UGG slipper for free! Limited stock, hurry up!
Free Shipping, Delivery by EMS in 6-9 business days.



report abuse
 

Peter Bailley

posted October 25, 2009 at 8:51 pm


The Chinese Communist Party is so intractable and determined to crush all religion, (notably the Falun Gong, who are innocent Buddhists), that any direct statements to even mention this are responded to with fury and threats. However, that is the way of this kind of bully,,to lie, bluster, then back down when confronted. The truth of their barbarous behaviour just needs to be said simply and plainly. Obama should meet the Dalai Lhama and let the trade agreements look after themselves,,after all, they need our trade as much as we need theirs. Stand up to the bullies, let them understand that we don’t want them in our world and give them a chance to change. If we deny our responsibilities and compromise our consciences by turning our backs on people who need us, we will pay a far heavier price than a temporary dent in the accounts. History is proof of this,,it has never worked and it never will.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

Hispanics turning evangelical, Jews secular
Worship service attendance is up in New York City, but down among young adult Jews, according to recent studies. On the other hand, fewer Spanish-speaking teens are attending Catholic mass, but more are showing up at Evangelical churches. [caption id="attachment_12343" align="alignleft" width="48

posted 3:10:30pm Nov. 05, 2013 | read full post »

Billy Graham: I know where I'm going
“Daddy thinks the Lord will allow him to live to 95,” said Franklin Graham recently. It was not a prophecy but a hope, Franklin explained, that he would live to see the beginning of a Christian re

posted 10:02:01am Oct. 24, 2013 | read full post »

Are All These Christians' Complaints of Persecution Just So Much Empty Whining?
The headlines are alarming: “Catholic-Owned Company Wins Religious Freedom Court Decision,” “Death Toll Rises to 65 in Boko Haram Attack on Students,” “Little Sisters Catholic Charity Victimized By Obamacare,” “Christians Sought Out, Murdered in the Kenyan Mall Massacre,” “Judicial

posted 2:41:26am Oct. 07, 2013 | read full post »

How can Christians defend themselves against today's random violence?
So, a crazed gunman opens fire and you’re caught in the middle. How can you survive? Heroes come in all sorts of packages. And they wield all sorts of defensive weapons. Such as guns and Jesus. Sometimes both at the same time. [caption id="attachment_12246" align="alignleft" width="480"] Ant

posted 2:53:48pm Sep. 27, 2013 | read full post »

Does Sunday Morning Church Really Need All This Glitter, Showmanship and Gimmickry?
What’s wrong with church today? Are we in danger of turning worship into a flashy concert? Of watering down the message so nobody is offended? Of forgetting the simplicity of the Gospel? I grew up with a preacher’s kid. He was a fake following in the footsteps of his flimflamming father who d

posted 11:26:20am Sep. 20, 2013 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.