Beliefnet News

Beliefnet News


Democrats Gain Traction with Faith-Based Voter Outreach

posted by akornfeld

When she was director of religious outreach for John Kerry’s Democratic presidential campaign four years ago, Mara Vanderslice could hardly have seemed lower on the campaign totem pole.
“I had one unpaid intern who didn’t have a phone,” she said. “We didn’t have a budget, and they never let me talk to the press.”
Her low status reflected a widely perceived unease in the Democratic Party at reaching out to voters on religious grounds.
What a difference four years can make. This election season has featured Democratic campaigns attempting to frame issues such as poverty, environmentalism and health care in religious contexts.
Political observers say the changes are evident in advertisements on Christian music stations, biblical references in stump speeches, and networking with pastors, as Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama and others in his party try to appeal to people who might view the party as hostile to religion.
“It could not have changed more in only four years,” Vanderslice said. “The Obama campaign has six staff people (on religious matters).
Josh DuBois (Obama’s head of religious outreach) is actively speaking to the press. They’re doing `Faith and Family’ tours.”
For her part, Vanderslice has formed a political action committee called The Matthew 25 Network, choosing the name from a well-known biblical passage in which Jesus prods people to help the “least of these” — the poor. The group has raised about $300,000 and is working on behalf of Obama.
The passage in the Book of Matthew, she said, “is a foundational teaching in the gospel for many Christians that put their faith into action or concern for the poor and for the `least of these.’ … We wanted to see that kind of Christian witness be lifted up, not just focused on abortion and traditional marriage.”
Another national consulting organization, the Eleison Group, is helping 20 Democratic congressional candidates with outreach to religious voters this year.
“There is definitely a greater awareness on the part of Democrats in general that we need to engage the faith community and shouldn’t write people off just because they go to church,” said Eric Sapp, a partner in the group, and Vanderslice’s former partner at Washington-based Common Good Strategies.
Scrutiny of Democrats’ religious backgrounds and beliefs has not always helped candidates. The words of Obama’s longtime and former pastor in Chicago, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, have hurt the candidate.
And a statement Obama made this summer to evangelicals about abortion — that determining the point where a baby gains rights was “above my pay grade” — was derided as flip, playing into conservative criticisms that these efforts are ultimately insincere.
Tom McClusky, vice president of government affairs for the Family Research Council, an influential conservative lobbying group, said he objects to the Democrats’ approach. He said it is morally problematic to equate poverty issues, as serious as they are, with abortion.
“It’s not that, as Christians or as people, we shouldn’t be helping out those who need it,” he said. “But when it comes right down to it, if you’re never born, you’re not going to be poor. If you’re not born, you’re not going to be afflicted with illnesses. They’re trying to say there’s some sort of equivalency when it comes to these issues. I personally think that’s wrong.”
Results of the Democratic efforts are hard to measure. This year, concerns over the economy, the war in Iraq, terrorism, health care and taxes are trumping the cultural issues like abortion and same-sex marriage that galvanized religious voters in 2004, pollsters say. Plus, while most surveys have Obama outperforming Kerry with Catholic and mainline Protestants, they also show him performing about as poorly as Kerry did — at about 20 percent — among white evangelicals who attend church at least once a week.
“There hasn’t been much gain for Obama on the white evangelicals,” said John Green, a pollster who is director of the Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics at the University of Akron. “It was always a bit of steep climb, because evangelicals are conservative on social issues. … There are Democrats on the pro-choice side that evangelicals find ways to vote for, but usually they’re more moderate.”
Vanderslice says her group, and others like it, are seeking to influence “moderate protestant Christians and Catholics” rather than the most conservative Christians.
The Matthew 25 Network runs its radio ads in battleground states, on Christian music stations with inexpensive rates.
Vanderslice said she hopes religious outreach becomes a permanent part of Democrat campaigns.
“It should be like we do outreach to student and women’s groups, to health care providers and union members,” she said of Democrats.
“Outreach to religious leaders and the faith community should be part and parcel of what we do, year in and year out, and what we stand for as a party.”
By Jeff Diamant
Religion News Service
(Jeff Diamant writes for The Star-Ledger in Newark, N.J.)
Copyright 2008 Religion News Service. All rights reserved. No part of this transmission may be distributed or reproduced without written permission.



  • nnmns

    We have so many really serious problems that this concentrating on abortion and homosexual marriage is just frivolous. Fix the economy, get our air on the way to being clean and our energy needs met. It matters a lot which candidate we elect for president as far as solving those really tough problems. Then with those in hand get to work on other problems and issues. So many of these people have the cart before the horse.

  • Nate W

    You can only call focusing on abortion “frivolous” if you’ve already made up your mind that there’s absolutely nothing wrong with it. If, however, you believe that abortion takes the life of human beings, it can never be a frivolous issue, and continuing to speak out against it becomes a prophetic act, a way of reminding the country that none of our problems have really been solved if the solutions don’t aid the unborn as well.

