Jesus Creed

Jesus Creed


Hermeneutics of Love

posted by xscot mcknight

Alan Jacobs, in his brilliantly written and wide-ranging book, A Theology of Reading, makes a simple point that has sent my mind reeling and my heart into confession and prayer. Here it is: genuine interpretation of another’s writing is an act of love or it is an act of abuse. Either we treat the author as a person who has given voice to his or her inner heart and that we can trust, listen to, and respond to. Or, we treat that person as a duplicitous voice that we can’t trust and that we can strip in order to use for our own power.

So, we either listen to the words of Jesus or to the words of a blogger (to use two extremes) and give them our trust and respond to them, or we make of the words of Jesus or a blogger what we’d like and the latter is a form of interpersonal abuse.

To love a person is to listen to them, and to let their voice speak. To listen to a person is to let that person’s world enter into our world. When the latter happens we choose either to enhance our own life with the other person or, as Cain did to Abel, we destroy that other person to make them what we want ourselves. To treat them with love and trust is to let them be the Eikons God made them to be; to refuse to trust them and love them is to make them a golden calf which we can hammer down into our own image.

We have no other real options.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(8)
post a comment
Bob Robinson

posted April 13, 2005 at 6:49 pm


This is very nice.I have been in dialogue with a very intelligent guy I”ve become friends with at Starbucks. He comments on my blog as “Lyricano.” One of the things that he does not buy is the way evangelicals interpret the Bible. He does not believe that we can ever arrive at the author’s orignal intention (or, probably more accurate to his thinking, we SHOULD NOT TRY to). He is more of the leaning that what’s more important is the reader’s interpretation (and, his knowing that I have postmodern philosphical leanings, he tries to get me to go along with this).Your post here on “love” as a motivator will take this dialogue to another level. Thanks.BTW, I have a question for you here.



report abuse
 

Rob M

posted April 14, 2005 at 8:17 am


I’ve been think more about this since your similar comment on my blog yesterday. I wonder if it is context related? For instance, part of the beauty of art, or of a good story, is the way it can be interpreted differently by different individuals according to what they bring to the table–er, the book, so to speak.But then, maybe that goes back to your point that this is how the author (or artist) intends for their voice to be heard… Hmmm…This reminds me a bit of John Sailhammer talking about how we approach what we are reading: is it a window, a frame, or a mirror?



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted April 14, 2005 at 1:54 pm


My blogsite wasn’t working until now, so excuse the delay Rob:You are right; some works of art are intentionally poly-semic or multivalent (however the experts say these things). And, to listen to that work of art aright is to let it be different things to different people.In general, however, texts have to be taken at their word with much less intentional ambiguity and therefore literally. So, when I say “he’s alive” I don’t get to say “for me” and maybe not for others, but that “he’s really alive.”



report abuse
 

Danny

posted April 14, 2005 at 7:34 pm


This is a very good point. Years ago when I was not so smart a man I was posting a lot a Cygnus-study (“Debunking the Bible”) trying to convert to entire world to Christianity. One of the girls on the board (a pseudo Buddhist-Agnostic) told me that I would never understand here because I wasn’t listening. It really struck me hard. It was only when I stopped trying to “invent” who I thought they were that I could have a real dialogue with these people.



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted April 15, 2005 at 4:48 am


What you’ve learned, and will continue to learn, I also am learning. Listening engages the whole person, and sometimes I’m reticent to give the whole person. Thanks for your reminder.



report abuse
 

Daniel

posted April 17, 2005 at 3:04 pm


Scot, recently I was reading Tom Schreiner’s “The Race Set Before Us.” Throughout he referred to your work on the warnings in Hebrews. I’m teaching through Hebrews for a high-school Sunday School class and I was wondering about where I could find your article.



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted April 18, 2005 at 9:06 pm


It is in Trinity Journal, way back when. If you e-mail me through my northpark.edu site, I’ll send you a copy but be sure to give me your address.



report abuse
 

Sean

posted March 16, 2010 at 10:07 pm


Fascinating comment Scot. I was wondering if it was a direct quote or your summary? I’ve read this book, and for the life of me can’t find the quote. Which either suggests I wasn’t paying attention, or this is your summary of his position? Do you have a page reference? Sorry to bother…
thanks



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More Blogs To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Jesus Creed. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Red Letters with Tom Davis Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!  

posted 11:15:58am Aug. 16, 2012 | read full post »

Our Common Prayerbook 30 - 3
Psalm 30 thanks God (vv. 1-3, 11-12) and exhorts others to thank God (vv. 4-5). Both emerge from the concrete reality of David's own experience. Here is what that experience looks like:Step one: David was set on high and was flourishing at the hand of God's bounty (v. 7a).Step two: David became too

posted 12:15:30pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Theology After Darwin 1 (RJS)
One of the more important and more difficult pieces of the puzzle as we feel our way forward at the interface of science and faith is the theological implications of discoveries in modern science. A comment on my post Evolution in the Key of D: Deity or Deism noted: ...this reminds me of why I get a

posted 6:01:52am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Almost Christian 4
Who does well when it comes to passing on the faith to the youth? Studies show two groups do really well: conservative Protestants and Mormons; two groups that don't do well are mainline Protestants and Roman Catholics. Kenda Dean's new book is called Almost Christian: What the Faith of Ou

posted 12:01:53am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Let's Get Neanderthal!
The Cave Man Diet, or Paleo Diet, is getting attention. (Nothing is said about Culver's at all.) The big omission, I have to admit, is that those folks were hunters -- using spears or smacking some rabbit upside the conk or grabbing a fish or two with their hands ... but that's what makes this diet

posted 2:05:48pm Aug. 30, 2010 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.