Deepak Chopra and Intent

Deepak Chopra and Intent

Back to School Tears (by Mallika Chopra)

posted by Mallika Chopra

Back to school this year resulted in tears – mommy tears.
For me, it began with the closet cleaning to get rid of old clothes and stock up on new ones. Each outfit we packed up brought so many memories – remember when we chose this outfit; oh, her grandmother was so happy when she gave this to her; this is what she wore on her birthday; I can’t believe she has outgrown this!
Then, there was the back to school shopping, and realizing that my younger is outgrowing her princess phase. I never thought I would miss those princesses!! And, my elder was focused on getting a backpack that could hold her books – books she is reading!
I was honestly surprised at myself – after all, my girls – 6.5 and 4 – are not even making major transitions. Same schools, same kids, just new teachers. But, this year, I really felt that they are growing up — growing up way too fast.
And, then, today – first day of school. First grade! Excitement mixed with nervousness. I watched my daughter enter school – looking at the new kindergartners feeling older, proud that she had been there, done that. But, she couldn’t hide her apprehension about going to her new class. Unsure which friends to coalesce with – just wanting, really, to hang out with mommy. Oh my little baby – I did not want to leave her!
First friend I ran into looked at me and said, “Don’t say a word.” She had dropped her eldest daughter to college last weekend. Had just broken down in the local coffee shop.
Second mom’s lip quivered when I asked how first day of preschool went. Not great – he clung to her when she left. She peaked in through the windows. Held it together, but my question made her finally break down.
Alas, mommy tears.
– Mallika Chopra, http://intent.com
Visit http://intent.com to share your stories and intents around this time of endings and new beginnings.

Is Palin Supposed to Attract the Women Vote? (by Mallika Chopra)

posted by Mallika Chopra

In choosing 1st term Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin as his VP pick, McCain and his advisors have demonstrated how thick headed they are when it comes to women. Do they honestly believe women are so stupid to vote purely for a woman? I supported Hillary because she was a smart, experienced woman who supported and has spent her life fighting for the issues I believe in, and I felt confident she would be a great American President.
Apparently, Republicans were desperate to choose a woman, not actually caring about experience or judgment, but solely focused on changing the dialogue and showing how bold they can be. Also, she is staunchly pro-life – an effort to attract the Republican conservative base. Is that going to attract the women voters who believe in their own right to choose?
The Obama/Biden ticket represents change, but also wise judgment, experience, hope and a new direction at its core. It is a choice that is the right one for America, not made just for a news headline.
Get a sneak peak of our new venture at http://intent.com

