Mark D. Roberts

Mark D. Roberts


Warren Prays, Not in Jesusâ?? Name, but in Jesusâ?? Names

posted by Mark D. Roberts

Part 7 of series: Rick Warren, the Obama Inauguration, and Praying in Jesus’ Name
Permalink for this post / Permalink for this series
Ya gotta hand it to Rick Warren. He always seems to have a surprise or two up his sleeve. Iâ??ve been following his ministry for almost twenty years, most of which I served as a pastor in a church fourteen miles away from Warrenâ??s Saddleback Church, and Iâ??ve always been impressed with Warrenâ??s ability to be unpredictable. Sure, in some ways he is utterly predictable. Chances are pretty good that youâ??ll hear him use the phrase â??purpose-drivenâ? for example (though not in his prayer!). But Warren is a creative and innovative leader, who canâ??t be put neatly into a box.
Iâ??ll bet almost nobody in the whole world predicted that Warren would pray not only in the name of Jesus, but â??in the name of the one who changed my life, Yeshua, Isa, Jesus (hay-SOOS), Jesus.â? (You can find the AP text of the prayer here. But they got the placement of (hay-SOOS) wrong. For a video of the prayer, check this link, or click the image to the right.)
Warren did not say â??we pray in the name of Jesus,â? but “I pray.” This was right on target. Many who prayed along with him did not actually pray in the name (authority) of Jesus, and would not have been able to join Warren in saying so. It was interesting to me that Warren made his use of Jesus even more personal, saying, â??I humbly ask this in the name of the one who changed my life, Yeshua, Isa, Jesus [Spanish pronunciation], Jesus . . . .â? I like this, because it makes clear why Warren used the name(s) of Jesus. For him, itâ??s a matter of deep personal faith.
Of course the biggest surprise was the way Warren referred to Jesus, not just as â??Jesusâ? in English, but as â??Yeshuaâ? (Aramaic, what Jesus was actually called), Isa (what Muslims and Hindus call Jesus), Jesus (hay-SOOS) in Spanish, and Jesus. Iâ??d love to know exactly what Warren was intending here. Was he wanting to say: â??Jesus changed my life, but heâ??s not just for me, but for everybodyâ?? Or was he trying hard to include the major religious traditions? If so, why did he use Spanish? Was this an effort to be inclusive, even as Warren was praying in an exclusively Christian manner? Or . . . ?
What I like about Warrenâ??s four-fold reference to Jesus is its boldness. If youâ??re going to pray using Jesusâ?? name, might as well just say it. Iâ??ve heard preachers in civic settings say things that try to get around the problem, like, â??I pray in the name of the teacher from Nazareth,â? but this always impressed me as rather wimpy. Besides, do you actually think those who would be put off by a prayer that mentions Jesus would somehow be fine with a clever circumlocution? Not!
I thought the rest of Warrenâ??s prayer was solid. His use of biblical themes and theology was excellent. His language was reconciling rather than divisive. Contrast what Warren said with the invocation given a couple of days earlier by the Episcopal Bishop, Rev. Gene Robinson, and youâ??ll see what I mean. I found Warrenâ??s specific prayers for President Obama and his family to be touching, though I donâ??t understand his peculiar way of saying the names of the Presidentâ??s daughters. Perhaps this is a personal matter.
Iâ??ve heard several commentators criticize Warren for being too casual, or for looking awkward in such a setting as a presidential inauguration. I, on the contrary, appreciate his willingness to be himself. Praying in front of a nation, Warren didnâ??t sound any different from when he prays in front of his own church family.
Rick Warren may or may not be â??the next Billy Graham,â? whatever that means. But I believe he offered a sincere, thoughtful, truthful prayer today, one that reflected well on the evangelical Christian community, even as it articulated the prayers of the nation. In the days ahead, Iâ??m going to analyze some similar prayers, including the one by Bishop Robinson, as well as several inaugural prayers by Billy Graham. I find the contrasts to be fascinating.
But before I get to this analysis, I want to talk about another kind of prayer related to President Obama. Stay tuned . . . .



Advertisement
Comments read comments(16)
post a comment
Neil

posted January 21, 2009 at 3:09 am


Good analysis. I’m a fence-sitter with Rick Warren, but I thought he handled this well.



report abuse
 

Freddie de Lange

posted January 21, 2009 at 10:14 am


I also appreciated the way he handled it.
Everyone knows he is a Christian, so I think that most people would have expected him to pray to/through Jesus…



report abuse
 

Peter

posted January 21, 2009 at 10:17 am


Yours is a website I visit every day. For me, Rick Warren’s invitation to then Senator/P.Candidate Obama to come to Warren’s church to face his congreagation and the nation (along with Senator McCain) was an invitation and a challenge, first to evganelicals, then to the nation as a whole-but especially to the those present at the church, to see everyone there in a powerful way as WE. The inaugural invitation to Rick Warren was a hand reaching back, “we may be really different but it is “we” and not “us” and “them” here today”. Politics on both sides may have been a motivator, we all have egos and agendas, but I think God was showing us another example of what it looks like when we do unto others what we want others to do to us.



