Jesus Creed

Jesus Creed


Gracious Christianity 2

posted by xscot mcknight

In the first chp in their primer on theology from the angle of grace, Jacobsen and Sawatsky look at God and Creation. They look at God as Creator, as One and as Trinity. God, so they say, did not create because God had to; nor did God create and then get stuck with what God had made. Instead — and this is a claim that brings great joy — God acted out of love and God made a delightful world!
The sheer variety, beauty, goodness and magnificence of the world cannot blunt the force of another important observation: God’s act of creation was an act of sharing himself with others. I first read this in Jonathan Edward years ago, but the point still boggles: creation is in some sense an extension of God’s perichoretic love into others (both humans and others). It is a burst of God’s love that generates creation.
There is only One God, and Jacobsen and Sawatsky remind us that we ought to be more cirucmspect and reverential in what we say about God. They delve into “apophatic” theological reasoning: speaking of God is so inarticulate, so incapable of strikinghome, and so finite for describing the Infinite, that theology sometimes says what it doesn’t know. Sometimes “silence about God may often be more appropriate than overly eager speech” (31).
But they do not back down: some things can be said. Each of these things should be said, but each should be contextualized by the others: God is King, God is Savior, God is just, etc.. Each helps define the other. But what both believe is the final statement is that God is love. And, though they do not quote Augustine here, they could have: “views about God that encourage us to love others are more likely on target than those that cause us to hate others or to hold them in disdain” (32).
On the Trinity, they explore the various ways, many of them unsuccessful, Christians have attempted to come to terms with the claim that God is Trinity. They find the most useful one to that of Augustine: that God is a lover (Father), the beloved (the Son), and the love (Spirit). [I'd like to have seen an exploration of the perichoresis alongside Augustine's well-known and useful analogy.]
The authors of Gracious Christianity then suggest that the Trinity has profound implications for life — and they detail two: (1) it shapes ethics as an interpersonal ethic and a self-giving ethic, and (2) a holistic epistemology. This latter idea is quite profound I think: if the Father and Son and Spirit mutually interpenetrate one another, then all of existence finds a foundation for being holistic and integrative. Well, that is how I read them on this point.
Nice chp: easy to ready; good ideas; suggestive for groups to think through.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(2)
post a comment
Duane Young

posted February 2, 2006 at 8:08 am


“. . . Christians should avoid calling God their own. God does not belong to us; we belong to God (p.31). If that thought took hold wouldn’t that alter the nature of our dialogue with “others?” It would, I think, amount to a seismic shift–and for good. [This is a great little book.]



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted February 2, 2006 at 8:43 am


Duane,
I agree with you. I’m liking the book more and more.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More Blogs To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Jesus Creed. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Red Letters with Tom Davis Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!  

posted 11:15:58am Aug. 16, 2012 | read full post »

Our Common Prayerbook 30 - 3
Psalm 30 thanks God (vv. 1-3, 11-12) and exhorts others to thank God (vv. 4-5). Both emerge from the concrete reality of David's own experience. Here is what that experience looks like:Step one: David was set on high and was flourishing at the hand of God's bounty (v. 7a).Step two: David became too

posted 12:15:30pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Theology After Darwin 1 (RJS)
One of the more important and more difficult pieces of the puzzle as we feel our way forward at the interface of science and faith is the theological implications of discoveries in modern science. A comment on my post Evolution in the Key of D: Deity or Deism noted: ...this reminds me of why I get a

posted 6:01:52am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Almost Christian 4
Who does well when it comes to passing on the faith to the youth? Studies show two groups do really well: conservative Protestants and Mormons; two groups that don't do well are mainline Protestants and Roman Catholics. Kenda Dean's new book is called Almost Christian: What the Faith of Ou

posted 12:01:53am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Let's Get Neanderthal!
The Cave Man Diet, or Paleo Diet, is getting attention. (Nothing is said about Culver's at all.) The big omission, I have to admit, is that those folks were hunters -- using spears or smacking some rabbit upside the conk or grabbing a fish or two with their hands ... but that's what makes this diet

posted 2:05:48pm Aug. 30, 2010 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.