Jesus Creed

Jesus Creed


First Day is Goldingay

posted by xscot mcknight

This is our fourth consecutive month where the first day of the month is devoted to a post on John Goldingay’s OT Theology: Israel’s Gospel. This OT theology is unlike any OT theology I’ve seen — it is theological reflection on the unfolding narrative of the First Testament (his term), and this long chp is about “God Promised: Israel’s Ancestors” (the patriarchal narratives of Genesis 12–50).
How does one summarize such a conglomeration of texts, characters, and theological themes? I’ll just give some highlights, admitting there is no way to summarize this stuff. Here are the themes: God’s charge and promises, blessings — nationhood and land, being a blessing, Abr’s God and other peoples, promise and fulfillment, God, relating to God, marriage and parenthood, and family life.
When we speak of the Abrahamic promise we are using NT words — “promise” isn’t really an OT word. There are promises, of course, but there is no Hebrew word that means “promise.” They are God’s statements. He calls humans to be whole but the antithesis of body and spirit is foreign to First Testament thinking: “Seeing the inner as more important than the outer would contradict its vision of our human wholeness and of God’s creative involvement with our whole lives” (199).
On God: “God has a hard time being legalistic and is inclined to make tough-looking rules but then leave loopholes for the exceptional circumstances that arise in life” (202).
On circumcision: as a mark on man’s sexual potential, it “becomes the covenant indictment [failure by males] and covenant shame upon men” (203). I’ve not seen circumcision connected so much to sexual potential.
He explores the dimensions of the “promises” to Abraham … with flair and thoroughness.
On election: he connects election to vocation instead of simply to soteriology. “So talk about blessing indicates both a distinctive privilege and a concern for other peoples” (214). “There is one blessing in order that there may be many” (217).
On “prophet”: “A prophet is admitted to Yhwh’s cabinet where events on earth are reviewed and plans for earth are formulated, and that prophet has opportunity to take part in decision-making processes as well as eventually to leak their results on earth” (220).
On Abraham’s God and Other peoples: lengthy, ruminative, insightful stuff here on the presence of God and God at work with non-Israelites. He makes the point that Abraham’s line is not all that different from the world around them.
Goldingay is incredibly realistic about the tone and texture of the texts about men and women and husbands and wives and family life. “Either Yhwh does not think that abolishing patriarchy is the most pressing issue, or does not think anything can be done about it. The continuing prevalence of patriarchy in the church suggests that at least the latter is still true” (271).



Advertisement
Comments read comments(7)
post a comment
Ted Gossard

posted July 2, 2007 at 4:46 am


I like the free thinking of Goldingay here, free in the sense of still bound by Scripture, but seeing it for what it is. It seems like those steeped in the Old Testament arrive more to this kind of perspective, at least potentially and from what I’ve seen.



report abuse
 

John Frye

posted July 2, 2007 at 7:04 am


It is refreshing to read the same OT texts through a narrative theology rather than a systematic theology grid. I agree with Ted (comment #1), Goldingay’s free thinking is very refreshing, yet he’s still grappling with the text.



report abuse
 

Anonymous

posted July 2, 2007 at 7:53 am


Pseudo-Polymath » Blog Archive » Morning Highlights

[...] A blogger tied to time, first post of the month locked on topic at Jesus Creed by Scot McNight. [...]



report abuse
 

Dana Ames

posted July 2, 2007 at 1:31 pm


Scot,
how would you compare Goldingay with Bruggeman? Ok with me if you want to wait until the end of the book to answer this. I’m really curious, though.
Dana



report abuse
 

Andie

posted July 2, 2007 at 4:12 pm


Scot, just ordered the book this morning. I’m glad you are only doing this once a month; maybe I can catch up and keep up. :)



report abuse
 

Peggy

posted July 2, 2007 at 4:29 pm


Scot,
I was struck by “Goldingay is incredibly realistic about the tone and texture of the texts about men and women and husbands and wives and family life. “Either Yhwh does not think that abolishing patriarchy is the most pressing issue, or does not think anything can be done about it. The continuing prevalence of patriarchy in the church suggests that at least the latter is still true” (271).”
Great to think on this for a moment, as opposed react….
I do agree that patriarchy is not the most pressing issue…and God will not do anything about it. Neither of these statements mean that it is not important, but that they both have been dealt with in the New Covenant.
And, as with the Old Covenant, God does not “make” his covenant people “keep covenant faithfully”, but he certainly expects it. That we settle for less, even turning it on its head and saying that God supports it, must grieve God. But he is patient and full of mercy and restraint…and this gives me hope!



report abuse
 

Diane

posted July 2, 2007 at 6:02 pm


I am on the road and hence having a hard time keeping on all these very interesting threads. I too have felt I have noticed that for God patirarchy and even how we organize marriages (given the amount of polygamy we see in the OT) does not seem to be the most pressing issue. He seems to work with whatever material he’s got. I feel that Paul understood this in a very profound way and that he understood that God is less about setting up the perfect socio-political state and much more about creating the perfect people with hearts for him who will transform whatever socio-political state happens to be in existence into the KOG. But this is all impressionistic for me, the sort of seeping in of multiple Bible readings, so I am interested in what other people have to say. I also have to note that while God works through polygamists, the polygamy stories we have in the Bible are almost 100 percent a tidal wave of the grief that comes out of polygamy, underlining again the importance of story.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More Blogs To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Jesus Creed. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Red Letters with Tom Davis Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!  

posted 11:15:58am Aug. 16, 2012 | read full post »

Our Common Prayerbook 30 - 3
Psalm 30 thanks God (vv. 1-3, 11-12) and exhorts others to thank God (vv. 4-5). Both emerge from the concrete reality of David's own experience. Here is what that experience looks like:Step one: David was set on high and was flourishing at the hand of God's bounty (v. 7a).Step two: David became too

posted 12:15:30pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Theology After Darwin 1 (RJS)
One of the more important and more difficult pieces of the puzzle as we feel our way forward at the interface of science and faith is the theological implications of discoveries in modern science. A comment on my post Evolution in the Key of D: Deity or Deism noted: ...this reminds me of why I get a

posted 6:01:52am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Almost Christian 4
Who does well when it comes to passing on the faith to the youth? Studies show two groups do really well: conservative Protestants and Mormons; two groups that don't do well are mainline Protestants and Roman Catholics. Kenda Dean's new book is called Almost Christian: What the Faith of Ou

posted 12:01:53am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Let's Get Neanderthal!
The Cave Man Diet, or Paleo Diet, is getting attention. (Nothing is said about Culver's at all.) The big omission, I have to admit, is that those folks were hunters -- using spears or smacking some rabbit upside the conk or grabbing a fish or two with their hands ... but that's what makes this diet

posted 2:05:48pm Aug. 30, 2010 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.