report abuse
 

Mariam

posted January 21, 2009 at 10:22 am


I always appreciate those who pray before groups in a spontaneous, Spirit-driven way. And yetâ?¦it didnâ??t quite work in this setting. A reminder that, at times, there is nothing wrong with a formal written prayer, either. But, I am willing to let Pastor Rick be himself, I guess.



report abuse
 

Kyler

posted January 21, 2009 at 10:32 am


I was also quite impressed with Warren’s use of the Shema from the Hebrew Scriptures, as well as calling God “the compassionate and merciful” (a standard referent for God in Islam). I thought he was as inclusive as he could possibly have been while still praying a Christian prayer. It seemed to me that pretty much everyone who is religious could relate to what he was saying, even if they couldn’t, strictly speaking, pray along with him.



report abuse
 

Will Hapeman

posted January 21, 2009 at 2:06 pm


Yesterday i was so pleased and happy claim Rick Warren as a brother in Christ. I had tears in my eyes as he did a great job. today I am disheartened as i read the jabs and jeers from the Christian bloggers unhappy with Warrens words. Criticism is so easy, leading a country like ours in prayer so hard. Why are so many Christians so critical as to be an embarrassment and a stumbling block?
Way to go Rick! Shame on you fault finders seeing the motes in his prayer. Watch your beams.



report abuse
 

Some Inaugural Links | Theology for the Masses

posted January 21, 2009 at 2:11 pm

Big Roundup « 4Simpsons Blog - Eternity Matters

posted January 21, 2009 at 2:40 pm

Victoria Day

posted January 21, 2009 at 6:49 pm


Ten thumbs up for Rick Warren. Having been critical of his teachings myself, I didn’t think he had it in him. I was wrong.
It’s amazing how many points he scored with true, bible believing Christians by standing firm in the name of Jesus. NO COMPROMISE! It was the only REAL prayer offered that day.



report abuse
 

Steve

posted January 21, 2009 at 7:21 pm


I bet I know what is up next….



report abuse
 

D Groothuis

posted January 22, 2009 at 11:00 am


If Warren did not pray that Obama would repent of his zeal to increase abortions, he did not do much. Where are the Jeremiah’s and John the Baptists today?



report abuse
 

Jeff W

posted January 22, 2009 at 6:56 pm


Doug G….you are right. But let’s remember he was the one asked and not us. I am a pastor and you are a seminary professor. We are small potatoes compared to Brother Warren. I think he was right on and certainly surprised me with how he ended his prayer and went right into the Lord’s Prayer.



report abuse
 

Randy

posted January 23, 2009 at 5:06 am


President Obama has a “zeal to increase abortions ” ? Hmmmm



report abuse
 

Ted M. Gossard

posted January 24, 2009 at 12:40 pm


Amen. I was much moved and impressed by Warren’s prayer. Maybe he had memorized it, or was going with notes, or more likely had it written out. But it reflected his tradition, and I think was well spoken both in manner, and in content.
Helpful analysis. Thanks.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Mark D. Roberts. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Red Letters with Tom Davis Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!  

posted 2:09:11pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Why Did Jesus Have to Die? Conclusions
In this series on the death of Jesus, I have presented four different perspectives on why Jesus had to die: Roman, Jewish, Jesus’, and Early Christian. I believe that each of these points of view has merit, and that we cannot fully understand the necessity of Jesus’ death without taking them all

posted 2:47:39am Apr. 11, 2011 | read full post »

Sunday Inspiration from the High Calling
Can We Find God in the City? Psalm 48:1-14 Go, inspect the city of Jerusalem. Walk around and count the many towers. Take note of the fortified walls, and tour all the citadels, that you may describe them to future generations. For that is what God is like. He is our God forever and ever,

posted 2:05:51am Apr. 10, 2011 | read full post »

Why Did Jesus Have to Die? The Perspective of the First Christians, Part 3
An Act and Symbol of Love Perhaps one of the most startling of the early Christian interpretations of the cross was that it was all about love. It’s easy in our day, when crosses are religious symbols, attractive ornaments, and trendy jewelry to associate the cross with love. But, in the first

posted 2:41:47am Apr. 08, 2011 | read full post »

Why Did Jesus Have to Die? The Perspective of the First Christians, Part 2
The Means of Reconciliation In my last post, I examined one of the very earliest Christian statements of the purpose of Jesus’ death. According to the tradition encapsulated in 1 Corinthians 15, Jesus died “for our sins in accordance with the scriptures” (15:3). Yet this text doesn’t expl

posted 2:30:03am Apr. 07, 2011 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.