Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News


NBC Rejects Anti-Abortion Super Bowl Ad

posted by nsymmonds

WASHINGTON, Jan 30, 2009 (UPI via COMTEX) — A Chicago-based Catholic organization says NBC-TV won’t air an anti-abortion video during Sunday’s Super Bowl that portrays President Obama as an unborn child.
The spot has had more than 700,000 hits on YouTube since CatholicVote.org, a subsidiary of Fidelis, ran it on its Web site, The Washington Times reported Friday.
Brian Burch, president of Fidelis, said NBC originally responded to the group’s desire to run the spot with a proposal for a package costing $1.5 million to $1.8 million.
Burch says after his members pledged “significant dollars” for the project, NBC changed its mind.
Called “Imagine Spot 1,” the ad opens with an ultrasound of a child in utero set to violin music.
After detailing the child’s future as bleak, the voiceover announces the child will grow up to be the first African-American president of the United States as a photo of Obama flashes on the screen.
United Press International – January 30, 2009
Copyright 2009 by United Press International



Advertisement
Comments read comments(8)
post a comment
nnmns

posted January 30, 2009 at 7:28 pm


Strange taste, these anti-abortionists.
But NBC probably won’t advertise condoms either. I’d say it’s just staying away from percieved controversy.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted January 30, 2009 at 7:43 pm


This is the poorest taste for an advertisment I’ve ever heard of. To show such disrespect to Obama’s mother, father, and grandparents! To portray Barack Obama as a child that would never go any where because he was racially mixed. His parents were U. educated to begin with, and even if they weren’t what gall these people with Fidelis have. NBC should never have listened to them in the first place, but at least they let good sense come before big money. Why don’t they use their pile of money to help the poor?



report abuse
 

Henrietta22

posted January 30, 2009 at 7:47 pm


Again.



report abuse
 

pagansister

posted January 30, 2009 at 8:29 pm


Somewhere in my wanderings on the internet I have seen the proposed ad. If indeed NBC had decided to actually run it, then they should also have had a Pro-Choice ad. It seems that the Super Bowl would be a stange place to run ads for or against abortions!
I agree nnmns, doubt if there will be any condom ads. Talking frogs again, maybe……



report abuse
 

Tom

posted January 30, 2009 at 9:25 pm

Jesse Lewis

posted January 30, 2009 at 9:37 pm


It is my understanding that laws are meant to govern the unruley; not to endorse anything; anything we faithfully claim as our own. Somewhere there is a child of god who needs help making this decision, is my only concern. She probably won’t be watching the superbowl either.



report abuse
 

Anonymous

posted January 30, 2009 at 10:10 pm


Using him in the ad is not even good for their campaign, because Barack Obama’s parents were married and together during the first few years of his life. Most people who choose abortion are women who are not in as safe of an environment or a place in their life as his parents who were both highly educated. Most women choose this option because there is not another parent to help shoulder the responsibility.
It seems like so much sensationalism and more of an attack ad on the president. So I feel NBC, was wise to say no after the final concept came down the pipe.



report abuse
 

Mordred08

posted January 31, 2009 at 12:19 am


The irony is that a lot of the people who would agree with the commercial’s message probably voted for the other guy.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

Hispanics turning evangelical, Jews secular
Worship service attendance is up in New York City, but down among young adult Jews, according to recent studies. On the other hand, fewer Spanish-speaking teens are attending Catholic mass, but more are showing up at Evangelical churches. [caption id="attachment_12343" align="alignleft" width="48

posted 3:10:30pm Nov. 05, 2013 | read full post »

Billy Graham: I know where I'm going
“Daddy thinks the Lord will allow him to live to 95,” said Franklin Graham recently. It was not a prophecy but a hope, Franklin explained, that he would live to see the beginning of a Christian re

posted 10:02:01am Oct. 24, 2013 | read full post »

Are All These Christians' Complaints of Persecution Just So Much Empty Whining?
The headlines are alarming: “Catholic-Owned Company Wins Religious Freedom Court Decision,” “Death Toll Rises to 65 in Boko Haram Attack on Students,” “Little Sisters Catholic Charity Victimized By Obamacare,” “Christians Sought Out, Murdered in the Kenyan Mall Massacre,” “Judicial

posted 2:41:26am Oct. 07, 2013 | read full post »

How can Christians defend themselves against today's random violence?
So, a crazed gunman opens fire and you’re caught in the middle. How can you survive? Heroes come in all sorts of packages. And they wield all sorts of defensive weapons. Such as guns and Jesus. Sometimes both at the same time. [caption id="attachment_12246" align="alignleft" width="480"] Ant

posted 2:53:48pm Sep. 27, 2013 | read full post »

Does Sunday Morning Church Really Need All This Glitter, Showmanship and Gimmickry?
What’s wrong with church today? Are we in danger of turning worship into a flashy concert? Of watering down the message so nobody is offended? Of forgetting the simplicity of the Gospel? I grew up with a preacher’s kid. He was a fake following in the footsteps of his flimflamming father who d

posted 11:26:20am Sep. 20, 2013 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.