Kingdom of Priests

Kingdom of Priests


William F. Buckley & the Kings of Judah

posted by David Klinghoffer

Christopher Buckley has an excerpt from his memoir about the loss of his parents, Mr. & Mrs. William F. Buckley, in this Sunday’s New York Times Magazine. It’s affecting but uncomfortable in what I’d regard as the inappropriate detail he goes into about his parents’ faults and their physical decline at the end. How can we know what’s inappropriate? Just imagine if he had written these things when his parents were alive to read them. Does their death and the passage of a year or two make the airing of all this dirty laundry OK.

Not in my view. Your thoughts?
The piece is suffused with religion — or rather, with memories of battling with his father over it. Chris is not a believer — he says this repeatedly — and tells of his directing doctors to pull the plug on his mother. His father was among the most powerful exponents of Catholicism (and incidentally influenced my spiritual evolution).
I’ve never met Chris, though I worked for his father, a great man, at National Review. I don’t have an opinion about the younger Buckley, who is 56 years old and whose humor writing I’ve never been able to appreciate. But something about his memoir does remind me of the pattern you see in the Bible, the books of 1 and 2 Kings, where the greatest kings were often followed by sons who were not so great, to put it mildly. The drop off is often dizzyingly steep.

Among the more notable kings of Judah, Hezekiah (righteous) was followed by Manasseh (spectacularly not righteous), Josiah (very great) was followed by his son Jehoahaz and three successive kings after that who all “did what was evil in the eyes of the Lord.” After which God let Babylonia overrun Jerusalem and burn the Temple.
By point this out, I do NOT mean to imply that Chris Buckley is evil. He may a wonderful, delightful person. I have no idea. But it would be hard to identify a significant way in which he is carrying on his father’s intellectual and spiritual legacy. You may remember his endorsement of Obama back in the fall.
Yet you would think that something in the greatness of a great father would in all likelihood rub off on his son. In Kings, this expectation is disappointed so dramatically that you have to wonder if the Bible is trying to tell us something by it. I’ll save my theory about that for a later post.


Advertisement
Comments read comments(8)
post a comment
Leora

posted April 23, 2009 at 5:43 pm


Maybe his father wasn’t around to mold him–it’s hard to shine brilliantly in public and private life at the same time, and unfortunately, it looks like WFB didn’t. Yes, it’s ungracious and indefensible to air your parents’ dirty laundry. But you have to wonder if the son’s whole inner being would have been radically (or conservatively!) different if his father had been there to guide him. Why is he so bitter? It’s sad, anyhow–I don’t really want to believe these sorts of things about WFB, but he doesn’t sound like he’s lying…



report abuse
 

John

posted April 23, 2009 at 7:45 pm


Christopher Buckley is a brilliant satirist who has written 14 books of wide acclaim. See “Thank You for Smoking.” Bill Buckley was on record as saying that one of his greatest achievements and sources of happiness was the astonishing success of his son’s literary career. I find it rather presumptuous on your part — as a nondescript and unknown blogger on an obscure religious website — to denigrate Christopher Buckley’s accomplishments with your offensive comparison of his situation to that of (probably fictitious) Jewish royalty from thousands of years ago (!!!). Your inability to comprehend the appeal of his work does nothing to dispel the commonly shared perception that irony and satire are incompatible with the religious mentality.



report abuse
 

Richard

posted April 24, 2009 at 8:54 am


Sorry, John. To those of us who worked for WFB’s National Review, David Klinghoffer is scarcely “a nondescript and unknown blogger” and, put bluntly, his views count — and I, for one, find his comments apt.



report abuse
 

ASC

posted April 24, 2009 at 9:36 am


David: You wrote a memoir, and if memory serves painted a portrait of your adopted parents’ religiosity that some readers might have found uncomfortable or inappropriate. I’d like to hear your thoughts, as an experienced memoirist, on how you navigated between the personal and the public (and how you neogotiated the commandment of kibud av v’em).



report abuse
 

Hubbard

posted April 24, 2009 at 10:59 am


Mr. Klinghoffer—
What comes through in Chris Buckley’s piece, at least to me, is that his parents were great people despite some great flaws. If the younger Buckley is a good writer who pushes some uncomfortable truths on his readers, isn’t he really showing himself to be his father’s son?



report abuse
 

Marian

posted April 24, 2009 at 6:40 pm


I once advocated that any man who gets his name in Who’s Who should automatically lose custody of his children. Admittedly that was before I found out how easy it was to get into Who’s Who, and one of my clients put me in there. But I still think the basic principle is sound.



report abuse
 

Neil L

posted April 26, 2009 at 2:33 pm


David K, I think your parallel to the kings of Judah and the Northern Kingdom is not apt. Chris Buckley wrote a phenomenal, luscious and dynamic essay and celebrated his parents while not venerating them. His parents were flawed – as we all are. Buckley wrote with love and humor – and, yes, with some cathartic memories that paint his parents as human.
I would leave what “is evil in the sight of the Lord” to the Lord and be very reluctant to draw parallels myself.



report abuse
 

Sue M

posted May 3, 2009 at 4:43 pm


I have seen several interviews of Buckley and he has never stated anything other than his father was great and he is a more limited successor to his father. By his own admission, his accomplishments are pale in comparison. So, Mr. Kinghoffer, I suspect he would agree with your assessment of him in comparison to his father.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

Another Blog To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Kingdom of Priests. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here is another blog you may also enjoy: Kabballah Counseling Happy Reading!

posted 11:24:22am Aug. 16, 2012 | read full post »

Animal Wisdom: The Voice of the Serpent
Our family watched Jaws together the other evening -- which, in case you're wondering, I regard as responsible parenting since our kids are basically too young to be genuinely scared by the film. The whole rest of the next day, two-year-old Saul was chattering about the "shark teeth." "Shark teeth g

posted 3:56:33pm Mar. 16, 2010 | read full post »

Reading Wesley Smith: Why the Darwin Debate Matters
If the intelligent-design side in the evolution debate doesn't receive the support you might expect from people who should be allies, that may be because they haven't grasped why the whole thing matters so urgently. I got an email recently from a journalist whom I'd queried on the subject. "All told

posted 5:07:12pm Mar. 15, 2010 | read full post »

The Mission of the Jews
Don't miss my essay over at First Things on the mission of the Jews to the world. This, I think, the key idea that the Jewish community needs to absorb at this very unusual cultural moment, for the time is so, so right. Non-Jews are waiting for us to fulfill the roll God gave us in the Torah. Please

posted 6:14:16pm Mar. 05, 2010 | read full post »

Darwin at the Mountains of Madness: Evolution & the Occult
Of all the regrettable cultural forces that Darwinism helped unleash, perhaps the most surprising and seemingly unlikely is its role in sparking the creation of modern occultism. Charles Darwin himself could not have been less interested in the topic. But no attempt to assess the scope of his legacy

posted 2:04:11pm Mar. 04, 2010 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.