Obama and the Tragedy of Apathy

posted by dchopra

Listening to Barack Obama’s acceptance speech, I got two messages. The first was tactical. Like a general mapping out a battle strategy, Obama has listened carefully to his critics, and in the speech he rolled out rebuttals, one by one, to the charge that he must announce plans and solutions to the country’s nagging problems. His trademark eloquence mostly had to wait until the last few moments, but when it came, the giant stadium audience was moved. Yet for all its effectiveness in terms of tactics, the speech didn’t dispel the specter that hung over it, and over the Obama campaign as a whole. The second message I heard was one of doubt and bewilderment. Can it really be true that a vast swath of the electorate thinks that Obama isn’t an American or Christian, that he’s a Muslim who wants to raise their taxes? A wiffle ball celebrity who has no real ideas?
At the root of this specter is apathy and indifference. By now, the country should know who Obama is and what he stands for. Most people do, in fact, and they have picked sides. They probably picked sides months ago, since the better informed a voter is, the more likely they are to make their decisions in the opening months of an election. The least informed and most apathetic voters make up their minds late, and it’s these whom Obama must persuade. Can he?
For the past eight years the Republican machine has counted on the power of apathy to win elections. The effect works on several fronts:
–Appeal to bias and prejudice: Tell the voter that he’s right to distrust Obama and all black men in general. If you’re lucky, no new thinking or attitudes will pierce the shield of fixed opinions.
–Paint easy stereotypes: In Obama’s case, the stereotype is of the snob and outsider, the elitist who isn’t like you and me.
–Appeal to patriotism: Imply that Obama doesn’t love the flag and therefore is inclined to cut and run, give in to foreign enemies, and neglect security.
–Fabricate falsehoods and never back down from your lies: Swift boating is the classic example, but calling Obama a Muslim competes on the same level of sleaze and dishonesty.
–Doubt your opponent’s masculinity: This goes along with branding Obama a snob and an elitist but takes a subtle turn with the suggestion that he isn’t experienced enough to run a war: he’s a green youth sent to do a soldier’s job.
–Fan the flames of fear: A tactic that won over the security moms for Bush in 2004 but has since weakened its punch. Fear could easily rise again if there is a major security threat between now and the election.
–Tell the public that everything is fine and not to worry. This is the opposite of the last point, but a certain segment of the population isn’t bothered by contradictions. If Obama can be a Muslim and have a crazy Christian preacher at the same time, people might buy that the economy is tanking but there’s no need to rock the boat.
It’s tragic that these simple, low tactics have been so thoroughly effective since Reagan’s rise in 1980, became perfected when the first George Bush slimed Michael Dukakis, and reached an apogee under Karl Rove. It’s not an absolute truth that appealing to the most indifferent and least informed voters wins elections. But in an environment where two or three percentage points can shift the Presidency, playing the apathy card seems to work. What Obama has on his side is powerful: higher registration among Democrats, a surge of charisma and optimism, intelligence, a widespread sense that the Bush administration has been a massive failure, all the blunders in Iraq, a sagging economy, soaring gas pries, a mass perception that the country is headed in the wrong direction, and a workable vision for getting America back on track. In ordinary times, these advantages would overwhelm the Republicans and their none-too-strong candidate. Then you look at the polls and ask yourself, If Obama is so obviously superior by almost any measure, why isn’t he ahead already?
I don’t think anyone knows. We can speak of hidden racism and a need, as yet unfilled, for the average person to find out more about Obama, who remains, oddly, an enigma to many on Main Street. But the larger truth is that we have lived in the post-Watergate era with apathy and cynicism as the common denominator of politics. It would be a greater tragedy if this sad tradition continues, yet it will take nothing less than a sea change to end it.
Get a sneak peak of our new venture at http://intent.com
www.intentblog.com
www.deepakchopra.com

Deepak Chopra: We Are One Being

posted by akornfeld

Is your neighbor yourself? Sitting in the airport I had a moment of recognition that because we share molecules, we are part of one consciousness. Everyone here is recycling their thoughts, emotions, and molecules with me.

Previous Posts

God Is the New Physics
When spirituality and physics started to be linked, many scientists called it the use of metaphor. It couldn't literally be true that there was a Tao of Physics that linked quantum mechanics to ancient Chinese philosophy. At best there might be a weak link--God and the new physics--the way one might

posted 10:54:59am Dec. 15, 2014 | read full post »

Will God 2.0 Be Indispensable in Ten Years?
The primary difficult with God isn't belief--more than 80% of US responders tell pollsters that they believe God exists. The problem is that God is irrelevant, providing few if any practical benefits in daily life. In an age of faith the circumstances were in God's favor. When people got sick or die

posted 1:58:33pm Dec. 08, 2014 | read full post »

Why Physics Needs God But God Doesn't Need Physics
Recently I created a brief storm on Twitter by throwing out questions that physicists can't answer. Twitter allows you to contact famous physicists directly, and it's predictable that a handful will become irritated and even riled up if you dare to challenge them. "What happens in physics stays in p

posted 10:19:20am Dec. 01, 2014 | read full post »

Why God Makes More Sense than Atheism
After two centuries of the tug-of-war between science and religion, it's clear science occupies the dominant position. It has passed the "So what?" test, meaning that science as applied to practical daily life has been immensely more important to modern people than God. This has given atheism, both

posted 10:39:29am Nov. 24, 2014 | read full post »

How Richard Dawkins Lost His Battle with God
When he wrote his 2006 best-seller, The God Delusion, Richard Dawkins expected to accomplish two aims that have proved to be remarkable failures. The first aim was social. He wanted to attract a horde of doubters, fence-sitters, and agnostics to gather their courage and join the atheist ranks. This

posted 11:50:49am Nov. 17, 2014 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.