The American Church, specifically Evangelicalism, is now in a place no one could have imagined in days gone by. For the longest, biblical teaching was at least available in plenty of venues. Where Bible prophecy teachers once taught that a “one-world religion” would be ushered-in, they assumed it would be a coalition of the Catholic Church and the New Age.
No one expected such an entity to include American evangelicals.
The Bible’s book of Jude speaks of this. This short letter was a warning from its author to the Church of the last days. Jude was telling people that certain men would infiltrate the Church and teach falsehoods.
That day has arrived in the West.
Celebrity pastor Andy Stanley for some time has been sounding-off about his views of the Church’s need for new pr; he wishes to see it marketed in a way that will attract unbelievers. This very premise, this model for “doing church,” is flawed and unworkable. The Bible doesn’t teach that unbelievers will be attracted to gatherings of believers. In fact, the Bible teaches that the Gospel itself is hateful to the world.
But Andy Stanley has taken pragmatism to new heights. From his admission that he jettisoned belief in the creation accounts in college, to his latest declarations that we must avoid encouraging people to believe the Bible as it’s written, Stanley had departed from biblical Christianity. Instead, he wishes to fashion a new spirituality.
To say such a thing in public is even now not popular. So far as I know, only Albert Mohler has had the courage to challenge Stanley publicly. Most celebrity pastors and ministries stand silent, staring at the floor.
Let me be clear: it is outrageous for a modern pastor to denigrate Scripture. Yet that is precisely what Stanley is doing. He has his defenders, naturally. There are pensions, and salaries, and perks at stake, and many modern ministry leaders circle the wagons—even when heresy and apostasy abound.
Stanley claims to want to make “the faith” acceptable for unbelievers. In fact, if this is true, he is still creating conditions for wholesale unbelief in the Bible. Remember Jesus’ words in Luke 18:7-8—
And shall not God avenge his own elect, which cry day and night unto him, though he bear long with them?
I tell you that he will avenge them speedily. Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth?
Stanley’s pragmatic approach sounds so good, even to legions of modern evangelicals, many of whom flock to seeker-sensitive churches. Yet the Bible does not point to a future Church that is great in number. It does point to Apostasy.
That is a Church pastors like Andy Stanley are building brick-by-brick.
With the passing of Israel’s legendary Shimon Peres, an unusually high number of accolades is streaming into the Jewish state. Even President Obama ordered flags lowered to half-mast at federal buildings in the U.S. Montages of Peres meeting world leaders play on social media.
Peres, 93, served Israel in a variety of capacities, and his spearheading of the Olso Accords has invited both criticisms and bouquets. Once known more as a hawk (Peres was defense minister at the time of the Entebbe rescue), the urbane politician had moved to the left in the previous decades, being part of both the Labor and Kadima parties.
Even his critics are largely silent for a few days, out of respect.
Not so the Palestinians. Hamas has called for a “Day of Rage” during Peres’ funeral. Meanwhile, the rival to Hamas, the Palestinian Authority, is silent.
An honest person will admit that the Palestinians, for a quarter-century, have squandered opportunities by the bushel-full. The leadership owes its wealth to the Peres Crowd, which worked tirelessly to prop-up a failing PLO and Yasser Arafat in 1990.
The Palestinian snub of Shimon Peres is one more reminder that the Palestinians are nowhere near ready for a state. The PLO/PA is a primitive, crude entity mired in seventh-century dogma.
It will be a cold day in Gaza before they’re ready for Palestine.
Tim LaHaye, the popular Christian author and speaker, died last month at age 90. To the end, he was vital and very engaged in one of his main passions: teaching Bible prophecy.
I met him 20 years ago and he was always the same. A very approachable, kind man. When his improbable success with the Left Behind book series began in the mid-90’s, millions became aware of the particular brand of prophecy LaHaye espoused, namely, the Pre-Tribulation Rapture. In short, this view claims that Jesus Christ will rapture, or “capture away from Earth” a remnant of believers before a time of great trouble falls over the globe.
In recent years, I’ve been intrigued to see the attacks on this view, from within the American Church. Specifically, from within evangelicalism, where LaHaye dominated for decades.
Times have changed.
I find that men like LaHaye and his colleague, Thomas Ice, are reasonable researchers and more than that, good men. Their detractors come close to something like loathing when discussing the prophecy guys.
But I would encourage you to check out the website for the Pre-Trib Research Center, in particular the articles, and see for yourself.
Another legacy of LaHaye’s, lesser known, is his work with creationists. When Henry Morris started the Institute for Creation Research in 1970, his friend LaHaye was there in support. Eventually, they, along with George Hillestad, founded Master Books, which is still the world’s most preeminent publisher of creationist books. LaHaye remained close with Master Books’ publisher, Tim Dudley, and was always interested in the latest offerings from the company.
I have always been interested in the fact that when one believes the creation accounts in Genesis, the person also tends to support prophecy teaching and the historic claims of Israel. Conversely, those who adhere to an “old earth” or theistic evolution stance tend to downplay prophecy and Israel.
Tim LaHaye was in the thick of those wars for 50 years.
Goodbye, sir. Many of us expect to see you again soon.
The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution is under fire, so to speak.
Everyone agrees violence is roaming across the country: police are under assault, targeted for assassination by “activists” who have more in common with anarchists and Marxists than they do anyone else.
Added to this is the threat of terrorism rooted in Islam (few want to say that, couching it in terms of radical Islamist terrorism), and citizens of the U.S. feel threatened and unsafe.
In many ways we are facing unprecedented challenges. The Trojan Horse of jihadists will get worse if Donald Trump isn’t elected president. Hillary Clinton wants to follow the lead of Angela Merkel and allow millions of Middle Eastern refugees into the country, without vetting them.
This is a staggering display of insanity.
And that’s the point, I think. It’s actually pointless to argue.
So long as we live in a flawed world, evil people will threaten peace-loving people, who are in the majority.
Liberals and leftists often decry the presence of guns in our world. Leftist Shane Claiborne, among other things, is involved in efforts to break down firearms and make them into plows, etc.
He’s able to do that from the relative safety of the United States. Yet his extreme naiveté ultimately endangers him, his family, and his followers.
The fact is, bad men like ISIS murder defenseless men, women, and children. We don’t live in an idealized world; we live in a world threatened by evil people.
Arguments over gun control won’t fade away. Happily for all of us, we can decide to follow our consciences.
As for me, I have some of the 300+ million guns in this country and I know how to use them. If it comes down to it, I’ll protect myself, and my family.
If Shane Claiborne wants to make dinnerware out of a revolver, let him.
You won’t get an argument from me.