Jesus Creed

Jesus Creed


Kingdom of God 7

posted by xscot mcknight

The Apostle Paul’s view of Ecclesia is consistent with Jesus’ view of Kingdom (Basileia).

For Paul, Kingdom is primarily Eternity or the Final Future Kingdom (see 1 C or 15:24), though he does use it in a way that makes me think he sees the Ecclesia as the primary manifestation of the Kingdom in the present world (Rom 14:17).

If we recall our comments on The Magnificat and Jesus’ inaugural sermon, and recall the socio-economic emphasis on restoring humans to the Table, then I think we are body to see three themes in Paul’s Ecclesia that derive directly from these central teachings of Jesus.

First, for Paul the Ecclesia is the Body of Christ (1 Cor 12–14). It is a society that functions properly.

Second, for Paul the Ecclesia is a pneumatic body (again, 1 Cor 12–14). It is a society enlivened and empowered by the Holy Spirit.

Third, for Paul the Ecclesia is a radically new society wherein old distictions are gone and new creation lives. “Neither Jew nor Gentile, slave nor free, male nor female…” (Gal 3:28).

Fourth, for Paul the Ecclesia is an alternative society to the Empire of Rome and the intended goal for all peoples. When we begin to think in terms of the future, kingdom language takes over.

Finally, for Paul the Ecclesia is a saving presence for the entire world. Notice these words from Romans 8:

Rom. 8:18 I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worth comparing with the glory about to be revealed to us. 19 For the creation waits with eager longing for the revealing of the children of God; 20 for the creation was subjected to futility, not of its own will but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope 21 that the creation itself will be set free from its bondage to decay and will obtain the freedom of the glory of the children of God. 22 We know that the whole creation has been groaning in labor pains until now; 23 and not only the creation, but we ourselves, who have the first fruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly while we wait for adoption, the redemption of our bodies. 24 For in hope we were saved. Now hope that is seen is not hope. For who hopes for what is seen? 25 But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience.

Put together now:

The Kingdom of God is the society in which the will of God is done and, in the hands of the early Apostles, this Kingdom society morphs into the “Church” as they move into the Roman Empire. But, in so doing, they do not drop the central social and global concerns of Jesus but demonstrate that they think through the Spirit these social concerns will be enlivened and empowered. What is also important is that they see the Church in more “sectarian” terms than Jesus saw the Kingdom — which makes sense: they are small part of a huge machine (Roman Empire) while he had claims on the entire nation of Israel.

(A nice little survey of this can be found in David Wenham, Paul: Follower of Jesus or Founder of Christianity? and in Paul and Jesus: The True Story.)

The Church, as I see it, is an alternative society of Jesus designed to witness to and work for the redemption of the world.

So what does this tell us?

The first and most important lesson is that we need to be very careful when we make comments that suggest Jesus’ teachings are not consistent with Paul’s when it comes to Kingdom and Church. Paul (and Peter) were driven by their status in the Roman Empire and by the smallness of the movement to set up local missional communities of faith and to concentrate their concerns there — but their vision was the same as Jesus’. Kingdom of God, when “on earth” looked like “in heaven.”

Second, it means that Paul’s whole theology of salvation — terms like justification, atonement, and the like — are part and parcel of how the Ecclesia is formed, and this too is consistent with Jesus. Paul was not a radical individualist who thought exclusively in terms of individual salvation. This misunderstands Paul. Paul is an Ecclesia-theologian — a practitioner who starts up churches, revs them up, and then moves on for more of the same. But, always, Paul is concerned with missional communities and not just isolated worship centers.

