Movie Mom

Movie Mom


Vantage Point

posted by Nell Minow
C
Lowest Recommended Age:High School
MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for sequences of intense violence and action, some disturbing images and brief strong language.
Profanity:Brief strong language
Nudity/Sex:None
Alcohol/Drugs:None
Violence/Scariness:Intense and graphic violence, including terrorism, child in peril, many characters injured and killed
Diversity Issues:Diverse characters
Movie Release Date:February 22, 2008
DVD Release Date:July 1, 2008

vantage%20point.jpgA gimmicky thriller without much of a gimmick or many thrills, “Vantage Point” suffers, too, from being out of synch with its time. Its premise may be current — an assassination attempt at an anti-terrorism summit — but its tone is off. A good thriller — or even a good episode of “Law and Order” — uncovers our underlying fears, recognizes that they are closely tied to curiosity, and pushes them to the point of pleasurable fear and cathartic release. This film clumsily builds on the headlines with a simplistic story that, even told in mosaic bits and pieces is obvious and clunky, with big logical gaps. It would be more intriguing to see the same story told several times from different perspectives, each one adding another layer of information, if the underlying story was worthwhile. But this story of a terrorist attack at an anti-terrorism summit, is too thin to withstand the repetition. Instead of making it deeper and more complex, the retellings get tiresome and overblown.


We begin in the control room of a television network, with Sigourney Weaver as a tough, cynical news producer, telling on-site correspondent Angie Jones (Zoe Saldana) to keep her report crisp and ignore the subtleties and details — like the anti-American demonstrators. The President is in Spain, making a speech in honor of a new anti-terrorism agreement. And then there is a shooting and an explosion. Stop. Rewind. And we see the same events from the point of view of another character.
This time it is Dennis Quaid as Thomas Barnes, a Secret Service agent who has just returned to duty after he was shot protecting the President from an assassination attempt. He is jumpy, perhaps compromised, unsure of his judgment. There are so many people and it is hard to tell if any one of them is reaching into his pocket for a gun or just a cell phone. Shooting. Explosion. Rewind.
We go back and forth as Barnes does, seeing the events over and over through the footage captured by the network and the video camera owned by an American tourist (Forrest Whitaker) and from the points of view of a range of characters including a local cop with concerns about his girlfriend’s loyalty and the President himself, insulated by security but trying to maintain control.
The problem is that all that unraveling is not worth the pay-off, a not-very-surprising surprise and a not-very-exciting car chase. Because of the fractionated story-telling, we don’t spend enough time with any character to feel invested. It is hard to feel good about those who survive in light of the numbers of those who do not. And it is manipulative to place a child in jeopardy just to increase the tension. From my vantage point as an audience member, this movie is not worth watching.
Parents should know that this film has intense and graphic violence, including acts of terrorism, suicide bombing, assassination attempts, adults and a child in peril, and many characters injured and killed. Characters use brief strong language.
Families who see this movie should talk about how the style of story-telling helps — or does not help — to maintain the tension. How do we find the right balance between security for everyone and privacy of individuals?
Families who enjoy this movie will also enjoy Air Force One, The Parallax View, and In the Line of Fire.



  • david grow

    this is a great the rateing is bad but the moive has nothig bad in it.I think this moive should be for 5-9 grade.

  • Nell Minow

    Thanks for writing, David, but I disagree with you about your recommended ages. The movie has extreme and graphic violence, including terrorism and attempted assassination. Many characters are murdered. I do not think it is appropriate for kids.

  • Dena

    I have to disagree with you, Nell. We just saw it with our 12-year old twin boys and the whole family really enjoyed the premise and seeing the different “vantage point.” We did find the ending surprising and the car chase exciting. I do agree that an awful lot of people died, but it that what’s heartbreaking about terrorism?

  • Nell Minow

    Thanks for writing, Dana! I am always glad when someone sees more in a movie than I do and I am glad you and your boys enjoyed it.

  • Celeste Robbins

    Hello, I’m Celeste, I am twelve and three quarters and I want to see this movie. If it is inappropriate, I will march straight out of the theater, and want my money back. This may happen, as your articles on movies have been useful to my many a time.

  • Nell Minow

    Hi, Celeste! There is some very intense and graphic violence in the film, and you sound like you have a good sense of what you can handle and — even more important — what to do if you decide it is not right for you. If you go to the movie, let me know what you think. And thanks for the kind words — you made my day!

  • Valerie

    Hi Movie Mom,
    I totally agree with your assessment of the film. There was mild groaning and laughter in the audience with each start of the clock. And the body count was ridiculous–definitely not for children. The premise is intriguing, but unfortunately, the film didn’t work for me.

  • autumn

    Yes, the downfall of the movie is the repetitive rewind effect but it’s point is to make the film simple to understand and for the audience to think and put the pieces together and seeing the hearts of the characters. I think this movie was good and thought provoking but yet suspenceful and entertaining.

Previous Posts

The Woman in Gold
The very title is a form of theft. When Gustav Klimt painted the portrait that gives this film its name, he called it "Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer." She was a warm, vibrant young woman

posted 5:58:01pm Mar. 31, 2015 | read full post »

Interview: The Woman in Gold's Simon Curtis and E. Randol Schoenberg
Director Simon Curtis told me, "My last film was My Week with Marilyn, and this one is my century with Maria."  He is referring to "The Woman in Gold," with Helen Mirren as Maria Altmann, who brought a lawsuit to get back the portrait of her aunt Adele, painted by Gustav Klimt, which had been stole

posted 3:37:47pm Mar. 31, 2015 | read full post »

Faith-Based Movie Picks -- The Today Show
In honor of Easter and Passover, the Today Show has some good suggestions for faith-based movies, from the very serious and respectful to the light-hearted.

posted 3:13:29pm Mar. 31, 2015 | read full post »

Another "Star is Born" Movie? Possibly, with Bradley Cooper as Director and Beyonce to Star!
A movie that's already been done three times (at least) may just get yet another remake if the rumors are true that Bradley Cooper will direct and Beyoncé will appear in "A Star is Born."  The original 1937 version, said to be inspired by (among others) the marriage of aging vaudeville star Al Jol

posted 3:54:02pm Mar. 30, 2015 | read full post »

Exclusive Clip and Contest: What Would Jesus Do -- The Journey Continues
We are honored to present an exclusive clip from "WWJD (What Would Jesus Do): The Journey Continues," inspired by the best-selling classic book In His Steps. WWJD: The Journey Continues is availab

posted 3:40:29pm Mar. 30, 2015 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.