Jesus Creed

Jesus Creed


JKA Smith on Postmodernism

posted by xscot mcknight

Jamie KA Smith has a new, readable, useful book on postmodernity called Who’s Afraid of Postmodernism?. I want to recommend as the best interface of evangelical concerns and traditional theology with postmodernism. It is not as saucy or philosophical as Caputo’s new book, but it is more theological and more aimed at evangelicals who are nervous about postmodernism.
Smith debunks three major mistakes being made by critics: that Derrida really means everything is only text (he means in fact “interpretation”); that Lyotard really meant death to all metanarratives (he meant death to the ability to prove them from an independent neutral base); and that Foucault meant that power is knowledge (well, he was close to this).
Two points: Smith argues that each of these scholars empower the witness of the Christian gospel. By undercutting modernity, they provide an opportunity for Christians to step in with a faith that is in search of understanding.
And, Smith contends (and I think he needs to make a better, clearer case for this) that postmodernism creates a need for Christianity to return to an ancient-future faith. His central thesis is that much of low-church evangelicalism reflects modernity with its exaggerated individualism and that tradition and ecclesiology flow naturally from the postmodern turn. Well, he’s got lots of good points and I hope you read this book too.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(10)
post a comment
Andy Cornett

posted April 28, 2006 at 5:43 am


One of my major blessings from college was a senior seminar in philosophy called “Christianity and Postmodern Thought.” To have a professor who could lead with devotions from 1 John and others, link to the idolatries of modernity, and then passionately engage Derrida, Foucault, Nietzsche and others forever ruined me to those who would just rely on secondary sources, throw up a wall of concerns, and consign such thinkers to the realm of forbidden authors. Now ten years later I still find in Derrida a brillant, careful reader and thinker who showed us the mysteries of musing on a text. From them and others I learned much of the economies of grace and truth, and found them to be as you said: teachers who level the playing field and re-open the door to a faith seeking understanding and the witness that follows. I’ll have to get this book by Smith – may his tribe increase!
grace and peace – Andy



report abuse
 

Rob

posted April 28, 2006 at 5:46 am


I picked up this book based on a recommendation from a friend. I think it is great so far (I’m in the chapter on Foucault). I blogged about it as well. It looks like this will be the first in a series of books looking at what Christian thought/practice can look like in a Postmodern Culture. Looking forward to other releases in this series.



report abuse
 

Duane Young

posted April 28, 2006 at 6:24 am


BTW and FYI–I got a flyer in the mail yesterday from Baker Academic offering this book and three others at 50% off. Call 800-877-2665 and “quote order code PHIL.”
The other three books are “Rethinking Human Nature,” by Kevin J. Corcoran, “The Shadow of the AntiChrist” by Stephen N. Williams, and “Introducing Apologetics” by James E. Taylor.



report abuse
 

Allan R. Bevere

posted April 28, 2006 at 6:37 am


Scot:
I agree. Smith’s book is excellent. I just finished reading a critique of postmodernism and the emergent movement by another Smith out at Biola University, entitled, “Truth and the New Kind of Christian.” His critique is extremely disappointing in large part because he gets the language thing and the lack of neutral standpoint so wrong. His critique of Hauerwas and Grenz in particular is quite off the mark, and frankly, he doesn’t engage them rigorously. Hauerwas himself denies he is postmodern or modern in that he believes that such categories continue to reinforce the myth that we can be done with past. How Smith (Biola)gets away with omitting this suggests that he has not read those he critiques as closely as he should.
In any case, “Who’s Afraid of Postmodernism” is an excellent read.



report abuse
 

Cam West

posted April 28, 2006 at 10:27 am


Would anyone care to compare Smith’s ‘Who’s Afraid of Postmodernism?’ to Raschke’s ‘The Next Reformation: Why Evangelicals Must Embrace Postmodernity’, also by Baker? Personally I found it a fantastic read, managing to maintain depth and breadth at the same time, and in a way that’s accessible to a non-specialist in philosophy.



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted April 28, 2006 at 10:30 am


Cam,
I’d love to if I could. Raschke is on my desk, waiting to be read. I hope to get to it soon.
Allan,
Others have said the same about Scott (?) Smith’s book. I appreciate that Smith did interact with the emerging movement more sympathetically — he came to better terms with what is going on than other critics.



report abuse
 

billy

posted April 28, 2006 at 10:45 am


Thanks for the recommendation!



report abuse
 

Makeesha

posted April 28, 2006 at 6:05 pm


thanks for the recommendation – and just fwiw, I love the cover hehe



report abuse
 

Allan R. Bevere

posted April 28, 2006 at 7:02 pm


Scot:
True, Scott Smith’s book is sympathetic. That what was so disappointing about the critique. When I neared the end of the book, I was expecting something more rigorous and therefore helpful, but that did not happen. I was expecting that someone coming from his perspective could challenge the emergent movement in a profound and constructive way. Instead, it was just more of the same modernist argument that is so wanting.



report abuse
 

R Scott Smith

posted May 28, 2006 at 12:44 am


Allan, hi! I did a Google search & came acorss these posts. Would you mind spelling out more what you mean by a couple comments, please? (1) “His critique is extremely disappointing in large part because he gets the **language thing** and the **lack of neutral standpoint so wrong**.” [I highlighted some of your text by putting ** around them.] (2) “Instead, it was just more of the same modernist argument that is so wanting.” And, (3) about Grenz & Hauerwas – I have written much more on Hauerwas elsewhere (see “Virtue Ethics & Moral Knowledge); & on Grenz, too – e.g., in “Reclaiming the Center.” But, I am most interested in 1 & 2, please. Then maybe we can go from there in some dialogue!
Thanks,
Scott



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More Blogs To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Jesus Creed. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Red Letters with Tom Davis Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!  

posted 11:15:58am Aug. 16, 2012 | read full post »

Our Common Prayerbook 30 - 3
Psalm 30 thanks God (vv. 1-3, 11-12) and exhorts others to thank God (vv. 4-5). Both emerge from the concrete reality of David's own experience. Here is what that experience looks like:Step one: David was set on high and was flourishing at the hand of God's bounty (v. 7a).Step two: David became too

posted 12:15:30pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Theology After Darwin 1 (RJS)
One of the more important and more difficult pieces of the puzzle as we feel our way forward at the interface of science and faith is the theological implications of discoveries in modern science. A comment on my post Evolution in the Key of D: Deity or Deism noted: ...this reminds me of why I get a

posted 6:01:52am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Almost Christian 4
Who does well when it comes to passing on the faith to the youth? Studies show two groups do really well: conservative Protestants and Mormons; two groups that don't do well are mainline Protestants and Roman Catholics. Kenda Dean's new book is called Almost Christian: What the Faith of Ou

posted 12:01:53am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Let's Get Neanderthal!
The Cave Man Diet, or Paleo Diet, is getting attention. (Nothing is said about Culver's at all.) The big omission, I have to admit, is that those folks were hunters -- using spears or smacking some rabbit upside the conk or grabbing a fish or two with their hands ... but that's what makes this diet

posted 2:05:48pm Aug. 30, 2010 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.