Third, and my final comment on this series of Kingdom blogs, is that the gospel is designed to accomplish just this: the Kingdom of God, in the context of a community of faith (Ecclesia), for the good of others and the world. The gospel does its work through the death and resurrection of Jesus and the empowerment that comes from the Holy Spirit.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(3)
post a comment
Bob

posted July 28, 2005 at 12:08 pm


Doesn’t Paul echo Peters “exiles and aliens” theme in 2 Cor 5 when he speaks of the church as being ambassadors? Representatives in this world whose home is in another.



report abuse
 

Bob Robinson

posted July 28, 2005 at 8:39 pm


Thanks for the excellent series!Hits exactly the mark of what I’ve been studying lately!



report abuse
 

Steven Kippel

posted November 8, 2005 at 8:49 pm


This was a great series that has helped me. Lately I’ve been thinking over the Kingdom of God and what it means today. It seems as if the Church is full of Christians in exile. This is from the enternal perspective, of course – I’m not speaking about sociol exile, but exile from the Kingdom of God. This isn’t imposed on them by anyone but themselves (in the sovereign grace of God of course). As Jesus said, the Kingdom of God is here already, and it seems as if the Church is looking to not embrace the Kingdom now, but is holding off until the second coming of our Lord.
There has got to be an eternal perspective brought back to the Church. This perspective is pressed throughout the Bible, especially by Jesus, Peter and Paul.
We hold onto this world too tightly. Our possesions, titles, politics, even our bodies. This world is fleeting. Our governments will soon disappear, and all our vested interests in them. All this spent effort by so many political groups created by the church, no matter what the intention, will be all done in vain. Jesus said to not fear the one that takes our bodies, yet we hold so tightly to our “right” to self-defence, even at the expense of other nations. 1 Peter 1 stresses this importance to live in the Kingdom that’s not of this world. Our glory will wither away, but the Glory of God, which we are clothed in, is everlasting.
The Kingdom of God has no borders, and only one King. The subjects of the Kingdom are comissioned to the ministry of reconciliation.
We are to affect the world with justice, this is true. We’re still in this world, and we’ve been charged to bring justice to the poor, the widow and the orphan. We often ignore our part of justice towards the poor though in our assaults on the rich. Yes, it’s unjust for the rich to horde their wealth while the poor suffer, but this doesn’t mean we should ignore the weak just to point out the injustice. Matthew 24 shows that we’re judged by what we’ve done for the marginalized, not for how we spoke out against the rich.
I’m sort of being fragmented right now. I’m at work and don’t have the luxury of thinking everything through right now.
Basically, there needs to be a perspective that has an eternal Kingdom across all borders and nationalities. This Kingdom has a purpose. We’re missing out on the work of God when we’re not realizing the Kingdom.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More Blogs To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Jesus Creed. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Red Letters with Tom Davis Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!  

posted 11:15:58am Aug. 16, 2012 | read full post »

Our Common Prayerbook 30 - 3
Psalm 30 thanks God (vv. 1-3, 11-12) and exhorts others to thank God (vv. 4-5). Both emerge from the concrete reality of David's own experience. Here is what that experience looks like:Step one: David was set on high and was flourishing at the hand of God's bounty (v. 7a).Step two: David became too

posted 12:15:30pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Theology After Darwin 1 (RJS)
One of the more important and more difficult pieces of the puzzle as we feel our way forward at the interface of science and faith is the theological implications of discoveries in modern science. A comment on my post Evolution in the Key of D: Deity or Deism noted: ...this reminds me of why I get a

posted 6:01:52am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Almost Christian 4
Who does well when it comes to passing on the faith to the youth? Studies show two groups do really well: conservative Protestants and Mormons; two groups that don't do well are mainline Protestants and Roman Catholics. Kenda Dean's new book is called Almost Christian: What the Faith of Ou

posted 12:01:53am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Let's Get Neanderthal!
The Cave Man Diet, or Paleo Diet, is getting attention. (Nothing is said about Culver's at all.) The big omission, I have to admit, is that those folks were hunters -- using spears or smacking some rabbit upside the conk or grabbing a fish or two with their hands ... but that's what makes this diet

posted 2:05:48pm Aug. 30, 2010 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.