Movie Mom

Movie Mom


Lions for Lambs

posted by Nell Minow
C
Lowest Recommended Age:High School
MPAA Rating:MPAA Rating: R for some war violence and language
Profanity:Some strong language
Nudity/Sex:None
Alcohol/Drugs:None
Violence/Scariness:Brief graphic battle violence
Diversity Issues:A strength of the movie is strong, loyal relationships between diverse characters
Movie Release Date:November 9, 2007

It is more op-ed than movie. “Lions for Lambs” is a well-meaning attempt to encapsulate and move forward one segment of our current political debates. But it is mostly speeches, not stories.
Lions%20for%20Lambs.jpg


In an effort to impose some narrative and characters onto a debate about politics and culture, there are three different settings. At the same time, a journalist interviews a Senator about a new military strategy in Afghanistan, a professor speaks to a student who seems disengaged, and two soldiers in Afghanistan who are a part of the new initiative.
The journalist (Meryl Streep) is skeptical. She points out that the US has been wrong many times since 9/11. Our military strategy has failed. The Senator (Tom Cruise) acknowledges the mistakes but says that is why the American people should believe him now. We have learned from our mistakes. This time, he insists, we know what we are doing.
The Senator tells the journalist that the media has its share of the blame. It failed to play its essential role — its critical role, in both senses of the word. The press was afraid of being considered disloyal, or lazy, or worried about making money. And so it did not ask hard questions, it did not hold the politicians accountable, and it buried the hard truth under stories about celebrities.
The professor (director Robert Redford) tells the student (Andrew Garfield) he is too bright to give up on the idea of making a difference, that he no longer has the option to have a nice life and let other people do the dirty work of making the hard decisions.
But the professor had some other students who took his words about becoming involved and did exactly what he did not want them to do; they enlisted.
In addition to the arguments about the particulars of politics and national security, the movie is ambitious enough to take on meta issues of action vs. inaction as its characters, like Hamlet, wonder “whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And by opposing end them.” But Hamlet comes to a conclusion. The talking characters her never transcend that sense of constriction, uncertainty, and inertia.
This is the first movie to come out of the revitalized United Artists studio since Tom Cruise and his producing partner Paula Wagner took over. But the movie is anything but vital. It is inert. Cruise as producer does not seem to have a clear idea of what kind of movie he is trying to create. And Cruise as actor does not seem to have a clear idea of the character he is trying to create; at times he seems to be doing a tribute to — or is it a parody of? — Jack Nicholson’s performance opposite him in “A Few Good Men.” It’s as though he is channeling Nicholson’s comments: “You have the luxury of not knowing what I know…my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives.” If only this movie had a single line as vivid.
It is absurd to think that a movie can or should provide answers in a situation as complicated as this one. But it is fair to expect insights. And it is fair to insist on characters who are more than plastic tokens for some sort of board game, and this film’s characters never really come to life. More important, it has the inherent drawback to any attack on ideologues — its reliance on rationality and discourse comes across as tepid and uncertain. Most important, it abandons its temperate tone to become shrill near the end with an over-the-top Hollywood conclusion for one of the pairs and a cheap shot at a triple-ethnic-named newscaster who prattles about a pop star’s divorce while the headlines of the serious stories are on a crawl at the bottom of the screen next to the sports scores and stock ticker. The call for reason is undermined by the very tactics the movie decries.
Parents should know that this movie includes brief scenes of graphic battle violence, with characters injured and killed. There is also some strong language.
Families who see this movie should talk about what the administration and the current contenders for the Presidential nomination are proposing for Afghanistan and Iraq. What have been our greatest successes and failures? What are the strongest and weakest points made by the Senator, the journalist, the professor, and the student?
Families who appreciate this movie will also appreciate documentaries like Control Room, No End in Sight, and The War Tapes.



Previous Posts

The Memory Book -- This Saturday on the Hallmark Channel
A budding, young photographer stumbles upon an old photo album chronicling the ideal romance of a happy couple. Intrigued by their love and unable to find her own “true love,” she sets out to find the couple and figure out if true love really exists.  The film stars Meghan Ory (“Once Upon a T

posted 8:00:57am Jul. 24, 2014 | read full post »

Interview: Michael Rossato-Bennett of "Alive Inside"
Michael Rossato-Bennett agreed to spend one day filming Dan Cohen's remarkable music therapy work with people struggling with dementia. He ended up spending three years there and the result is "Alive Inside," an extraordinary documentary about the power of music to reach the human spirit, even when

posted 3:58:01pm Jul. 23, 2014 | read full post »

Movies' Greatest Mirror Scenes
Anne Billson has a great piece in The Telegraph on mirror scenes in movies, from the Marx brothers clowning in "Duck Soup" and the shootout in "The Lady from Shanghai" to Elizabeth Taylor scrawling on the mirror with lipstick in "Butterfield 8." [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKTT-sy0aLg

posted 8:00:51am Jul. 23, 2014 | read full post »

How Do Movies Show Time Passing?
Someone once said that movies are "pieces of time." A few take place in "real time." Alfred Hitchcock's experiment, "Rope," unfolds in just the time it takes us to watch it, all in what appears to be one seamless shot. But others take place over days, weeks, years, even generations. Slavko Vorkap

posted 8:00:40am Jul. 22, 2014 | read full post »

Boring TV Makes You Fat
A new study finds that boring television leads to mindless snacking and that leads to putting on pounds. So, watch programs that excite and engage you. Or, if the show is boring, turn off the television.

posted 8:00:05am Jul. 22, 2014 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.