Movie Mom

Movie Mom


One for the Money

posted by Nell Minow
C
Lowest Recommended Age:Mature High Schooler
MPAA Rating:Rated PG-13 for violence, sexual references and language, some drug material and partial nudity
Profanity:Strong and crude language for a PG-13, "crap," f-word
Nudity/Sex:Sexual references, some coarse, partial nudity including rear shot of a naked old man, prostitutes
Alcohol/Drugs:Drinking, drug dealing
Violence/Scariness:Crime-style violence with characters injured and killed, guns
Diversity Issues:Diverse characters, some stereotyping
Movie Release Date:January 27, 2012
DVD Release Date:May 15, 2012

Someday to be used in film schools as a textbook example of how not to adapt a best-selling novel for the screen, “One for the Money” is mis-cast, mis-scripted, and mis-directed in every category.  Janet Evanovich’s popular series of series of books about lingerie saleswoman-turned bounty hunter Stephanie Plum seemed like a sure bet.  But what’s not a sure bet is an actress who signs on as producer so she can cast herself in what turns out to be a misbegotten vanity project.

Katherine Heigl is a beautiful actress whose greatest attribute is an imperishable freshness.  In the right movie, like “Knocked Up,” that works in her favor. Surrounded by the crudest possible material the contrast she provided gave warmth and romance to the film.  But her range is limited and she is way beyond her capacity as a gritty Jersey girl who once ran over the guy who never called after they had sex on the floor of the bakery where she was working.  Stephanie Plum is not supposed to be perky and adorable.  She’s supposed to be sadder but wiser, determined, and, above all, game.  Director Julie Ann Robinson has more experience with television (“Two Broke Girls,” Heigl’s “Grey’s Anatomy”) and never finds the right rhythm for the material.  It is lumpen and awkward and it telegraphs its surprises.  And just because it is written, directed, and produced by women does not keep it from being sexist, with some unfortunate stereotyped sassy black hookers thrown in for added discomfort.

YouTube Preview Image

It is hard to work up the energy to be offended by the stereotypes, though, when one is suffocating from the lethargy induced by the movie’s sluggish pacing and the fog induced by Heigl’s attempts at snappy dialog and a New Jersey accent.

Stephanie is a divorcee (“I had a husband.  I didn’t like it.  I don’t want another one.”) who lost her job selling lingerie and is about to lose her car for failure to keep up the payments.  Her cousin is a bail bondsman who needs someone to help with filing.  She blackmails him into giving it to her and then realizes that the real money is in bounty hunting and that the number one fugitive is Joe Morelli (Jason O’Mara), a cop charged with murder who in one of the movie’s most tiresome contrivances, has a past connection with Stephanie.  Everyone in Trenton has a past connection with Stephanie.

We are then treated to a series of scenes in which Stephanie gets some guidance on bounty hunting from the hunky Ranger (Daniel Sunjata, another “Grey’s Anatomy” transplant) and has a series of cat-and-mouse encounters with Joe (the hunky Jason O’Mara of “Life on Mars”), trading painful quips that are supposed to be flirtatious but thud with a squish like overripe grapefruit.  The mixed messages (Joe may be on the lam and handcuff her, naked, to the shower rod but he brings her coffee in bed) would be annoying if the whole movie was not too lethargic to merit that much attention.

 

Parents should know that this movie has some rough material for a PG-13, including strong and crude language, sexual references and partial nudity, drug dealing, and violence (characters injured and killed).

Family discussion: What makes Stephanie good at her job?  What makes her like this job?

If you like this, try: the books by Janet Evanovich and the far better (R-rated) bounty hunter movie, “Midnight Run”



  • http://AddaURLtothiscomment Big Dave

    You didn’t say whether you’re fan of the Stephanie Plum series. That may have made a difference. My wife and her sister have read all the books, some more than once. They found the movie entertaining though they were troubled as well by the casting, except for Lulu’s character. They thought she was spot-on. Since I was dragged along too, I’ll say the movie was watchable but no better in quality than many of the made-for-TV movies you can see any day. Okay, since I’m a guy, I’ll admit I liked the scene with Katherine Heigl handcuffed in the shower. THAT you won’t see in a made for TV movie.

    • Nell Minow

      Thanks, Big Dave. Glad to hear that fans of the book thought the movie had some merit.

  • http://AddaURLtothiscomment April

    I think maybe you are not a fan of Janet’s books or maybe didn’t read them all. Some of your negative comments are about scenes that actually happen in the book. I agree that some of the casting would not have been my first choice (Ranger for example) but I think if you are a fan of the books you will enjoy the movie.

    • Nell Minow

      Thanks, April! I didn’t object to the characters or the incidents, just the way they were adapted to the screen. If it had had a different cast and director it could have been as good as the books.

  • http://AddaURLtothiscomment JACK

    I like stereotypes, and I find them Funny. Also I’m proud to be sexist

    • Nell Minow

      Thanks, Jack, you are hilarious! Fortunately for you, I always mention those elements of a movie so keep coming back for guidance to help you find the movies you will enjoy.

  • http://AddaURLtothiscomment Rebecca

    I am reading her entire series of books – I am up to book 14, and love them!! I hesitate to see the movie because I don’t want the ‘characters’ to ruin the rest of the books for me. I just can’t see the characters that were chosen to match up what is in my mind when I read the books. Thanks for the information – I will hold off on seeing the movie for now. Thanks!

    • Nell Minow

      I totally understand, Rebecca!

  • http://AddaURLtothiscomment Sarash

    I love the books ,but the movies was so sad and flat it was also cut all over the place with no flow and no laugh out loud comedy.

Previous Posts

Wild's Cheryl Strayed Has a New Advice Podcast
Before Wild, Cheryl Strayed was the pseudonymous "Dear Sugar" advice columnist for The Rumpus. Her columns were collected in Tiny Beautiful Things: Advice on Love and Life from Dear Sugar. Writer Steve Almond (Candyfreak: A Journey through the Chocolate Underbelly of America) also wrote as Dear Su

posted 3:59:40pm Dec. 19, 2014 | read full post »

Actors Of Color Discuss Racial Stereotypes In Hollywood
Film Courage produced this excellent and very compelling film with actors of color talking about the challenges they face in Hollywood. If we did a better job of representing diversity in film, we would not just tell better stories and tell stories better, we would make better progress toward under

posted 8:00:49am Dec. 19, 2014 | read full post »

Annie
The story of the plucky little Depression-era orphan with the curly red hair has been not just re-booted but re-imagined into the world of rent-a-bikes, viral videos, DNA tests, YOLO, corpora

posted 5:59:13pm Dec. 18, 2014 | read full post »

Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb
Fans of the first two "Night at the Museum" films will like this one because it is pretty much the same film. They go to another museum, this time the British Museum in London, and the exhibi

posted 5:23:46pm Dec. 18, 2014 | read full post »

Listen to People's Lives: David Plotz's Working Podcast
Former Slate editor David Plotz, now at Atlas Obscura, says that he is a big fan of Studs Terkel's classic book Working: People Talk About What They Do All Day and How They Feel About What They Do. He has paid tribute to that great work in the best possible way, by updating it with his podcast seri

posted 3:59:23pm Dec. 18, 2014 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.