Kingdom of Priests

Kingdom of Priests


Tiger Woods to Divorce? Who Cares!

posted by David Klinghoffer

At last, I have something to say about Tiger Woods! And I have mathematician and bon vivant David Berlinski to thank.

There’s been an unwritten law in force around the Internet the past few weeks that every blogger must register impassioned views on Mr. Woods’s philandering, either “Tut tut!” or “Yowza!” or similar. I came up empty, though. The whole thing is such an obviously trumped up nothing of a media story. Neil Postman’s endlessly relevant book title, Amusing Ourselves to Death, seems to have been prophetically invented for it. I mean, please, Tiger Woods is a professional golfer, however highly paid. Why should his adultery and now reportedly pending divorce from Elin Nordegren be of interest? Why care?
I realized I do have one reason. This year I edited the aforementioned Dr. Berlinski’s new essay collection, The Deniable DarwinIn doing so I collected some endorsements for the book’s back cover, including one from high tech/Israel guru George Gilder. Now my colleague Rob Crowther points out the unintended “seen only in retrospect” double entendre in Gilder’s blurb:

David Berlinski is to science writing what Tiger Woods is to golf. He can score from anywhere, against any opponent, on any course.

David’s other book that’s out now, the paperback of The Devil’s Delusion: Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions, might give the wrong impression. He’s on the side of the angels but makes no pretense of being one himself.
Berlinski’s motto has been reported as “To have a good time all the time.” In the book I edited, he refers with a certain sardonic cheer to past relationships, asking at one point, “May I also observe that no one with two ex-wives could possibly be unaware of the deity’s less attractive features?” So as his editor, I’ll just clarify here that contrary to what George Gilder implies, there’s no indication that David Berlinski ever played in Tiger’s tour.


Advertisement
Comments read comments(2)
post a comment
Ashley

posted December 18, 2009 at 6:27 am


Is Tiger really athlete of the decade?
Despite all the chaos of the past few weeks, Tiger Woods was announced ‘Athlete of the Decade’ by Associated Press. Is this justified? I mean, Tiger is more of a businessman than an athlete. Golfers are not ‘athletes’ anyway. Does Colin Montgomeery look like an athlete to you? Many sports bloggers listed on sports index http://www.dozensports.com say that the real athletes of the decade were people like Lance Armstrong, Roger Federer or Coby Bryant, at least they break into a sweat in their sport. Tiger was just a brand.



report abuse
 

Ray Ingles

posted December 18, 2009 at 1:20 pm


As Dave Barry put it, “June 2008 – Tiger Woods, in an epic performance, wins the US Open playing on an injured and very painful knee, thereby proving, beyond all doubt, that golf is not a real sport.”
I’d think that applies to Berlinski, too… “science writing” is not science, either.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

Another Blog To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Kingdom of Priests. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here is another blog you may also enjoy: Kabballah Counseling Happy Reading!

posted 11:24:22am Aug. 16, 2012 | read full post »

Animal Wisdom: The Voice of the Serpent
Our family watched Jaws together the other evening -- which, in case you're wondering, I regard as responsible parenting since our kids are basically too young to be genuinely scared by the film. The whole rest of the next day, two-year-old Saul was chattering about the "shark teeth." "Shark teeth g

posted 3:56:33pm Mar. 16, 2010 | read full post »

Reading Wesley Smith: Why the Darwin Debate Matters
If the intelligent-design side in the evolution debate doesn't receive the support you might expect from people who should be allies, that may be because they haven't grasped why the whole thing matters so urgently. I got an email recently from a journalist whom I'd queried on the subject. "All told

posted 5:07:12pm Mar. 15, 2010 | read full post »

The Mission of the Jews
Don't miss my essay over at First Things on the mission of the Jews to the world. This, I think, the key idea that the Jewish community needs to absorb at this very unusual cultural moment, for the time is so, so right. Non-Jews are waiting for us to fulfill the roll God gave us in the Torah. Please

posted 6:14:16pm Mar. 05, 2010 | read full post »

Darwin at the Mountains of Madness: Evolution & the Occult
Of all the regrettable cultural forces that Darwinism helped unleash, perhaps the most surprising and seemingly unlikely is its role in sparking the creation of modern occultism. Charles Darwin himself could not have been less interested in the topic. But no attempt to assess the scope of his legacy

posted 2:04:11pm Mar. 04, 2010 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.