The next cover of Charlie Hebdo features Muhammad holding a sign reading, “Je suis Charlie.” The tagline: “All is forgiven.” The magazine plans to print 3 million issues just one week after its editorial staff was gunned down by terrorists.
“What can Muslims do to reclaim their ‘Beautiful Religion’?” asks the headline for a full-page advertisement in yesterday’s (11 January 2015) New York Times.
The ad, from the Gatestone Institute, points to “behadings and savagery by ISIS, female genital mutilations and honor killings, the abduction of girls by Boko Haram, the execution of innocents in Iran, the slaughtering and enslaving of Christians in Egypt and Africa and Yazidis and Kurds in Iraq and Syria, rampant anti-Semitism and other crimes against humanity committed by those who claim to represent Islam”.
It is an eloquent plea for denial and “relative silence” among Western Muslims to stop.
But this observer wonders about the source. A check of the website for the Gatestone Institute turns up no copy of the declaration published in the ad (although the ad itself says it can be found there) and does not mention the list of signers (from across the United States and Canada plus the United Kingdom). You can see it on Tarek Fatah’s website.
Gatestone bills itself as “a non-partisan, not-for-profit international policy council and think tank”, but it’s chaired by John R. Bolton, former United States Permanent Representative to the United Nations who’s also a Fox News contributor. Gatestone itself was founded in 2011 by Nina Rosenwald (an heiress of Sears Roebuck), who has been a key philanthropic backer of anti-Muslim groups and individuals in the U.S. Bolton is often described as a neo-conservative.
What’s your take on what’s bound to be a controversial full-page statement?
According to Wikipedia, the term “whack-a-mole” is used colloquially to denote a repetitious and futile task: each time an adversary is “whacked”, it only pops up again somewhere else.
Not politically correct, I know: but it popped into my mind as I was reading about the horrific slaughter in Paris, France, today (7 January 2015).
The Muslims of ISIS are so afraid of dissident ideas that they kill those who espouse them. Only to have yet another dissident idea pop up somewhere else.
To use yet another colloquialism: it’s a mug’s game.
It’s also an ineffective way to win converts to Islam in the 21st century.
Saudi Arabia is the only country on Earth where women are prohibited from driving.
How in the world do we let a petroleum producing country get away with that?
Why aren’t American Muslim women ridiculing the aging Saudi princes for their nonsensical behavior? For that matter, why aren’t American Muslim men deriding this hidebound ruling elite?