Movie Mom

Movie Mom


Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps

posted by Nell Minow
B
Lowest Recommended Age:High School
MPAA Rating:Rated PG-13 for brief strong language and thematic elements
Profanity:Some strong language
Nudity/Sex:Sexual references and non-explicit situations
Alcohol/Drugs:Drinking, smoking, references to drug overdose
Violence/Scariness:Tense confrontations, suicides
Diversity Issues:None
Movie Release Date:September 24, 2010
DVD Release Date:December 14, 2010

Is greed still good? Does greed still, for want of a better word, work?
Twenty-three years later, Gordon Gekko is back, still played by Oscar-winner Michael Douglas and now running short on money and even shorter on what he realizes is an even more valuable commodity: time. We see him being released from prison, his personal effects including a gold money clip (empty) and his old cellular phone (the size of a shoebox). He walks out into the sunlight toward a sleek black limo only to see that it is there for someone else, the also-departing rap star.
Balzac famously said that behind every great fortune is a crime. That is literally true in Gekko’s case; he traded on inside information. But it is also true in a larger sense because the real reason for Gekko’s wealth is a fierce and unquenchable passion not for money but for winning. He has had a long time in prison to watch and think and plan his comeback. And so he leverages his notoriety into television and in-person appearances to promote his book.
The sequel is so close to the same framework as the original that at times it feels like a remake. Again there is a bright, ambitious and essentially honest young man with a lower-income parent exemplifying the current financial upheavals who gets drawn by Gekko’s gravitational pull. It’s Jake (Shia LaBeouf), who has the added complication of being engaged to Gekko’s estranged daughter (“An Education’s” Carey Mulligan, LeBeouf’s real-life love). And there is another big-time financier like the one played by Terence Stamp in the first film, Bretton James, played by Josh Brolin. Once again, there is an old guy who is the movie’s repository of wisdom and integrity (a fine Eli Wallach). Once again, the young man thinks he can hold on to his values and once again he will find Wall Street is more treacherous than he thought.
In his brilliant book on the financial meltdown, The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine, Michael Lewis muses that his first expose of the wild world of Wall Street excess, Liar’s Poker was instead viewed “as a how-to manual.” The same is true for the first “Wall Street.” As the costume designer noted, the wardrobe from the first movie was selected for dramatic impact, not authenticity. But it was adopted by the real Wall Streeters, who were as thrilled with Gekko’s look as they were with his bravado, and his wealth.
While Douglas continues to be enough to make the entire movie worth watching, there is little chemistry with LeBoeuf or between LeBoeuf and Mulligan. The first film was an intriguing look at a hidden world. But today, with business news on the front pages and the editorial pages, on 24/7 news channels and thousands of websites, Wall Streeters are less often seen as dashing buccaneers than as the people most responsible for bringing the United States to the brink of economic destruction. The movie itself seems as though it cannot make up its mind what it wants from Gekko.


Parents should know that this film includes sexual references and non-explicit situations, a few strong words, discussion of suicide and drug overdose, family confrontations, unethical behavior, and vicious business battles.
Family discussion: Is greed good? What has and hasn’t changed in the way we see the real Wall Street since the first film?
If you like this, try: the original “Wall Street” and the documentary “Inside Job” and the books The Big Short and 13 Bankers. For some of my other thoughts about this movie, see these interviews from Portfolioist and Motley Fool.



  • sara

    What exactly is a non-explicit situation?

  • http://www.examiner.com/movie-in-baltimore/tom-clocker Tom Clocker – Baltimore Movie Examiner

    Nell,
    Great review once again. My thoughts about the film’s weaknesses seem in line with yours. I thought the love angle subplot, while acting well, was too time consuming and too distracting. As a matter of fact the resolution of that subplot overshadows the resolution of the main plot about the money. I’m also not sure the characters would end up where they did. It didn’t quite fit the way they were portrayed the rest of the film.
    Still I thought it was pretty great: 8.75 out of 10!
    http://www.examiner.com/movie-in-baltimore/movie-review-wall-street-money-never-sleeps-8-75-out-of-10-review
    Sara,
    If my guess is correct, Nell is referring to a scene where Jake and Winnie are rolling around in a bed first thing in the morning. They are clothed (for the most part) and just ‘spoon’ a bit. That’s about the extent of the sexuality, other than maybe a few references in dialogue.

  • http://blog.beliefnet.com/moviemom/ Nell Minow

    Sara, it is a situation that implies that sex is about to or has just occurred but does not show the activity itself.

  • Alicia

    Hi, Nell. I like your review, and I saw the movie yesterday. I can honestly say that this is the first time I’ve ever really liked an Oliver Stone movie. I thought he managed to get in plenty of insight into the financial crisis while at the same time making a really entertaining movie.
    LeBoeuf and Mulligan are both very winning actors, though sometimes they seemed to be in a different movie than one about Wall Street. I thought Frank Langella and Josh Brolin were especially good in their supporting roles. For me, the main source of the movie’s suspense and tension was Michael Douglas’ performance as Gordon Gekko. Could he really change his spots? I’m not sure that part of the movie (towards the end) really made that much sense. Nice touch to have that horrible portrait of Saturn eating one of his children in the wall of Bretton James’ office. But, overall, I really liked this movie.

  • Richard Choffe

    my poem with title quoting Kirk Douglas
    “Those who have more should give to those who have less”
    Wealth is neither good or bad, a give and take of greed or need,
    Be generous, make happy the sad, Reciprocate His Bountiful seed,
    Grow you enough for Him to Bless,
    “Those who have more should give to those who have less”.

  • http://blog.beliefnet.com/moviemom/ Nell Minow

    Thank you, Mr. Choffe.

Previous Posts

How Do Movies Show Time Passing?
Someone once said that movies are "pieces of time." A few take place in "real time." Alfred Hitchcock's experiment, "Rope," unfolds in just the time it takes us to watch it, all in what appears to be one seamless shot. But others take place over days, weeks, years, even generations. Slavko Vorkap

posted 8:00:40am Jul. 22, 2014 | read full post »

Boring TV Makes You Fat
A new study finds that boring television leads to mindless snacking and that leads to putting on pounds. So, watch programs that excite and engage you. Or, if the show is boring, turn off the television.

posted 8:00:05am Jul. 22, 2014 | read full post »

Switched at Birth and the End of Life
I'm a big fan of ABC Family's Switched at Birth and have appreciated its complicated characters, honest and heartfelt relationships, and compelling storylines, as well as its unprecedented, in-depth portrayal of the deaf community. Last week's episode may have been the all-time best (SPOILER ALERT)

posted 3:59:49pm Jul. 21, 2014 | read full post »

Comic-Con 2014
It's here!  San Diego Comic-Con begins Wednesday night in San Diego and I'll be there.  This is my favorite event of the year, a chance to find out what everyone will be watching, listening to, playing, and otherwise enjoying over the next few years.  As I always say, this is the Iowa caucuses of

posted 8:00:20am Jul. 21, 2014 | read full post »

Wish I Was Here
My intention was to review Zach Braff's new film without mentioning the controversy he stirred up in funding it via Kickstarter.  My view was that what mattered was the movie itself, and the kerfluffle over how it was all paid for was beside the point.  But it turns out that it is the point.  "Sc

posted 7:21:07pm Jul. 20, 2014 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.