Movie Mom

Movie Mom


Jennifer’s Body

posted by Nell Minow
B-
Lowest Recommended Age:Mature High Schooler
MPAA Rating:Rated R for sexuality, bloody violence, language and brief drug use
Profanity:Very strong language
Nudity/Sex:Explicit sexual references, some crude, and situations
Alcohol/Drugs:Drinking, drug use
Violence/Scariness:Intense and graphic violence, characters injured, killed, and eaten
Diversity Issues:None
Movie Release Date:September 18, 2009
DVD Release Date:December 29, 2009

“Jennifer’s Body” is not scary enough for horror and not knowing enough for commentary on horror.

“Hell is a teenage girl,” says Needy (Amanda Seyfried of “Mama Mia” and “Big Love”). And she should know. She is a teenage girl. And her Best Friend Forever Jennifer (made-for-Maxim hottie Megan Fox of the “Transformers” films) is both, quite literally. She may wear a BFF charm in recognition of friendship going back to the sandbox days, but she is more of a frenemy, one of those people who are in our life and have great powers of influence even though we are not sure why and we don’t like them very much. Jennifer tells the appropriately-nicknamed Needy (for Anita) to break a date with her boyfriend Chip (Johnny Simmons) and accompany Jennifer to the town’s only club/bar so they can watch an up-and-coming group called “Low Shoulder.” Needy says yes to Jennifer, no to Chip, and they are on their way.

Some nasty things happen, and Jennifer turns into a demon who preys on the bodies of helpless and terrified victims. (They have to be helpless and terrified; she’s something of a picky eater in that respect.) Needy is the only one who sees her for what she is, and as the remains begin to pile up and funerals clog everyone’s schedules, Needy has to figure out what to do. And it wouldn’t be a horror movie if it didn’t get personal.

When Diablo Cody (“Juno” and many opinionated but very cool and clever essays in Entertainment Weekly) takes on the horror genre, it is fair to expect some snappy honest-to-blog patter and if not obvious po-mo air quotes at least something a little meta. But it does not work as straight-on horror or as what has now become an established and rich little sub-genre of the snarky, self-aware horror film that delivers on two levels, like the “Scream” series, “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” or “Shaun of the Dead.”

It actually is not that much of a stretch between “straight” horror and meta-horror. Straight-on horror films deliver thrills with a combination of the predictable (woe to any teenager who has sex and if the camera zooms in close, there’s something terrible just out of frame) and the unpredictable (you know, the part where some one or some thing jumps out and splits some hapless victim down the middle). And they often have a sense of humor about themselves and their conventions, with serial killers Freddy Kruger (of “Nightmare on Elm Street”) and Chuckie (the demon doll) tossing off wisecracks and bad puns as they slaughter.

Cody has a few nice points to make here about the frenemy dynamic of some girl-girl relationships: the drama, the connection, the power plays, and the excitement. “Not high school evil; evil-evil” is an theme worth exploring, but it is hard to improve on “Buffy.” The idea of the indie band’s song “Through the Trees” being used at the candlelight vigils for the dead classmates is well-handled. And there are some cutesy winks at the audience, as when the indie band talks about getting on a movie soundtrack as a path to fame and fortune, as happened to the Moldy Peaches on the soundtrack of “Juno.” Casting everyone’s favorite boy next door Adam Brody as an “agent of Satan with a really awesome haircut” is fun. Director Karyn Kusama and cinematographer M. David Mullen find some striking compositions, though it is unfortunate that a pool scene recalls the much better teen vampire movie “Let the Right One In.” And what is the deal with that 80′s prom dress? Now that’s horror.



  • barbara

    18th sep is most waiting day for me as Jennifer’s body movie release. have you watch Jennifer’s body movie trailer. it was amazing to see Megan Fox’s actions. though it seems bit of lustful movie goes in very horrific way. i just love to watch her sexy blood sucking demon character.

  • blank dvd

    Accrding to me The movie could of been better, with a rated r movie you should of been able to see boobs and much more gore. That’s just my opinion,? my g/f loved it, but that’s just because, well she is she, lol

  • http://blog.beliefnet.com/moviemom/ Nell Minow

    Thanks, blank dvd — now we know who this movie’s target audience is!

  • clé usb

    Jennifer’s Body comes loaded with a pretty big freight of expectations. It’s nice to see Fox take a role that will ultimately be overshadowed by her co-star’s. The performances are great.

  • Your Name

    Please proof read, or have someone proof read your posts before you post them. This is so hard to read because the sentence structure is so bad and the grammar is wacked.

  • http://blog.beliefnet.com/moviemom/ Nell Minow

    Sorry to hear that! My readers are my best copy editors and I welcome corrections. If you let me know what you found hard to understand, I’ll do my best to correct it.

  • Charles

    I just watched this on DVD, Nell, and I have to say I found your review of the movie to be, well, overly generous! To me, it was wrong on so many levels. Too many loose threads that were never explained really ruined it for me (and I’m not refering to the main, central ‘loose thread’, which was exactly how Jennifer becomes the demon…it was okay to leave that up to the audience’s imagination). Why would a deer lick blood? What’s with the teacher with the missing hand? More importantly, the portrayal of the school’s teenage population as wanting nothing but sex was ridiculous and demeaning. That is not to say it needed to be total absent from the movie (i.e. as the tool that Jennifer uses to lure in her hormone-ravaged male victims), but some of the ‘soft-porn’ scenes were totally uncalled for and added nothing to the movie.
    I was blown away that both of these actresses, who have already found fame and fortune in the movies, had to stoop to such a low. What is with that, anyways?

  • http://blog.beliefnet.com/moviemom/ Nell Minow

    Hi, Charles! Great comment. I’m not sure we were so far apart. You can see from the first sentence that I do not consider it successful, but, like you, I did find some parts of it to be worthwhile. The plot holes and focus on teen sex, for better and worse, are slasher/horror film staples.

Previous Posts

The Memory Book -- This Saturday on the Hallmark Channel
A budding, young photographer stumbles upon an old photo album chronicling the ideal romance of a happy couple. Intrigued by their love and unable to find her own “true love,” she sets out to find the couple and figure out if true love really exists.  The film stars Meghan Ory (“Once Upon a T

posted 8:00:57am Jul. 24, 2014 | read full post »

Interview: Michael Rossato-Bennett of "Alive Inside"
Michael Rossato-Bennett agreed to spend one day filming Dan Cohen's remarkable music therapy work with people struggling with dementia. He ended up spending three years there and the result is "Alive Inside," an extraordinary documentary about the power of music to reach the human spirit, even when

posted 3:58:01pm Jul. 23, 2014 | read full post »

Movies' Greatest Mirror Scenes
Anne Billson has a great piece in The Telegraph on mirror scenes in movies, from the Marx brothers clowning in "Duck Soup" and the shootout in "The Lady from Shanghai" to Elizabeth Taylor scrawling on the mirror with lipstick in "Butterfield 8." [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKTT-sy0aLg

posted 8:00:51am Jul. 23, 2014 | read full post »

How Do Movies Show Time Passing?
Someone once said that movies are "pieces of time." A few take place in "real time." Alfred Hitchcock's experiment, "Rope," unfolds in just the time it takes us to watch it, all in what appears to be one seamless shot. But others take place over days, weeks, years, even generations. Slavko Vorkap

posted 8:00:40am Jul. 22, 2014 | read full post »

Boring TV Makes You Fat
A new study finds that boring television leads to mindless snacking and that leads to putting on pounds. So, watch programs that excite and engage you. Or, if the show is boring, turn off the television.

posted 8:00:05am Jul. 22, 2014 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.