Movie Mom

Movie Mom

Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps

posted by Nell Minow
Lowest Recommended Age:High School
MPAA Rating:Rated PG-13 for brief strong language and thematic elements
Profanity:Some strong language
Nudity/Sex:Sexual references and non-explicit situations
Alcohol/Drugs:Drinking, smoking, references to drug overdose
Violence/Scariness:Tense confrontations, suicides
Diversity Issues:None
Movie Release Date:September 24, 2010
DVD Release Date:December 14, 2010

Is greed still good? Does greed still, for want of a better word, work?
Twenty-three years later, Gordon Gekko is back, still played by Oscar-winner Michael Douglas and now running short on money and even shorter on what he realizes is an even more valuable commodity: time. We see him being released from prison, his personal effects including a gold money clip (empty) and his old cellular phone (the size of a shoebox). He walks out into the sunlight toward a sleek black limo only to see that it is there for someone else, the also-departing rap star.
Balzac famously said that behind every great fortune is a crime. That is literally true in Gekko’s case; he traded on inside information. But it is also true in a larger sense because the real reason for Gekko’s wealth is a fierce and unquenchable passion not for money but for winning. He has had a long time in prison to watch and think and plan his comeback. And so he leverages his notoriety into television and in-person appearances to promote his book.
The sequel is so close to the same framework as the original that at times it feels like a remake. Again there is a bright, ambitious and essentially honest young man with a lower-income parent exemplifying the current financial upheavals who gets drawn by Gekko’s gravitational pull. It’s Jake (Shia LaBeouf), who has the added complication of being engaged to Gekko’s estranged daughter (“An Education’s” Carey Mulligan, LeBeouf’s real-life love). And there is another big-time financier like the one played by Terence Stamp in the first film, Bretton James, played by Josh Brolin. Once again, there is an old guy who is the movie’s repository of wisdom and integrity (a fine Eli Wallach). Once again, the young man thinks he can hold on to his values and once again he will find Wall Street is more treacherous than he thought.
In his brilliant book on the financial meltdown, The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine, Michael Lewis muses that his first expose of the wild world of Wall Street excess, Liar’s Poker was instead viewed “as a how-to manual.” The same is true for the first “Wall Street.” As the costume designer noted, the wardrobe from the first movie was selected for dramatic impact, not authenticity. But it was adopted by the real Wall Streeters, who were as thrilled with Gekko’s look as they were with his bravado, and his wealth.
While Douglas continues to be enough to make the entire movie worth watching, there is little chemistry with LeBoeuf or between LeBoeuf and Mulligan. The first film was an intriguing look at a hidden world. But today, with business news on the front pages and the editorial pages, on 24/7 news channels and thousands of websites, Wall Streeters are less often seen as dashing buccaneers than as the people most responsible for bringing the United States to the brink of economic destruction. The movie itself seems as though it cannot make up its mind what it wants from Gekko.

Parents should know that this film includes sexual references and non-explicit situations, a few strong words, discussion of suicide and drug overdose, family confrontations, unethical behavior, and vicious business battles.
Family discussion: Is greed good? What has and hasn’t changed in the way we see the real Wall Street since the first film?
If you like this, try: the original “Wall Street” and the documentary “Inside Job” and the books The Big Short and 13 Bankers. For some of my other thoughts about this movie, see these interviews from Portfolioist and Motley Fool.

  • sara

    What exactly is a non-explicit situation?

  • Tom Clocker – Baltimore Movie Examiner

    Great review once again. My thoughts about the film’s weaknesses seem in line with yours. I thought the love angle subplot, while acting well, was too time consuming and too distracting. As a matter of fact the resolution of that subplot overshadows the resolution of the main plot about the money. I’m also not sure the characters would end up where they did. It didn’t quite fit the way they were portrayed the rest of the film.
    Still I thought it was pretty great: 8.75 out of 10!
    If my guess is correct, Nell is referring to a scene where Jake and Winnie are rolling around in a bed first thing in the morning. They are clothed (for the most part) and just ‘spoon’ a bit. That’s about the extent of the sexuality, other than maybe a few references in dialogue.

  • Nell Minow

    Sara, it is a situation that implies that sex is about to or has just occurred but does not show the activity itself.

  • Alicia

    Hi, Nell. I like your review, and I saw the movie yesterday. I can honestly say that this is the first time I’ve ever really liked an Oliver Stone movie. I thought he managed to get in plenty of insight into the financial crisis while at the same time making a really entertaining movie.
    LeBoeuf and Mulligan are both very winning actors, though sometimes they seemed to be in a different movie than one about Wall Street. I thought Frank Langella and Josh Brolin were especially good in their supporting roles. For me, the main source of the movie’s suspense and tension was Michael Douglas’ performance as Gordon Gekko. Could he really change his spots? I’m not sure that part of the movie (towards the end) really made that much sense. Nice touch to have that horrible portrait of Saturn eating one of his children in the wall of Bretton James’ office. But, overall, I really liked this movie.

  • Richard Choffe

    my poem with title quoting Kirk Douglas
    “Those who have more should give to those who have less”
    Wealth is neither good or bad, a give and take of greed or need,
    Be generous, make happy the sad, Reciprocate His Bountiful seed,
    Grow you enough for Him to Bless,
    “Those who have more should give to those who have less”.

  • Nell Minow

    Thank you, Mr. Choffe.

Previous Posts

The Woman in Gold
The very title is a form of theft. When Gustav Klimt painted the portrait that gives this film its name, he called it "Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer." She was a warm, vibrant young woman

posted 5:58:01pm Mar. 31, 2015 | read full post »

Interview: The Woman in Gold's Simon Curtis and E. Randol Schoenberg
Director Simon Curtis told me, "My last film was My Week with Marilyn, and this one is my century with Maria."  He is referring to "The Woman in Gold," with Helen Mirren as Maria Altmann, who brought a lawsuit to get back the portrait of her aunt Adele, painted by Gustav Klimt, which had been stole

posted 3:37:47pm Mar. 31, 2015 | read full post »

Faith-Based Movie Picks -- The Today Show
In honor of Easter and Passover, the Today Show has some good suggestions for faith-based movies, from the very serious and respectful to the light-hearted.

posted 3:13:29pm Mar. 31, 2015 | read full post »

Another "Star is Born" Movie? Possibly, with Bradley Cooper as Director and Beyonce to Star!
A movie that's already been done three times (at least) may just get yet another remake if the rumors are true that Bradley Cooper will direct and Beyoncé will appear in "A Star is Born."  The original 1937 version, said to be inspired by (among others) the marriage of aging vaudeville star Al Jol

posted 3:54:02pm Mar. 30, 2015 | read full post »

Exclusive Clip and Contest: What Would Jesus Do -- The Journey Continues
We are honored to present an exclusive clip from "WWJD (What Would Jesus Do): The Journey Continues," inspired by the best-selling classic book In His Steps. WWJD: The Journey Continues is availab

posted 3:40:29pm Mar. 30, 2015 | read full post »

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.