Movie Mom

Movie Mom

Now I Am Getting Excited About ‘Avatar 2′

posted by Nell Minow

I just read something that made me very excited about James Cameron’s upcoming sequel to “Avatar.”  The first one was a leap forward in technology of 3D and motion capture (now often called “performance capture” to emphasize the contribution of the actors).  And now Cameron is making what I think of as an even bigger technological leap forward with the announcement that he is going to increase the frames-per-second (fps) rate.  Ever since the movies went from silent to sound, the standard has been 24 fps.  Interestingly, “The Artist,” this year’s silent, black-and-white release, was shot at a 22 fps rate, prevalent in the pre-sound era.  The only reason film-making has been stuck at 24 fps is that all the cameras and projectors are set up that way.  But increasing the fps makes the film images stunningly sharper, deeper, and richer.  Cameron has said he will shot “Avatar 2″ at 48 and possibly even 60 fps, and Peter Jackson is shooting “The Hobbit” at 48 fps.  This is a much more significant improvement than 3D, especially post-production 3D, which has just been announced for “The Avengers.”


As home technology improves, with HD, bigger screens, and better sound, it is increasingly important for movie theaters to find ways to stay competitive.  If these films, certain to be blockbusters, can inspire more theaters to install projectors capable of giving ticket-buyers the 48- and 60-fps experience, they will raise the standard for all movies going forward.

  • Nixter

    I have seen posts on forums stating that frame rate has no effect on visual quality, this is incorrect! The difference between 30fps and 60fps on my video camera is VERY noticeable, with viewers often asking me, why does that look so good? When viewed on a proper HD display, anyone can see the difference.

    • Nell Minow

      Now I’m even more excited, thanks, Nixter!

Previous Posts

Independent Spirit Nominees 2015
The Spirit Awards are like the Oscars for independent films. Some of them have big stars and some are distributed by big studios. Some are made by first-time filmmakers on budgets that would barely pay for one day's catering fees on a studio ...

posted 7:49:50pm Nov. 24, 2015 | read full post »

The most romantic movie of the year is "Carol," based on a novel by Patricia Highsmith, the author of Strangers on a Train and The ...

posted 5:54:13pm Nov. 24, 2015 | read full post »

The Good Dinosaur
"The Good Dinosaur" is the good movie. Not the great movie. Not the especially memorable movie. Just the perfectly nice and pleasant movie, much ...

posted 5:43:47pm Nov. 24, 2015 | read full post »

Is "Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever" the Worst Movie of All Time?
It was a lot of fun to talk to Libby Coleman about "Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever." In an article for Ozy, Coleman says that by one standard it is the worst film of all time (or at least since the internet began keeping track) -- it has 115 negative ...

posted 10:29:10am Nov. 24, 2015 | read full post »

Win a Suffragette Prize Package!
Suffragette, directed by Sarah Gavron, is the story of the fight to give women the right to vote in the UK, as Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady ...

posted 8:00:58am Nov. 24, 2015 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.