Movie Mom

Movie Mom


posted by Nell Minow
Lowest Recommended Age:High School
MPAA Rating:Rated R For strong violence, disturbing images, and sexuality
Profanity:Brief strong language
Nudity/Sex:Animal (and brief human) sexual situations and childbirth, sexual references, threatened sexual assault and some grabbing
Alcohol/Drugs:Theme of the film is drug dealing and effects of illegal drugs
Violence/Scariness:Extensive action-style violence with shoot-outs, knives, fights, car chases and crashes, surgery, many characters injured and killed, some disturbing images
Diversity Issues:Diverse characters
Movie Release Date:July 25, 2014
DVD Release Date:January 19, 2015
Lowest Recommended Age: High School
MPAA Rating: Rated R For strong violence, disturbing images, and sexuality
Profanity: Brief strong language
Nudity/Sex: Animal (and brief human) sexual situations and childbirth, sexual references, threatened sexual assault and some grabbing
Alcohol/Drugs: Theme of the film is drug dealing and effects of illegal drugs
Violence/Scariness: Extensive action-style violence with shoot-outs, knives, fights, car chases and crashes, surgery, many characters injured and killed, some disturbing images
Diversity Issues: Diverse characters
Movie Release Date: July 25, 2014
DVD Release Date: January 19, 2015
Copyright 2014 Universal Pictures

Copyright 2014 Universal Pictures

I always enjoy Luc Besson’s stylish car chases and shootouts. I like his use of locations, his strong female characters, and unexpected flashes of sentiment in the midst of mayhem.  While I found much to like in this story about a young woman who gains superpowers through a new drug, it was a mistake to have her show less emotion as she becomes physically and emotionally stronger.  Instead of sentiment, this time Besson inserts some preachy ruminations on the meaning of life.  I’m not opposed to existential ponderings in the middle of a crashes and explosions film.  But they need to be a little less silly and a lot less intrusive.


For a moment, I thought we were back on the Planet of the Apes or perhaps picking up some deleted scenes from “Tree of Life” as we returned to the dawn of time with the earliest hominids.  But no, this is just some sort of context for what is to come.  Our heroine, you see, shares a name with the skeleton of the oldest human remains, thought of as the first woman.

We then meet our present-day Lucy, standing on the sidewalk, arguing with her boyfriend of a week, who is trying to persuade her to deliver a briefcase for him.  She may not be very focused, but she is sharp enough to know that he and the deal he is proposing are both very sketchy.  But she is not smart enough to walk away before he can handcuff her to the case and shove her toward the door.  She has no choice.  She walks into the building.  The boyfriend gets shot.  And she is hustled upstairs but a lot of very scary-looking guys in black suits.


She is soon knocked out, and awakens to find that a pouch of a powerful new drug has been sewn into her abdomen.  She is one of four mules to be sent to cities across Europe to deliver the drug.  But before she leaves, a thug kicks her in the belly, the pouch opens, and the drug, a synthetic version of a chemical essential in fetal development, goes into her bloodstream and she is suddenly super-smart, super-powerful, and super-mad.  Also, she can time-travel, sweeping eras to the side like Tinder rejects.


Meanwhile, all of that brain power has not led her to the obvious conclusion that wiping out all of the bad guys who are in charge of distribution of the new drug is not going to solve very much if there are still people out there manufacturing it.

For a while it is fun to see her think, kick, punch, stab, and, yes, levitate the bad guys.  But there are too many returns to Morgan Freeman lecturing a group of students about what would happen if we used more than ten percent of our brains (by the way, that old myth has no more basis in reality than this movie does) and the decision to make Lucy increasingly robotic in demeanor as she gets more cerebrally enhanced lessens the narrative propulsion and emotional heft to the storyline. She also loses a lot of our sympathy when she engages in needless murders of innocent parties. I like Luc Besson. But I think he was using less than ten percent of his brain when he wrote this one.


