Movie Mom

Movie Mom

Yes Man

posted by Nell Minow
Lowest Recommended Age:High School
MPAA Rating:Rated PG-13 for crude sexual humor, language and brief nudity
Profanity:Some strong language, one f-word
Nudity/Sex:Brief comic nudity, bare tushes, vulgar sexual references
Alcohol/Drugs:Drinking, characters get drunk, liquor used to deal with stress and to show good spirits
Violence/Scariness:Comic violence, bar fight, car crash, suicide attempt
Diversity Issues:None
Movie Release Date:December 19, 2008
DVD Release Date:April 7, 2009

Carrey-ologists will enjoy poring over the semiotics of “Yes Man,” in one sense a very slight variation of one of Jim Carrey’s biggest hits, 1997’s Liar Liar. In both films, he plays a divorced professional man who has in essence checked out emotionally and spiritually. In the first he simply says whatever will get him what he wants, even if it is not true. He does the same here, except that it’s all the same lie: “I’m busy.” Like Melville’s famous character Bartleby he responds to all offers and invitations, one way or another, “I prefer not to.” Just as in a wish in “Liar Liar” turns him into a man who can only tell the truth, in this film a “no” character commits to saying “yes” to everything, from spam invitations to try out to a very big guy in a bar asking him if he wants to step outside for a fight.
Both films have wives who with new significant others who make the Carrey character feel diminished, and in both a large part of the screen time and all of the humor comes from Carrey’s squirming through the consequences of his reversal and the way he must deal with the larger consequences of his previous bad behavior. As always, Carrey makes some funny faces and uses his rubbery limbs to good comic effect.
But with nearly a decade between the two films, Carrey and Carl, his character, bring a more poignant sense of longing and lost chances. It is significant that this film does not require any hocus-pocus to get the story started. It just establishes that Carrey is a no-guy, feeling sorry for himself and turning down just about everything. Fortunately, he is a bank loan officer, so this tendency has professional benefits. But in his personal life, he says no to his friends and would-be friends (his nerdy boss) to stay home and watch DVDs and feel sorry for himself.
And then one day an old friend suggests that he go to a motivational seminar led by a man named Terrence (played by Terence Stamp, no idea why the character name has two r’s and the actor has just one) who persuades him to start saying “yes.” To everything. That means giving a ride to a homeless guy and going to his boss’s Harry Potter party, taking Korean lessons, and learning to fly. Not to mention approving a lot of loans. It seems to him that there is a pattern because each of those yeses leads to something unexpected and wonderful, the best of all being a free-spirited girl named Alison (Zooey Deschanel), a natural yes-er. Just a hop skip and a jump to the getting-to-know-you montage, the second act complication, and a happily-yessing-ever-after conclusion with a little gratuitous nudity.
The characters around Carl and Alison don’t add much and her character does not have much depth, but the Carrey and Deschanel have an easy chemistry that gives the film a strong center. And the film nicely hints at the interconnection of all things and the way the messages we send out to the universe — whether yes or no — reverberate and return to us.

Parents should know that this film has some strong language (one f-word), comic violence including car crash, bar fight, and suicide attempt, drinking and drunkenness, some kissing and very vulgar sexual references (it is supposed to be funny that an elderly woman insists on having oral sex with the character) with one comic but crude sexual situation, and brief comic nudity (bare tushes).
Family discussion: Is there a time when you should have said “yes” instead of “no?”
If you like this, try: the non-fiction book that inspired it by Danny Wallace and Jim Carrey’s movie Liar Liar.

  • Mike

    The trailer showed way too many of the funny parts, although I do like Jim Carrey’s ringtone at the beginning of the movie. To me, that was the biggest problem. I wanted to laugh more, but I saw everything coming because I had seen it already.

  • Nell Minow

    I agreee, Mike. I ended up liking other things in the movie more than I liked the jokes and gags.

  • Taylr

    I am interested in this movie because I really like Jim Carrey, but I don’t like watching movies with nudity. Do you see women and men naked?

  • Nell Minow

    There is very brief comic nudity (bare tushes of men and women) at the end of the movie. There is also a vulgar comic sexual situation involving an older woman but without any nudity. If you see the movie, let me know what you think!

  • John Paton

    Considering the price of movies these days and the preciousness of our time, my wife and I both saw this film as a big waste. The satire on personal transformation was apt, but not funny. The grain of truth in unconditional yes-saying could be thought-provoking, but the whole film was soiled by casual foul language, casual sex. (I actually like sex and nudity in many films, but I want it to be beautiful and loving, not just convenient and opportunistic.) I was shocked to see parents with little children walking out of the theater at the end of the movie; I hope the kids had slept through it.
    I guess we laughed about four times in two hours, not what I expect from a Jim Carrey film.

  • Nell Minow

    Agreed, John — thanks for writing. Your description applies to most PG-13 comedies these days, I am sorry to say. Thanks a lot for a comment that will be very helpful to people who are considering seeing this film.

  • Jazz

    Is the nudity strong? any frontal views or is the nudity just of the behind…

  • Nell Minow

    As noted in the review, there is brief comic nudity — bare tushes only.

  • Tori

    The old woman having oral sex with Jim Carrey made me want to throw up. This movie is a waste of time. Like Ben Stiller, Jim Carrey has become someone I distrust in a movie. I need someone who has seen the film tell me if I should spend time or money on it.

  • Nell Minow

    Thanks, Tori. That was the “comic but crude” sex scene I referred to. As you can see in the review, I made it clear that the film had very vulgar humor, so in the future if you check the advisories in my reviews — and in general stay away from PG-13 comedies — you should be spared this kind of unpleasantness.

Previous Posts

Trailer: Adam Sandler and Peter Dinklage in "Pixels," a Comedy About the Attack of the Aliens Modeled on Classic Video Games
[iframe width="560" height="315" src="" frameborder="0"]

posted 8:00:58am Mar. 28, 2015 | read full post »

Actress Speaks Up Against Absurd Hollywood Casting Conventions
Cheers to the understandably anonymous "Miss L," an actress in Hollywood, for her Tumblr posting real-life casting information that shows how limited and misogynistic Hollywood casting is.  Casting Call Woe shows actual casting call notices, most of which require actresses to be hot (no matter what

posted 3:57:54pm Mar. 27, 2015 | read full post »

Trailer: Paper Towns with Nat Wolff
[iframe width="560" height="315" src="" frameborder="0"]

posted 8:00:09am Mar. 27, 2015 | read full post »

The Wrecking Crew
Maybe you like Frank Sinatra and your friend likes the Mamas and Papas. Maybe you've argued about who is better, the Beach Boys or Simon and Garfunkel, or maybe you prefer Elvis. Each of those monumen

posted 9:48:37pm Mar. 26, 2015 | read full post »

"Home" is a cute and colorful movie about an alien invasion with an important safety tip concerning one of the most destructive forces in the universe, something devastating to every known life form.

posted 5:59:44pm Mar. 26, 2015 | read full post »

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.