Advertisement

Movie Mom

Movie Mom

Vantage Point

posted by Nell Minow
C
Lowest Recommended Age:High School
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for sequences of intense violence and action, some disturbing images and brief strong language.
Profanity:Brief strong language
Nudity/Sex:None
Alcohol/Drugs:None
Violence/Scariness:Intense and graphic violence, including terrorism, child in peril, many characters injured and killed
Diversity Issues:Diverse characters
Movie Release Date:February 22, 2008
DVD Release Date:July 1, 2008
C
Lowest Recommended Age: High School
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for sequences of intense violence and action, some disturbing images and brief strong language.
Profanity: Brief strong language
Nudity/Sex: None
Alcohol/Drugs: None
Violence/Scariness: Intense and graphic violence, including terrorism, child in peril, many characters injured and killed
Diversity Issues: Diverse characters
Movie Release Date: February 22, 2008
DVD Release Date: July 1, 2008

vantage%20point.jpgA gimmicky thriller without much of a gimmick or many thrills, “Vantage Point” suffers, too, from being out of synch with its time. Its premise may be current — an assassination attempt at an anti-terrorism summit — but its tone is off. A good thriller — or even a good episode of “Law and Order” — uncovers our underlying fears, recognizes that they are closely tied to curiosity, and pushes them to the point of pleasurable fear and cathartic release. This film clumsily builds on the headlines with a simplistic story that, even told in mosaic bits and pieces is obvious and clunky, with big logical gaps. It would be more intriguing to see the same story told several times from different perspectives, each one adding another layer of information, if the underlying story was worthwhile. But this story of a terrorist attack at an anti-terrorism summit, is too thin to withstand the repetition. Instead of making it deeper and more complex, the retellings get tiresome and overblown.

Advertisement


We begin in the control room of a television network, with Sigourney Weaver as a tough, cynical news producer, telling on-site correspondent Angie Jones (Zoe Saldana) to keep her report crisp and ignore the subtleties and details — like the anti-American demonstrators. The President is in Spain, making a speech in honor of a new anti-terrorism agreement. And then there is a shooting and an explosion. Stop. Rewind. And we see the same events from the point of view of another character.
This time it is Dennis Quaid as Thomas Barnes, a Secret Service agent who has just returned to duty after he was shot protecting the President from an assassination attempt. He is jumpy, perhaps compromised, unsure of his judgment. There are so many people and it is hard to tell if any one of them is reaching into his pocket for a gun or just a cell phone. Shooting. Explosion. Rewind.
We go back and forth as Barnes does, seeing the events over and over through the footage captured by the network and the video camera owned by an American tourist (Forrest Whitaker) and from the points of view of a range of characters including a local cop with concerns about his girlfriend’s loyalty and the President himself, insulated by security but trying to maintain control.
The problem is that all that unraveling is not worth the pay-off, a not-very-surprising surprise and a not-very-exciting car chase. Because of the fractionated story-telling, we don’t spend enough time with any character to feel invested. It is hard to feel good about those who survive in light of the numbers of those who do not. And it is manipulative to place a child in jeopardy just to increase the tension. From my vantage point as an audience member, this movie is not worth watching.
Parents should know that this film has intense and graphic violence, including acts of terrorism, suicide bombing, assassination attempts, adults and a child in peril, and many characters injured and killed. Characters use brief strong language.
Families who see this movie should talk about how the style of story-telling helps — or does not help — to maintain the tension. How do we find the right balance between security for everyone and privacy of individuals?
Families who enjoy this movie will also enjoy Air Force One, The Parallax View, and In the Line of Fire.

  • david grow

    this is a great the rateing is bad but the moive has nothig bad in it.I think this moive should be for 5-9 grade.

  • Nell Minow

    Thanks for writing, David, but I disagree with you about your recommended ages. The movie has extreme and graphic violence, including terrorism and attempted assassination. Many characters are murdered. I do not think it is appropriate for kids.

  • Dena

    I have to disagree with you, Nell. We just saw it with our 12-year old twin boys and the whole family really enjoyed the premise and seeing the different “vantage point.” We did find the ending surprising and the car chase exciting. I do agree that an awful lot of people died, but it that what’s heartbreaking about terrorism?

  • Nell Minow

    Thanks for writing, Dana! I am always glad when someone sees more in a movie than I do and I am glad you and your boys enjoyed it.

  • Celeste Robbins

    Hello, I’m Celeste, I am twelve and three quarters and I want to see this movie. If it is inappropriate, I will march straight out of the theater, and want my money back. This may happen, as your articles on movies have been useful to my many a time.

  • Nell Minow

    Hi, Celeste! There is some very intense and graphic violence in the film, and you sound like you have a good sense of what you can handle and — even more important — what to do if you decide it is not right for you. If you go to the movie, let me know what you think. And thanks for the kind words — you made my day!

  • Valerie

    Hi Movie Mom,
    I totally agree with your assessment of the film. There was mild groaning and laughter in the audience with each start of the clock. And the body count was ridiculous–definitely not for children. The premise is intriguing, but unfortunately, the film didn’t work for me.

  • autumn

    Yes, the downfall of the movie is the repetitive rewind effect but it’s point is to make the film simple to understand and for the audience to think and put the pieces together and seeing the hearts of the characters. I think this movie was good and thought provoking but yet suspenceful and entertaining.

Previous Posts

Interview: Matt Mamula of Celebrity Impersonator Documentary "Just About Famous"
Matt Mamula co-directed "Just About Famous," the very entertaining new documentary about celebrity impersonators. He generously took time to talk to me about the unexpected opportunities that open up when someone looks like someone who becomes ...

posted 3:59:51pm Apr. 26, 2015 | read full post »

Interview: Barak Goodman of "Cancer: The Emperor of All Maladies"
Director Barak Goodman talked to me about his superb series for PBS, Cancer: The Emperor of All Maladies, now available on DVD. The series is produced ...

posted 3:55:04pm Apr. 26, 2015 | read full post »

Creativity Conference 2015: Nancy Pelosi, Snoopy, and Drones with GoPros
I had so much fun at last year's Creativity Conference that I could not imagine how they could top it this year, but they succeeded. This is ...

posted 3:07:48pm Apr. 26, 2015 | read full post »

Trailer: The Little Prince
The beloved book The Little Prince has been gorgeously animated, with voices including Jeff Bridges, James Franco, and Rachel McAdams.  I love this trailer. [iframe frameborder="0" width="480" height="270" ...

posted 8:00:24am Apr. 26, 2015 | read full post »

Trailer: Samuel L. Jackson is the President in "Big Game"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKThy0cipVA ...

posted 8:00:34am Apr. 25, 2015 | read full post »

Advertisement


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.