Parents should know that this film includes extensive action-style violence with many characters injured and killed, lots of guns, knives, surgery, car chases and crashes, fights, threat of sexual assault with some grabbing, explicit scenes of animal and brief human sex and childbirth, sexual references, brief strong language, theme of drug dealing and effects of illegal drugs

Family discussion: If you could access more of your brain capacity, what would you use it for? Why did Lucy become less emotional as she got smarter?

If you like this, try: “The Transporter” and “Limitless”

  • Donna Kazee

    Forgoing the inaccuracy that we use only 10% of our brains, my major issue with the movie was that it didn’t feel like it knew what kind of movie it was, a movie about a kidnapping and drug-implanting or a movie about accessing the unused capacity of the human mind. If that makes sense. I felt an inordinately large amount of time was spent in showing how bad the bad guys were and how the drugs got into her, as well as the very obvious lack of relationship she had with the boyfriend who gets her into the trouble. I wanted to see more of the transformation, and yes, less of the other images inserted throughout the film (although I didn’t mind them in general). However, I disagree with you on her becoming less emotional as she accessed more of her brain. I thought that might be a very accurate portrayal, as she had to filter all her emotions through the vast knowledge she was experiencing. I would equate it to getting an enormous amount of bad news. When we found out our newborn son had a life-threatening bowel condition, the sudden overwhelming information combined with the intense love and fear of loss and all the myriad of emotions that you can feel simultaneously, caused a sort of circuit overload. I had to push the emotions to the back burner to make quick decisions. Lucy realized her legacy was in the information she could leave humankind, so she did whatever she needed to get that done. It was, in the end, all about time.

    • Nell Minow

      I can understand why her expanding intellect and limited time would push emotions aside — I just think that reduced the connection with the character, especially since her conversation with her mother seemed to indicate that her increased intellect deepened her understanding of the importance of human connection. I agree with you about the bad guys — also, if she’s so smart, why doesn’t she try to stop the production of the drug?

      • Donna Kazee

        It is funny where different people get “hung up” on movie plot holes! Emotion does tend to cause delays in action, I think. I agree that it caused us to disconnect personally with her as audience. However, I saw it as her realizing her time was running out and the greatest gift she could leave humanity was essentially reproducing herself (was this also immortalizing herself?) to share that vast amount of knowledge with the world. All other issues, including the production of the drug, were insignificant in comparison.

        • Nell Minow

          I think we can all identify with the impulse to leave a legacy, especially to share what we have learned. And I like the idea that someone who possesses the ultimate wisdom comes to the same conclusion.

  • Pingback: Film: Lucy | MijnBreinTV

Previous Posts

The Meddler
Marnie (Susan Sarandon) is the irresistible force who, just before this movie starts, meets the immovable object: devastating grief in ...

posted 11:42:17am May. 01, 2016 | read full post »

May 2016: Movies This Month
Happy May! The blockbuster movie season officially starts this week with the latest superhero movie from Marvel, and the month will end with another superhero movie as well. But we'll get some good smaller movies, too. Here's what I'm looking ...

posted 12:18:04am May. 01, 2016 | read full post »

Trailer: The Magnificent Seven (and the Earlier Versions)
Denzel Washington, Vincent D'Onofrio, Matt Bomer, Ethan Hawke, Vinnie Jones, Peter Sarsgaard, and Chris Pratt star in the remake of "The Magnificent Seven," and they've released a teaser ...

posted 3:10:55pm Apr. 29, 2016 | read full post »

Bono is Making a Film About the Psalms with Pastor Eugene Peterson
[iframe width="560" height="315" src="" frameborder="0"] Rock star and humanitarian Bono and retired Presbyterian Pastor Eugene Peterson have teamed up to release a new documentary about the book of Psalms. ...

posted 8:00:30am Apr. 29, 2016 | read full post »

I laughed so much and so hard at this movie that by the time it was over I had become of those Key and Peele show parking valets. I just ...

posted 5:58:07pm Apr. 28, 2016 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.