  • nnmns

    No, you could consider abortion a problem and realize it’s a minor problem. When we fought our wars abortion was one of the last things on our minds. Well we’re in wars. We are in a war against terrorism, we are in a war to prevent global warming from threatening our children and grandchildren and we are in a war to repair our economy. So to base your vote on abortion or homosexual marriage at a time like this is indeed frivolous.

  • Your Name

    If you believe that lives are actually being taken by something as common as abortion, there’s nothing frivolous about it.
    There will always be multiple issues on the forefront and most of the time fighting over whose issue is better, is just egodriven and complete nonsense.
    I believe that the issue of homosexual marriage is not a frivolous one either. It’s certainly a slap in the face to all those who face the injustice of its ban every day and have to live with the consequences.

  • Confessoressa

    Oh yeah, that was me. Not going into hiding just yet.

  • nnmns

    Well you have these religious leaders braying that people must vote based on abortion and homosexual marriage so I presume you consider that ego driven and complete nonsense. I could agree with you on that.

  • Pankaj

    Pennsylvania, that’s what hope is – that thing inside us that insists, despite all evidence to the contrary, that something better is waiting around the bend; that insists there are better days ahead. If we’re willing to work for it. If we’re willing to shed our fears and our doubts. If we’re willing to reach deep down inside ourselves when we’re tired and come back fighting harder.-Barack Obama Oct 28th

  • Henrietta22

    Pankaj, great quote from Obama. He’s right, that’s what hope is.

  • nnmns
  • pagansister

    Have to agree with the above folks that realize that this election is not based on abortion rights or homosexual rights…it is “the economy stupid”, clean air, protecting our country, the wars we are currently in need solving, not depending on one source for energy so expanding our options, etc. Homosexual marriage is important, as is continuing the right to choose for women, but to base a vote on only those 2 issues is not, realizing the others are very important.

  • Henrietta22

    Vanderslice said her group and others like it are seeking to influence Moderate Christians, and Catholics, and not the most conservative Christians.
    Since that is how I’ve lived from the 30’s until now I’m happy to hear this.

  • Nate W

    Apparently you would think worrying about the Holocaust during bad economic times would be frivolous too, right?
    What can’t you people get? Some people belive that the unborn are human beings with a right to life, and the murder of millions is not frivolous to us in any way, shape, or form. But you people have shown repeatedly that you lack understand the pro-life position, and you’ve shown it again by accusing us of frivolity just because we want to ensure that the benefits of good government and economic prosperity can be enjoyed by all, not just by the powerful who subject life and death to a matter of individual choice.

  • pagansister

    Nate W, Interesting comparison, Holocaust and abortion.
    If a person can’t pay their bills, is loosing their home, is out of work, or if they have a child or husband or father in Iraq or Afganistan, etc. do you think their first priority is whether a woman is considering an abortion? No, their first concern is voting for a candidate that might just get us out of the mess this country is in. If indeed that candidate also happens to support a woman’s right to choose, then that’s the way it is.
    “We people” understand the pro-life position very well. As for economic prosperity and good government benefits can again be enjoyed by all if the right person is voted in. Then women can hopefully still have control their own bodies. Nov. 4 can’t come soon enough.

Previous Posts

Hispanics turning evangelical, Jews secular
Worship service attendance is up in New York City, but down among young adult Jews, according to recent studies. On the other hand, fewer Spanish-speaking teens are attending Catholic mass, but more are showing up at Evangelical churches. [caption id="attachment_12343" align="alignleft" width="48

posted 3:10:30pm Nov. 05, 2013 | read full post »

Billy Graham: I know where I'm going
“Daddy thinks the Lord will allow him to live to 95,” said Franklin Graham recently. It was not a prophecy but a hope, Franklin explained, that he would live to see the beginning of a Christian re

posted 10:02:01am Oct. 24, 2013 | read full post »

Are All These Christians' Complaints of Persecution Just So Much Empty Whining?
The headlines are alarming: “Catholic-Owned Company Wins Religious Freedom Court Decision,” “Death Toll Rises to 65 in Boko Haram Attack on Students,” “Little Sisters Catholic Charity Victimized By Obamacare,” “Christians Sought Out, Murdered in the Kenyan Mall Massacre,” “Judicial

posted 2:41:26am Oct. 07, 2013 | read full post »

How can Christians defend themselves against today's random violence?
So, a crazed gunman opens fire and you’re caught in the middle. How can you survive? Heroes come in all sorts of packages. And they wield all sorts of defensive weapons. Such as guns and Jesus. Sometimes both at the same time. [caption id="attachment_12246" align="alignleft" width="480"] Ant

posted 2:53:48pm Sep. 27, 2013 | read full post »

Does Sunday Morning Church Really Need All This Glitter, Showmanship and Gimmickry?
What’s wrong with church today? Are we in danger of turning worship into a flashy concert? Of watering down the message so nobody is offended? Of forgetting the simplicity of the Gospel? I grew up with a preacher’s kid. He was a fake following in the footsteps of his flimflamming father who d

posted 11:26:20am Sep. 20, 2013 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.