Lynn v. Sekulow

Lynn v. Sekulow


Sotomayor Convinces 4/9 of Supreme Court She Is Right

posted by Rev. Barry W. Lynn

Jay, give me a break.  Four of the nine Justices of the Supreme Court yesterday reached the same conclusion that Judge Sonia Sotomayor did as a judge on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.  The other five reached an alternative conclusion.  So, are you suggesting that Judge Sotomayor is out of the judicial mainstream?  Or are you suggesting that four sitting justices (technically, three because Justice Souter has retired) are out of the same mainstream?  Last week, Clarence Thomas was a lone dissenter in a case involving a strip search of a 14 year old woman at a high school.  Maybe he is out of the mainstream, too.  How many mainstreams are there? (The Alliance for Justice has done a new report on just how careful Judge Sotomayor is in civil rights cases.)

Yesterday’s decision will play no significant role in the ultimate decision about Judge Sotomayor’s elevation to the high court. She will be on the Supreme Court by the time oral arguments begin in October, and will likely be there for the special September rehearing in the case of the film/ad about Hillary Clinton which the Court also ordered yesterday.  No matter how much money the “Right” spends on ads and no matter how much nonsense Republican Senators spout about “original intent”, “strict constructionism” and other code-words for “we don’t like anybody Obama wants on the court”, she will be approved by a clear Senate majority.
.

This is a really terrific book out by Christopher Eisgruber, the provost of Princeton University (formerly a longtime law professor at New York University law school) called The Next Justice.  It is as clear and crisp an analysis of what is wrong with the current charade we call the “appointments process” for the Supreme Court.  He argues persuasively that all Justices use both ideological and procedural “values” in deciding cases.  On “equal protection” he concludes: “The meaning of equality is fundamentally contested; judges cannot appeal to some uncontroversial standard of equality that exists outside and apart from competing theories about equality.” Thank goodness that Judge Sotomayor understands equality in a way unlike the crabbed view of, say, Clarence Thomas.

Readers interested in hearing an interview with Eisgruber can go to www.cultureshocks.com for a listen.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(4)
post a comment
DGNOCP

posted June 30, 2009 at 3:10 pm


Easy reverend…chill, man.



report abuse
 

Rich

posted June 30, 2009 at 9:47 pm


Barry, I think your comments are on target.
Actually, I am always a bit confused about what Republicans really want. Do they want to follow some perceived mainstream of collective American thought on all hot topics or do they want a never-straying strict constructionist approach to the law?



report abuse
 

N. Lindzee Lindholm

posted July 1, 2009 at 1:16 am


I disagree with you, Rev. Barry, and Mr. Eisgruber’s ethereal argument about equality and equal protection. The very definition of equal as “the same measure, quantity, amount, or number as another” negates the fact of a “controversial standard”.
In the Ricci case, this is no different. The objective standard here was in fact the measured score on the promotional exam which was blindfolded to race. All candidates were given equal opportunity to obtain a passing score, thus no discrimination occurred in the certification of the candidates who obtained this benchmark.



report abuse
 

DSJulian

posted July 1, 2009 at 2:23 pm


Judge Sotomayor is a shoe in. She was nominated for the Federal bench by a conservative GOP President and now she is being renominated by a liberal Democrat President. What a coup! Republicans who vot against her confirmation will be publicly acknowledging that they make bad choices in their appointments, and they will be announcing that they neither need nor want any Latino votes in the next election.



report abuse
 



Previous Posts

Another Blog To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting LynnvSekulow. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here is another blog you may also enjoy: Jay Sekulow: Faith and Justice  Happy Reading!

posted 11:26:38am Aug. 16, 2012 | read full post »

Another blog to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Lynn V. Sekulow. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here is another blog you may also enjoy: Jay Sekulow's Faith and Justice Happy Reading!!!

posted 10:36:04am Jul. 06, 2012 | read full post »

More to Come
Barry,   It's hard to believe that we've been debating these constitutional issues for more than two years now in this space.  I have tremendous respect for you and wish you all the best in your new endeavors.   My friend, I'm sure we will continue to square off in other forums - on n

posted 4:52:22pm Dec. 02, 2010 | read full post »

Thanks for the Memories
Well Jay, the time has come for me to say goodbye. Note to people who are really happy about this: I'm not leaving the planet, just this blog.As I noted in a personal email, after much thought, I have decided to end my participation and contribution to Lynn v. Sekulow and will be doing some blogging

posted 12:24:43pm Nov. 21, 2010 | read full post »

President Obama: Does He Get It?
Barry,   I would not use that label to identify the President.  I will say, however, that President Obama continues to embrace and promote pro-abortion policies that many Americans strongly disagree with.   Take the outcome of the election - an unmistakable repudiation of the Preside

posted 11:46:49am Nov. 05, 2010 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.