Advertisement

Islam In America

Islam In America

Exploiting the Prophet

posted by Suzy Shuraym

In The New York Times on 22 September, Nicholas D. Kristof asks, “why do parts of the Islamic world erupt in violence over insults to the Prophet Muhammad?”

Read his conclusions here.

Advertisement

A 21st-Century Islam

posted by Suzy Shuraym

“The Muslim world cannot have it both ways. It cannot place Islam at the center of political life — and in extreme cases political violence — while at the same time declaring that the religion is off-limits to contestation and ridicule,” writes Roger Cohen in The New York Times.

“Politics is a rough-and-tumble game.”

Read it all here: “A 21st-Century Islam”.

Advertisement

A Ransacked Book Market

posted by Suzy Shuraym

Does anyone wonder why Islam is considered a repressive, positively medieval religion?

Actions such as this:

“Historic Baghdad Book Market Bulldozed”.

Advertisement

What’s Happening in Muslim Majority Countries?

posted by Suzy Shuraym

From a Western perspective, the violent rioting over something as innocuous as a poorly-dubbed, badly-acted, low-budget film (or, rather, just the YouTube posting of a trailer purporting to preview the film) is baffling.

As the story has developed over the past week or so, it emerges that this film (“The Innocence of Islam”) was made specifically to inspire such rioting overseas.

The question for Americans is: Why have crowds taken the bait? Don’t they know they’ve been conned by charlatans? Don’t they know they’ve been manipulated into feeding a negative stereotype?

Surely neither Islam nor the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is harmed by these idiots, and it’s hard to imagine any Muslim loosing his or her faith by watching such a film or, in this case, just knowing that it exists.

Advertisement

As William Saletan wrote in Slate, “Internet videos will insult your religion. Ignore them.”

Both religion and freedom of speech became enshrined in the founding documents of the United States of America. The Bill of Rights, the collection of the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution, starts off with this, the first one:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That America should not establish a religion for its citizens implicitly recognized that in the pre-Revolutionary period a diversity of belief (or no belief at all) prevailed in the Colonies. In contrast to England (where the Anglican denomination was the established church), the new country would have no state religion. Government and faith would be separate spheres.

Advertisement

Freedom of speech, a concept developed during the European Enlightenment, took on added significance following a revolution by colonies against their home country.

Key to the development of the Bill of Rights were the writings of John Locke (1632-1704), an English philosopher and physician widely regarded as one of the most influential of Enlightenment thinkers. He argued that each individual is free and equal in the state of nature. Therefore, each individual could (and should) be free to say what he or she thinks and believe what he or she believes.

No government could prevent one from speaking out (on virtually any topic barring treason), and no government could decide what religion all its citizens should follow.

Voltaire (1694-1778), a French Enlightenment writer, historian and philosopher known not only for his wit but for his passionate advocacy of civil liberties, is quoted as saying, “Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so too”.

Advertisement

Thus, riots protesting exercise of these rights confuse Americans – and not only because few (if any) of the rioters could have seen the film or even the 14-minute trailer.

The average American wonders: How can it be possible that people in 2012 still believe that thought can or should be regulated? Why target nonconforming people with blasphemy laws? Why riot when foreigners post a video? Why act as though the behavior of others will shake your faith?

It’s often said that the Islamic world is mired in the medieval past. That “top down” dictates of religion and speech are still expected and acceptable because Muslims outside the West have not experienced an equivalent to the European Enlightenment.

Perhaps it is up to Muslims in America to tackle the hard work of bringing a faith forged some 1400 years ago in the sands of the Arabian Peninsula to the globalized 21st Century.

Previous Posts

ISIS and "The West"
"Much of the imagery of Western Orientalism of the past two centuries has a similar message, highlighting a binary difference between 'us' and 'them',” writes Frederick Bohrer in The Los Angeles Review of Books. "Would the ISIS videos even ...

posted 12:15:30am May. 25, 2015 | read full post »

Black. Gay. Imam.
"Think you have challenges in your life? What do you think the challenges are for a gay, black, Muslim who is the United States’ first openly gay Imam?" Read more about Daayiee Abdullah, who lives and works in Washington, D.C.: Meet ...

posted 1:34:31pm May. 23, 2015 | read full post »

Do Muslim Babies Always Grow Up to Be Muslim Adults?
Here's a provocative assertion: "The recent Pew survey shows that Islam is the fastest growing religion, not because people are converting to Islam, but because they’re having more babies. The fertility rate is much higher than that of any ...

posted 12:01:15am May. 17, 2015 | read full post »

ISIS is at it again: Palmyra in its sites
The jury of public opinion is still out about whether ISIS had anything to do with the shootings in Garland, Texas, but there's no doubt they're still causing havoc in the Middle East. This week's target? The ancient city of Palmyra. (One ...

posted 12:38:56am May. 16, 2015 | read full post »

Did ISIS Really Do It?
ISIS has claimed "responsibility" for the two gunmen shot down in Garland, Texas, on Sunday. One wonders why, since the pair failed miserably in their attempt to kill some of the crowd at the event. Why crow about abject failure? As many ...

posted 1:02:55pm May. 06, 2015 | read full post »

Advertisement


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.