Mark D. Roberts

Mark D. Roberts

One of My Pet Peeves

Recently my family and I went on a short camping trip to Big Sur, California. This is one of the prettiest spots in the whole state, and, in my opinion, in the whole country. Big Sur combines rugged coastline with redwood forests, soaring mountains with lush meadows. Summertime highs are right around 70 degrees, and it’s usually sunny after the morning fog burns off.
We took a hike, more of a scramble, actually up the Big Sur River. This river flows through a narrow gorge in the mountains. Eventually you can’t go further upstream without some serious climbing equipment, so we turned around.
About a half mile up the river I saw something that made my insides burn with anger. There, on a rock in the middle of the river, somebody had left three bottles, a perfectly placed collection of litter. The perpetrator, nowhere to be seen, cared enough about the beauty of the place to hike and climb in. And then, for reasons that completely escape me, he or she left a bunch of litter to soil the scene for the next visitor. Why? What in the world was this person thinking?
I’m not surprised to see litter at places easily reached by car. I’m used to highway viewpoints strewn with empty beer bottles. I mean, you can expect a bunch of drunks to clean up after themselves, now can you? But I’m always amazed to find litter in exceedingly beautiful and hard to reach spots. I just can’t figure out how somebody can love nature enough to make a major effort to get to some pristine place, only to ruin that place by leaving behind a Coke can. What’s up with that?
On my way out of the Big Sur gorge, I noticed that state park officials had recently added some trash cans and a new sign. But the sign struck me as oddly confusing. It reads, “PACK IT IN – PACK IT OUT. NO GARBAGE COLLECTION IN THIS AREA.” Then there are two brand, spanking new trash cans. Is the sign telling you not to use these cans because nobody will ever collect the garbage? That’s the most literal rendering, but I can’t believe that’s the meaning. I think the sign means: “No garbage collection beyond this point. Please bring your garbage back here and put it in these cans because there will be garbage collection in this exact area.” At least I hope that’s what it means. Sadly enough, however, this sign didn’t appear to make a whit of difference to the person who left the bottles on the rock.
In case you’re wondering, yes, I did collect those bottles. And, yes, I did put them in the shiny new trash cans, in the hope that, indeed, garbage collection does happen in that area.

  • Denes House

    Teaching my son (now five years old) to consider others before himself – what used to be called “common courtesy” but has become hideously uncommon – has been a struggle. It has made me much more aware of my own actions, while driving, walking down the street, or dealing with garbage. Teaching him to return shopping carts to the cart corral when done with them, to throw all garbage into cans rather than on the ground, to step aside so that others may pass, and to generally defer to others whenever possible, are all practical outworkings of the Biblical command to love our neighbor and enemy.
    Is it too analytical to say that littering (and graffiti) are at core emblematic of a culture that looks out for one’s own interests first and only? That considers the other only when they can further my goals? Selfishness, pure and simple. It would be a bother to pack those empty bottles out with me, so I’ll just leave them here. In the grnd scheme of things, what is more important than my own convenience?

Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Mark D. Roberts. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Red Letters with Tom Davis Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration ...

posted 2:09:11pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Why Did Jesus Have to Die? Conclusions
In this series on the death of Jesus, I have presented four different perspectives on why Jesus had to die: Roman, Jewish, Jesus’, and Early Christian. I believe that each of these points of view has merit, and that we cannot fully understand ...

posted 2:47:39am Apr. 11, 2011 | read full post »

Sunday Inspiration from the High Calling
Can We Find God in the City? Psalm 48:1-14 Go, inspect the city of Jerusalem. Walk around and count the many towers. Take note of the fortified walls, and tour all the citadels, that you may describe them to future generations. For that ...

posted 2:05:51am Apr. 10, 2011 | read full post »

Why Did Jesus Have to Die? The Perspective of the First Christians, Part 3
An Act and Symbol of Love Perhaps one of the most startling of the early Christian interpretations of the cross was that it was all about love. It’s easy in our day, when crosses are religious symbols, attractive ornaments, and trendy ...

posted 2:41:47am Apr. 08, 2011 | read full post »

Why Did Jesus Have to Die? The Perspective of the First Christians, Part 2
The Means of Reconciliation In my last post, I examined one of the very earliest Christian statements of the purpose of Jesus’ death. According to the tradition encapsulated in 1 Corinthians 15, Jesus died “for our sins in accordance with ...

posted 2:30:03am Apr. 07, 2011 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.