Jesus Creed

Jesus Creed


Trinity Sunday

posted by Scot McKnight

Today is Trinity Sunday, so I want to post this about the Trinity:

RonHighfield.jpgHow have theologians understood — or explained — the Trinity?

Ron Highfield’s new book, Great Is the Lord: Theology for the Praise of God , sketches the “Trinity” as well as I’ve seen for an introductory text and the 3d section of chp 4 is about the theological understanding of the Trinity.
He sees three levels of understanding Trinity:
1. The evangelical and doxological — this is how we experience God the Father, through the Son and in the Spirit. Perhaps a way of seeing this is that we experience God as Father, as Son and as Spirit but we don’t comprehend their relations.
2. The economic — how God has revealed himself externally in history. Thus we have time, space, suffering and change.
3. The immanent — the inner life of God, the relationship of Father and Son and Spirit to one another. A fundamental logic is at work here: As God reveals himself, so God is in himself. That is, if God reveals himself as good and gracious, that is because God is good and gracious. Rahner and Moltmann famously contend the immanent and the economic Trinity are the same, and this has led some to make God only his effects …  that is, it denies the otherness and objectivity of God. Highfield rightly observes that this makes the economic Trinity prior. Highfield thinks along with many — Barth, Torrance, Gunton — that we can learn about the immanent Trinity from the economic but not make the two the same.


There are two other views and both have been rejected by Orthodoxy:

Subordinationism, which sees one divine nature and three persons, but ends up denying the same essence/nature in all three persons. Son and Spirit occupy a lower level of being.
Modalism, which sees one divine nature but not three genuine persons or distinctions in the persons. Father, Son and Spirit are three names under which the One God operates. 
One being, three persons — this is the issue.
Being is ousia in Greek and person is hypostasis. Highfield emphasizes, with Gregory Nazianzus,”person” in relation to the other. Being is essential relational: God “is” Father, Son and Spirit. “The Father is his fatherhood, the Son is his sonship, and the Spirit is his ineffable relationship to the Father and the son” (133). Their being is mutual indwelling and interpenetration of the other– that is, the perichoresis. We discover here that God is a community of persons. 


Advertisement
Comments read comments(2)
post a comment
Derek

posted May 30, 2010 at 11:28 am


Thanks for this post. I’ve also found Delighting in the Trinity by Tim Chester to be a great read for giving a biblical, historical and practical approach to the Trinity!



report abuse
 

Wayne Park

posted May 30, 2010 at 7:28 pm


Hans Urs Von Balthasar: Presence and Thought
I like his saying: “Being is Super-Becoming” – riffing off of the immanent and inaccessible divine substance. While we are becoming into the divine it is forever beyond our reach.
thanx for the post. Still trying to figure out how to “preach” Trinity Sunday



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More Blogs To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Jesus Creed. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Red Letters with Tom Davis Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!  

posted 11:15:58am Aug. 16, 2012 | read full post »

Our Common Prayerbook 30 - 3
Psalm 30 thanks God (vv. 1-3, 11-12) and exhorts others to thank God (vv. 4-5). Both emerge from the concrete reality of David's own experience. Here is what that experience looks like:Step one: David was set on high and was flourishing at the hand of God's bounty (v. 7a).Step two: David became too

posted 12:15:30pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Theology After Darwin 1 (RJS)
One of the more important and more difficult pieces of the puzzle as we feel our way forward at the interface of science and faith is the theological implications of discoveries in modern science. A comment on my post Evolution in the Key of D: Deity or Deism noted: ...this reminds me of why I get a

posted 6:01:52am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Almost Christian 4
Who does well when it comes to passing on the faith to the youth? Studies show two groups do really well: conservative Protestants and Mormons; two groups that don't do well are mainline Protestants and Roman Catholics. Kenda Dean's new book is called Almost Christian: What the Faith of Ou

posted 12:01:53am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Let's Get Neanderthal!
The Cave Man Diet, or Paleo Diet, is getting attention. (Nothing is said about Culver's at all.) The big omission, I have to admit, is that those folks were hunters -- using spears or smacking some rabbit upside the conk or grabbing a fish or two with their hands ... but that's what makes this diet

posted 2:05:48pm Aug. 30, 2010 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.