Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News


Catholic Theologian Richard John Neuhaus Dies at 72

posted by akornfeld

The Rev. Richard John Neuhaus, an eminent Catholic intellectual who tutored President Bush in Catholic social teaching and helped build the political coalition that made his election possible, died Thursday (Jan. 8) at age 72.
Neuhaus died soon after 10 a.m. of complications from cancer, according to a statement by First Things, the intellectual journal he founded in 1990.
Though he often portrayed himself as a simple priest, Neuhaus rose from a rabble-rousing leftist cleric in the 1960s to become a presidential mentor, helping Bush define his policies on gay marriage, abortion and stem-cell research, among other issues.
In 2005, Time magazine named the Catholic priest one of America’s 25 most influential evangelicals. “Father Richard helps me articulate these
(religious) things,” Bush said at the time.
The two met nearly a decade ago as Bush was considering a run for the White House.
“Father Neuhaus was an inspirational leader, admired theologian, and accomplished author who devoted his life to the service of the Almighty and to the betterment of our world,” Bush said in a statement Thursday. “He was also a dear friend, and I have treasured his wise counsel and guidance.”
The president also had Neuhaus to thank for forging religious conservatives — evangelicals, Catholics, Mormons, and Jews — into a potent electoral coalition, said Damon Linker, a former First Things staffer whose book “Theocons,” details Neuhaus’ influence.
In the 1990s, Neuhaus co-founded the group Evangelicals and Catholics Together with former Nixon White House counsel Charles Colson, which helped cement the political alliance between two groups that had long been suspicious of each other.
Bush’s election is often considered the crowning achievement of that coalition, which wed Catholic intellectualism and evangelical political savvy. After Paul Weyrich’s death in December, Neuhaus is the second leading architect of the modern religious right to die as Bush’s tenure winds to a close.
Born in 1936 in Ontario, Canada, to a Lutheran clergyman, Neuhaus himself was ordained a Lutheran minister, and in the 1960s, became involved in social justice causes — marching for civil rights with the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., and against the Vietnam war with Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel.
Neuhaus gradually became more conservative, however, breaking with the left over affirmative action and abortion. Throughout, the unmarried priest was a prolific writer, arguing in books and essays for religion to play a robust role in American culture.
His 1984 book, “The Naked Public Square: Religion and Democracy in America,” was “one of the most important, debate-changing books in the history of modern conservatism,” said Peter Wehner, a former Bush White House staffer.
William McGurn, Bush’s former chief speechwriter and longtime contributor to First Things, said “His theses nailed to the wall would be that nature and politics abhor a vacuum, and that without access to transcendent truth, democracy will degrade into relativism.”
In 1990, Neuhaus converted to Catholicism, a move that merited a profile in The New York Times. He was ordained a Catholic priest the following year.
The Rev. George Rutler, a fellow New York City priest, who reportedly administered last rites to Neuhaus, said his friend’s writings in First Things raised the level of conversation in America.
“Father Neuhaus elevated the debate about secular culture by showing that theological considerations engage the highest science of the mind, and are not cultural asides,” Rutler said in an e-mail. First Things, and his monthly column, “The Public Square,” “gave us a frame of reference for talking about the marginalization of the eternal verities,” Rutler said.
The Rev. Jim Martin, the associate editor of the Jesuit magazine America, called Neuhaus “an intelligent, impassioned and articulate defender of Catholic orthodoxy, the editor of a superb intellectual journal, and arguably the leading voice in conservative Catholic circles in this country.”
Neuhaus himself seemed to define his role in his 1975 book, “Time Toward Home: The American Experiment as Revelation.”
“Intellectuals are, broadly understood, those people who mint and market the metaphors by which a society understands itself,” Neuhaus wrote.
By Daniel Burke
Religion News Service
Copyright 2009 Religion News Service. All rights reserved. No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission.



  • nnmns

    “Neuhaus rose from a rabble-rousing leftist cleric in the 1960s to become a presidential mentor, helping Bush define his policies on gay marriage, abortion and stem-cell research, among other issues.”
    So he was a rabble rousing leftist cleric and then he helped GWB get elected and this twit thinks he “rose”! Daniel Burke hasn’t been paying any attention the last eight years or he’s happy the US is in the worst shape it’s been in for years.
    It strikes me Neuhaus was a detriment to his country if the article is factually accurate.

