Jesus Creed

Jesus Creed


Our Missional God 19

posted by xscot mcknight

The last two chps of Chris Wright’s excellent book, The Mission of God, concern the most pressing topic of anyone who wants to examine the Old Testament through the lens of “mission.” I tend to think most either ignore what the OT says or distort what the OT says. Wright gets this right.
This is no small problem and so I want to sort some of this and see where we can land and see what you think…
The hopeful view: “The nations are the matrix of Israel’s life, the raison d’etre of her very existence” (here Wright quotes Duane Christensen; p. 454). Wright: “It is God’s mission in relation to the nations, arguably more than any other single theme, that provides the key that unlocks the biblical grand narrative” (455).
The problem: First, reality: Israel did almost nothing to bless other nations in any missional sense. Second, individuals: if the narrative eventually ends up with Israel — through Jesus and the Church — “missioning” to all the nations (and most of us are beneficiaries of this), it took a long time and what about all those who never heard? Why did God wait so long? Third, hermeneutics: Is it the case that we are hoping to find more Gentile blessings in the OT than are really there? And this leads us to finding such blessings.
The strategy: God chooses Israel. “It was a much more exalted and universal claim — a claim that would be the grossest arrogance if not true. The claim was that YHWH was in fact the sovereign God of all the earth, ruling the histories and destinies of all nations. And in that context of universal involvement with all nations, YHWH had a unique relationship with Israel” (463). God’s unique relation with Israel involved a mission to the nations.
The sharp edge: “…. the covenant demands two sides: Israel belongs to YHWH, and YHWH belongs to Israel … . But in the case of the nations we may say that the nations belong to YHWH, but YHWH does not yet belong to the nations” (466).
So, the themes of the OT unfold into these four ideas:
1. The nations are witnesses observers of what YHWH does in and to Israel (Exod 15:14-16). They observe God’s covenant obligations, God’s judgments on Israel, and God’s restoration of Israel.
2. The nations can be beneficiaries of the blessings inherent in Israel’s covenant (Ps 67:1-3).
3. The nations will come to know and worship Israel’s God (Ps 86:8-10; Isa 66:18-23).
4. The nations will ultimately be included within the identity of Israel as God’s people (Ps 47). But here is Isa 19:16-25, and this one text can stand for a variety of others that anticipate redemption for all nations…

16 In that day the Egyptians will be like women. They will shudder with fear at the uplifted hand that the Lord Almighty raises against them. 17 And the land of Judah will bring terror to the Egyptians; everyone to whom Judah is mentioned will be terrified, because of what the Lord Almighty is planning against them.
18 In that day five cities in Egypt will speak the language of Canaan and swear allegiance to the Lord Almighty. One of them will be called the City of Destruction.
19 In that day there will be an altar to the Lord in the heart of Egypt, and a monument to the Lord at its border. 20 It will be a sign and witness to the Lord Almighty in the land of Egypt. When they cry out to the Lord because of their oppressors, he will send them a savior and defender, and he will rescue them. 21 So the Lord will make himself known to the Egyptians, and in that day they will acknowledge the Lord. They will worship with sacrifices and grain offerings; they will make vows to the Lord and keep them. 22 The Lord will strike Egypt with a plague; he will strike them and heal them. They will turn to the Lord, and he will respond to their pleas and heal them.
23 In that day there will be a highway from Egypt to Assyria. The Assyrians will go to Egypt and the Egyptians to Assyria. The Egyptians and Assyrians will worship together. 24 In that day Israel will be the third, along with Egypt and Assyria, a blessing on the earth. 25 The Lord Almighty will bless them, saying, ?Blessed be Egypt my people, Assyria my handiwork, and Israel my inheritance.?



Advertisement
Comments read comments(4)
post a comment
Frank Viola

posted September 30, 2008 at 5:33 am


Another great post, Scot. I think the other Wright (Tom) has also done some fantastic work expounding OT Israel’s place in the Mission of God.
Quick question: I’ve not yet gotten my hands on the book you’re reviewing here, but I’m wondering if Wright gives any airplay to the “eternal purpose” of God (Eph. 3:11) in his discussion of mission. (I’ve found this to be a missing note in most missional books that I’ve read thus far.)



report abuse
 

Travis Greene

posted September 30, 2008 at 8:46 am


Here’s a question: why (if the OT is about Israel’s mission to the nations) have the Jewish people historically been uninterested in evangelizing or proselytizing? It’s actually kind of difficult to convert to Judaism. I think these 4 points have biblical warrant, but it’s also probably true that we really want to see God’s blessings for the Gentiles in the OT (probably since most of us are Gentiles).



report abuse
 

Nick

posted September 30, 2008 at 3:09 pm


Interesting post Scot, you make several helpful remarks. Although I think we should be careful not to collapse (or read back) the church?s mission onto Israel. Certainly there are similarities but there are also differences. Thus Israel also was to be an instrument of judgment, often through annihilation, to the nations. They were not told to be ?missionaries? and ?evangelist? to the Canaanites. I think is has been best summed up in this way: ?Israel?s mission was, ?come and see, while the churches mission is, go and tell.?



report abuse
 

Patrick

posted October 1, 2008 at 12:32 am


Wright’s chapters are quite good, but they prompt larger questions. What does it tell us about God (rather than Israel) that he elected one people and didn’t reveal himself simultaneously to every nation or individual? It must say something about the nature of God that He made himself known in and through one particular story separate from the general story of humankind–unless there *is* no general story of humankind apart from the shape outlined in the particular story.
Since I believe that every human being, whatever their degree of acquaintance with that story is ultimately given a chance to embrace (or not)the God behind it, it doesn’t offend me that special revelation was (is)not extended to everyone at once. Rather, it makes me think that I don’t really know what kind of God this is unless I can understand why he chose this way to reveal himself–which is a check against presumption, since I doubt I will fathom it in this life. Still, without some idea of why, surely a missional theology is incomplete.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More Blogs To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Jesus Creed. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Red Letters with Tom Davis Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!  

posted 11:15:58am Aug. 16, 2012 | read full post »

Our Common Prayerbook 30 - 3
Psalm 30 thanks God (vv. 1-3, 11-12) and exhorts others to thank God (vv. 4-5). Both emerge from the concrete reality of David's own experience. Here is what that experience looks like:Step one: David was set on high and was flourishing at the hand of God's bounty (v. 7a).Step two: David became too

posted 12:15:30pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Theology After Darwin 1 (RJS)
One of the more important and more difficult pieces of the puzzle as we feel our way forward at the interface of science and faith is the theological implications of discoveries in modern science. A comment on my post Evolution in the Key of D: Deity or Deism noted: ...this reminds me of why I get a

posted 6:01:52am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Almost Christian 4
Who does well when it comes to passing on the faith to the youth? Studies show two groups do really well: conservative Protestants and Mormons; two groups that don't do well are mainline Protestants and Roman Catholics. Kenda Dean's new book is called Almost Christian: What the Faith of Ou

posted 12:01:53am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Let's Get Neanderthal!
The Cave Man Diet, or Paleo Diet, is getting attention. (Nothing is said about Culver's at all.) The big omission, I have to admit, is that those folks were hunters -- using spears or smacking some rabbit upside the conk or grabbing a fish or two with their hands ... but that's what makes this diet

posted 2:05:48pm Aug. 30, 2010 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.