Mormon Inquiry

Mormon Inquiry


Race and apology: the example of BJU

posted by Dave Banack

According to a recent AP story, Bob Jones University has issued a statement apologizing for its past race policies. Before 1971 it did not admit black students and there was a school policy against interracial dating until 2000. The full document, “Statement About Race at Bob Jones University,” makes interesting reading. Hard to decide whether to cringe or applaud.

On the applause side, BJU deserves credit for updating its policies and, in this statement, actually apologizing for its prior policies.

BJU’s history has been chiefly characterized by striving to achieve those goals; but like any human institution, we have failures as well. For almost two centuries American Christianity, including BJU in its early stages, was characterized by the segregationist ethos of American culture. Consequently, for far too long, we allowed institutional policies regarding race to be shaped more directly by that ethos than by the principles and precepts of the Scriptures. We conformed to the culture rather than provide a clear Christian counterpoint to it.

In so doing, we failed to accurately represent the Lord and to fulfill the commandment to love others as ourselves. For these failures we are profoundly sorry. Though no known antagonism toward minorities or expressions of racism on a personal level have ever been tolerated on our campus, we allowed institutional policies to remain in place that were racially hurtful.

The cringing comes for an LDS reader familiar with the history of racial policies in the LDS Church. The policy denying the LDS priesthood to males of African descent was reversed in 1978 and added to the LDS scriptures as Official Declaration — 2 in the Doctrine and Covenants. It is a celebratory document, and perhaps it should be so. But the continuing failure to publish any sort of apology for prior LDS racial policies still grates on some people. The implicit claim — that there was really nothing wrong with the prior LDS race policy — unfortunately supports the persistence of unfounded and offensive racial folk doctrine among the general membership of the LDS Church. It seems like the action of BJU in publicly admitting the error of its prior policy is an example of the right way to fully repudiate such a policy.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(5)
post a comment
Mike Parker

posted November 25, 2008 at 7:05 pm


If not an apology, then at least an official repudiation of the “blacks are descendants of Cain” folklore.



report abuse
 

Todd Wood

posted November 25, 2008 at 11:28 pm


thanks



report abuse
 

Owen

posted November 26, 2008 at 9:55 am


While I, like pretty well everyone I know, is at some level uneasy with this topic and wishes the church could have just been on the side of abolition and civil rights all along, I wonder if this line of reasoning does not also mean the church should be apologizing for the Aaronic priesthood being limited to Levites for a long period of time. There are any number of inscrutable and from some perspective distasteful things the Lord has done over time–whether this most recent limitation on the priesthood was initiated by the Lord or simply tolerated, as He often seems to tolerate human stupidity until we become worthy to receive a higher law, I don’t know. Although the veracity of the textual claims of divine approval for plenty of the wacky stuff in the OT is easy to question, the divine execution of Ananias and Sapphira tells me that this is a God perfectly capable of being behind the limitation on the priesthood in this dispensation.



report abuse
 

Doc

posted November 26, 2008 at 1:32 pm


Owen,
Perhaps you are right that God could be behind the policy, I still need a whole lot more evidence than the fact Brigham Young introduced it in some nebulous and a doctrinally suspect manner to convince me personally that God MUST be behind it.



report abuse
 

Seth R.

posted November 27, 2008 at 2:47 pm


I remember reading that the folklore doctrines on the “Mark of Cain” and the “Curse of Ham” that had some vogue in the LDS Church actually originated with Protestants.
I’m almost certain that Southern Baptist preachers used the doctrines to counter abolitionist arguments during the Civil Was period, and I’m pretty sure that it was used to prop up segregation as well.
Anyone have some source material on this?



report abuse
 



Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Mormon Inquiry. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Most Recent Mormon Story on Beliefnet Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!  

posted 2:21:45pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

The meanings of Zion
This is the third post on Richard L. Bushman's Mormonism: A Very Short Introduction (OUP, 2008). [See Part 1 and Part 2.] In Chapter Three, Bushman reviews the several meanings of the term "Zion" in LDS doctrine and thinking. The Mormon sense of Zion has no real parallels in Protestant though

posted 11:00:37pm Jul. 29, 2009 | read full post »

A statistical portrait of Mormons
The Pew Forum recently issued a detailed summary of survey information about Mormons gathered as part of a much larger survey of religious life in the United States. It is a very readable summary, noting that Mormons comprise 1.7% of adults in the US; 35% of Mormon adults live in Utah and 13% live i

posted 12:33:08pm Jul. 29, 2009 | read full post »

July 24th: Pioneer Day in Utah
July 24th is a state holiday in Utah, designated Pioneer Day. It commemorates the entry of the first wagon train of Mormons into the Salt Lake Valley in the summer of 1847. They came down Emigration Canyon, somewhat north of the present I-80 corridor which comes down Parley's Canyon. Brigham Young w

posted 5:38:50pm Jul. 23, 2009 | read full post »

Finding heretics in strange places
A very interesting post at Mormon Matters, reviewing a 1989 book titled "Will the Real Heretics Please Stand Up?" The book was written by an attorney who grew up a Jehovah's Witness, then became an Evangelical Christian. That lasted until he conducted a thorough reading the original writings of the

posted 6:27:09pm Jul. 22, 2009 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.