  • Nate W

    Bush’s stances on issues like abortion and embryonic stem cell research have nothing to do with the problems Bush has left us, nnmns, problems like an interminable war and a bad economy. If you think a few restrictios on abortion and stem cell research make this country such a horrible place, well, that’s just your own liberal opinion, one that no political conservative or orthodox Catholic is going to agree with. It doesn’t make much sense to accuse someone of not “paying any attention the last eight years” just because they don’t happen to agree with your stance on certain issues.
    From my perspective, Neuhaus’s legacy will be mixed, but his defense of the unborn and his awareness of the need for deeper and richer public discourse will forever be admirable.

  • nnmns

    However you feel about abortion and stem cells, Bush has left us in much worse condition than we were and here we are told Neuhause is significantly responsible for that.

  • Tom

    ‘Neuhaus gradually became more conservative, however, breaking with the left over affirmative action and abortion.’
    I vehemently disagree with this assertion. Neuhaus was probably never for affirmative action or abortion to begin with. The liberal left most probably attempted to uphold causes lobbied by special interests in the name of equality and womens’ rights and thus alienated itself from social conservatives such as Rev. Neuhaus. Rev. Martin Luther King himself was a Republican, and I’m not altogether sure that he’d approve of affirmative action, as I know he was vehemently against abortion. Had he lived on, I doubt it would have been an accurate depiction to say that he eventually ‘became more conservative’ had he not changed his mind or ‘progressed’ on social issues like abortion.

  • Nate W

    We’re told that Neuhaus helped Bush craft his positions on gay marriage, abortion, and stem cell research, not that Neuhaus was a mastermind behind the war in Iraq or questionable counter-terrorism measures or that he had anything to do with our present financial mess. So yes, this has everything to do with how you feel about abortion and embryonic stem cells, because it’s not at all clear what impact, if any, Neuhas had on the rest of it.

  • nnmns

    He helped Bush get elected, they say. If he talked to Bush for any period of time he should surely have realized he wasn’t fit to be President.

  • Tom

    In your face, Nate ;-)

  • Nate W

    Right, nnmns, because I’m sure you’ve spent your fair share of time talking with President Bush, haven’t you?

  • nnmns

    I’ve talked to cows, to religious bigots, to used car salesmen and to the occasional idiot. In each case it was obvious the individual should not be President of the USA. I’ve listened to GWB and it was also obvious in his case. Sarah Palin is another one. Sometimes it’s real clear.

  • Nate W

    Well, people far smarter than you didn’t think it was so clear. Get over yourself.

  • nnmns

    No, people far smarter than those who voted for Bush were real clear that he wasn’t qualified. I was only one of very, very many. Unfortunately for us all there were enough wrong-heads that the elections (at least the first) were close enough to steal.

  • pagansister

    And not only did some folks make the mistake of voting for “W” once…they made it worse by doing it TWICE!!! IMO, “W” didn’t win the first time…

Previous Posts

Hispanics turning evangelical, Jews secular
Worship service attendance is up in New York City, but down among young adult Jews, according to recent studies. On the other hand, fewer Spanish-speaking teens are attending Catholic mass, but more are showing up at Evangelical churches. [caption id="attachment_12343" align="alignleft" width="48

posted 3:10:30pm Nov. 05, 2013 | read full post »

Billy Graham: I know where I'm going
“Daddy thinks the Lord will allow him to live to 95,” said Franklin Graham recently. It was not a prophecy but a hope, Franklin explained, that he would live to see the beginning of a Christian re

posted 10:02:01am Oct. 24, 2013 | read full post »

Are All These Christians' Complaints of Persecution Just So Much Empty Whining?
The headlines are alarming: “Catholic-Owned Company Wins Religious Freedom Court Decision,” “Death Toll Rises to 65 in Boko Haram Attack on Students,” “Little Sisters Catholic Charity Victimized By Obamacare,” “Christians Sought Out, Murdered in the Kenyan Mall Massacre,” “Judicial

posted 2:41:26am Oct. 07, 2013 | read full post »

How can Christians defend themselves against today's random violence?
So, a crazed gunman opens fire and you’re caught in the middle. How can you survive? Heroes come in all sorts of packages. And they wield all sorts of defensive weapons. Such as guns and Jesus. Sometimes both at the same time. [caption id="attachment_12246" align="alignleft" width="480"] Ant

posted 2:53:48pm Sep. 27, 2013 | read full post »

Does Sunday Morning Church Really Need All This Glitter, Showmanship and Gimmickry?
What’s wrong with church today? Are we in danger of turning worship into a flashy concert? Of watering down the message so nobody is offended? Of forgetting the simplicity of the Gospel? I grew up with a preacher’s kid. He was a fake following in the footsteps of his flimflamming father who d

posted 11:26:20am Sep. 20, 2013 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.