Movie Mom

Movie Mom


Angels & Demons

posted by Nell Minow
B-
Lowest Recommended Age:High School
MPAA Rating:Rated PG-13 for sequences of violence, disturbing images and thematic material.
Profanity:Mild language
Nudity/Sex:None
Alcohol/Drugs:None
Violence/Scariness:Intense and graphic violence, torture, grisly images, guns, immolation
Diversity Issues:Diverse characters
Movie Release Date:May 15, 2009
DVD Release Date:November 24, 2009

Harvard professor of Symbology Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks) returns for another round of save the world heroics peppered with chases, kidnapping, murders, clues, codes, and ancient manuscripts, a beautiful and very erudite woman, murky motives, and a lot of historical, religious, and artistic arcana, all to the music of angelic choirs and crashing horns.While the book occurs before the blockbuster sequel, this movie begins after the events of The Da Vinci Code. Langdon is not the Catholic church’s favorite guy, given his heretical findings about the role of the real-life Mary Magdalene and the efforts of the church to suppress it. The Vatican has repeatedly denied his request for access to some of their historic documents. But when a crisis hits just as the cardinals have convened to select the new pope and the four leading candidates are kidnapped, with the clues pointing to a secret and possibly terrorist sect of Catholic rebels, the Vatican calls on Langdon to solve the mystery.To make things more complicated — and believe me, this gets very complicated — something else has been stolen. It is “antimatter” created by a supercollider that is intended to find “the God particle,” the piece of matter that will answer some important questions about how the universe began. And if they don’t get to it by 8 pm, there will be a very, very big boom.It isn’t just atoms that are colliding here. Author Dan Brown specializes in dark conspiracies of power in the name of faith. He posits this story as a conflict between religion and science going back hundreds of years. Once again, he takes intensely detailed research into church culture, history, and canons, even the intricacy of Vatican succession and chains of command plus Galileo, Raphael, sculpture, and architecture, and then he builds a fictional story around it, giving a standard chase and explosion saga some added weight, freight, and interest. Once again, however, the heavy exposition translates unevenly to the screen as the actors have to chew through paragraphs of detailed information as they are careening through the streets of Rome.Hanks (without the scholar’s mullet this time, thank goodness) is game throughout, always seeming skeptical without being cynical, though for a guy who says he is “anti-vandalism” he leaves a lot of destruction in his wake. Ewan McGregor seems a little lost as the assistant to the late pope whose position gives him a fragile claim to authority. And the lovely Israeli actress Ayelet Zurer is wasted in a role that calls on her to provide instant expertise in everything from astrophysics to Latin and pharmacology. Like its predecessor, this book and film have been controversial, challenging the church for the way it responds to challenges. For much of the story, Langdon is chasing after the Illuminati, for the purposes of this story a pro-science group “radicalized” by mistreatment hundreds of years ago and allegedly seeking the destruction of the church hierarchy by infiltration or violence. The bark of author Brown and director Ron Howard is provocative but the bite is thoroughly de-fanged and by its fictional overlay and its conclusion. Most of those who have what Langdon describes as the gift of faith will be satisfied. Parents should know that this film includes intense peril and very graphic images including a ripped-out eyeball. Violence includes guns, explosions, and torture, branding of humans, kidnapping, deaths by burning, dead bodies, grisly and disturbing visuals, and challenges to religious practice and belief.Family discussion: Read up on the history of the Illuminati and the past and present struggles between religion and science. How do you think they can be reconciled? What symbols do you find most meaningful and why? For more information about the controversy this book and movie have generated, see the comments of Beliefnet’s David Gibson, the Vatican, and Catholic Answers (some spoilers).If you like this, try: the book by Dan Brown and The Da Vinci Code



  • Alicia

    I read this book and enjoyed it more than “The Da Vinci Code.” However, what I enjoyed best was everything that dealt with antimatter, and the particle accelerator, and a really good speech on the relationship between science and religion delivered by one of the main characters. I have virtually forgotten the majority of the action of the book, all the racing around Rome, except for that. The action and conspiracy stuff seemed very forumulaic to me.

  • http://blog.beliefnet.com/moviemom/ Nell Minow

    I agree Alicia; I thought the movie was weak because it focused on the chases instead of the ideas.

  • Dan Berger

    “intensely detailed research into church culture, history, and canons, even the intricacy of Vatican succession and chains of command plus Galileo, Raphael, sculpture, and architecture” — What?
    Dan Brown’s “research” consisted of reading a couple of conspiracy books. See Steve Greydanus’ fact-checking.
    Ridiculousness of the historical premises doesn’t stop a movie from being engaging and fun; cases in point are National Treasure and the Indiana Jones flicks. But let’s not pretend there’s any actual fact in the movie.

  • http://blog.beliefnet.com/moviemom/ Nell Minow

    Thanks, Dan! I didn’t suggest that the movie was factual. As you will see if you listen to the radio interview I linked to, quite the contrary. And note that I linked in my review to commentary and critique. But Brown does do a great deal of research, which is reflected in his books, even as he picks and chooses what facts to keep and what facts to amend in the name of fiction.

  • http://blog.spot411.com/angels-or-demons/ SpotJack

    Hello Nell, I enjoyed the review thanks! I also wanted to stop by and invite you and your readers to watch A&D with us on Friday. If can I can provide any more information or if you have questions please give me a shout. Thanks again for the review as this will be a great resource for our community as well.

Previous Posts

Great Cinematographers on Instagram
Indiewire has a gorgeous array of Instagram feeds from Hollywood cinematographers. Be sure to talke a look so you can follow them.

posted 8:00:27am Sep. 19, 2014 | read full post »

De-fictionalizing Products in Movies and Television: Life Imitating Art
Fast Company has an article about Omni Consumer Products, a "de-fictionalizing" company that looks for products in movies and television that do not really exist and makes them available. As the sole proprietor of Omni Consumer Products, [Pete] Hottelet is constantly scanning the pop culture z

posted 8:00:17am Sep. 19, 2014 | read full post »

Tusk
You can make a good movie about slackers, for example "Slackers," from Richard Linklater and "Clerks" from Kevin Smith. But you can't make a good movie by a slacker, and Smith does not seem wi

posted 5:59:40pm Sep. 18, 2014 | read full post »

This is Where I Leave You
A toddler carries his little potty out in front of the house so he can try out his new-found skill in public. Twice. Plus another time when the contents of the potty are first displayed for the

posted 5:59:39pm Sep. 18, 2014 | read full post »

The Maze Runner
Yes, it's another dystopic YA trilogy (actually, there's a fourth volume, a prequel), and yes, only a teenager with fabulous cheekbones can save the day. But "The Maze Runner" is not a lesser repeat. It is a worthy addition to the genre, an absorbing drama with surprising turns and even more surpris

posted 5:59:23pm Sep. 18, 2014 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.