Jesus Creed

Jesus Creed


Kingdom of God 3

posted by xscot mcknight

Kingdom of God is the central vision of Jesus, and today we want to look at the Beatitudes in Luke 6:20-26. It is tempting to expand such a consideration, and look at all of the Sermon on the Mount/Plain. I’ll leave that to you.

In the Beatitudes of Luke (Matthew’s differ slightly, and we’ll avoid noting all those differences), Jesus says this:

“Blessed are you who are poor,
for yours is the kingdom of God.
21 “Blessed are you who are hungry now,
for you will be filled.
“Blessed are you who weep now,
for you will laugh.

22 “Blessed are you when people hate you, and when they exclude you, revile you, and defame you on account of the Son of Man. 23 Rejoice in that day and leap for joy, for surely your reward is great in heaven; for that is what their ancestors did to the prophets.

24 “But woe to you who are rich,
for you have received your consolation.
25 “Woe to you who are full now,
for you will be hungry.
“Woe to you who are laughing now,
for you will mourn and weep.
26 “Woe to you when all speak well of you, for that is what their ancestors did to the false prophets.

There is a clear contrast between the poor and the rich, the hungry and the full, the weeping and the laughing. Jesus blesses the former and utters woe to the latter.

It is a mistake to think this a list of virtues, as so many have done. The Beatitudes may indicate behavioral traits, but what the beatitudes do more specifically is “bless” specific groups to whom Jesus says God will show his final mercy as the Kingdom of God is established. Jesus is saying that in the Kingdom of God there will be the poor, the hungry, and those who weep — along with those who are persecuted because of their association with Jesus. This Kingdom will exclude those who live contrary to God’s will.

In other words, the goal isn’t to go out and be poor, or starve yourself so you’ll be hungry, or become sad so you can weep, or even go out and do something to get persecuted. No, what needs to be seen here is that Jesus sees the inauguration of the Kingdom underway, and he says this first set of people are the ones who will be in it, and the second group won’t.

The Matthean list, which is sometimes treated as nothing but a list of virtues, needs to be seen for what it is as well: it is a contrast with those who are not those things: the poor, the mourning, the meek, the righteous-seekers, the merciful, the pure in heart, the peacemakers, and the persecuted are in contrast to to the rich, the laughing, the haughty, the power-seekers, the unmerciful, the pure in externalities only, the warmongers, and those who are persecuting.

Put together, we have a seamless thread from Mary to the Beatitudes: the Kingdom of God is the society in which the will of God is done, and it is a society for anyone who will join up with Jesus and live as he teaches. This society, however, will surprise many for it will not be directed by the powerful, but populated by the pious poor and marginalized who simply do what Jesus calls them to do, who simply long for God’s will and God’s justice to be established so Israel can be the community God has called it to be.

When we see Kingdom, we need to think “society.” When the nation and then later the entire Roman empire didn’t respond, this little “society” became more accustomed to “church” instead of “Kingdom,” but “Kingdom” has always been the larger, more encompassing vision that Jesus has for us.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(4)
post a comment
Ted Gossard

posted July 25, 2005 at 11:50 pm


Scot, thanks so muuch for these posts on the kingdom. I appreciate you helping us focus on the exegetical basis for what the good news of the kingdom was that Jesus proclaimed. And for your thoughts as to the meaning of it.We may have heard or read this before but as you have laid it out and explained it, I think is most helpful and at least a good refresher for us.



report abuse
 

C. Baruch

posted July 26, 2005 at 5:18 am


I must admit that the beatitudes being about people’s situations rather than virtues is a new one for me. I can see how it works in Luke. In fact, it answers some questions. However, I still think that the Matthew version dwells more on the virtues. If one happens to be rich and never lacking in things to eat, and no tragic cercumstances ever happening etc, they could be at a loss according to Luke, but could still make the choice to adopt the virtues found in the Matthew account. It’s still not an easy choice, I believe, if we really understand them. I believe that the Matthew and Luke versions were given at different times in different contexts that called for a slightly different emphesis in each.



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted July 26, 2005 at 8:58 am


C. Baruch,The emphatic position, in Greek, of “yours” in “because theirs is the kingdom of heavens” indicates, so it seems to me, a group-think on the Matthean beatitudes. But, Mt’s listing is more ethically-focused than Lk’s.



report abuse
 

jpu

posted August 4, 2005 at 9:52 am


I just don’t konw Scot. these are such relative terms. Relative to the rest of the world, we Americans are in the “woe” category. Relative to my work community i may be blessed but to my inner city neighborhood i’m in the woes again. i think physical situations can lend themselves to different spiritual states, e.g. it is ahrd for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of heaven Mt. 19:23, but spirtual poverty and hunger and mourning are scattered across groups.God is goodjpu



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More Blogs To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Jesus Creed. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Red Letters with Tom Davis Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!  

posted 11:15:58am Aug. 16, 2012 | read full post »

Our Common Prayerbook 30 - 3
Psalm 30 thanks God (vv. 1-3, 11-12) and exhorts others to thank God (vv. 4-5). Both emerge from the concrete reality of David's own experience. Here is what that experience looks like:Step one: David was set on high and was flourishing at the hand of God's bounty (v. 7a).Step two: David became too

posted 12:15:30pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Theology After Darwin 1 (RJS)
One of the more important and more difficult pieces of the puzzle as we feel our way forward at the interface of science and faith is the theological implications of discoveries in modern science. A comment on my post Evolution in the Key of D: Deity or Deism noted: ...this reminds me of why I get a

posted 6:01:52am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Almost Christian 4
Who does well when it comes to passing on the faith to the youth? Studies show two groups do really well: conservative Protestants and Mormons; two groups that don't do well are mainline Protestants and Roman Catholics. Kenda Dean's new book is called Almost Christian: What the Faith of Ou

posted 12:01:53am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Let's Get Neanderthal!
The Cave Man Diet, or Paleo Diet, is getting attention. (Nothing is said about Culver's at all.) The big omission, I have to admit, is that those folks were hunters -- using spears or smacking some rabbit upside the conk or grabbing a fish or two with their hands ... but that's what makes this diet

posted 2:05:48pm Aug. 30, 2010 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.